PHMSA Gas Integrity Management
Time: 11/08/2008 05:14 PM

Frequently-Asked Question FAQ #149

FAQ-149: Class 3 and 4 Areas as per se HCAs

Go To FAQ#:

Question: Must an operator treat all of its class 3 and 4 areas as high consequence areas?

Answer: No. Section 192.905 requires that an operator use either method (1) or method (2) from the definition in 192.903, not both. If an operator elects to use method (1) on a pipeline segment, then all of the class 3 and 4 areas associated with that segment will be considered HCAs. If, on the other hand, an operator chooses to use method (2) on a pipeline segment, then potential impact circles would be drawn and some areas that are class 3 might not be determined to be HCAs. An operator can select one method to use for its entire pipeline or can apply either method to individual segments of its pipeline.

Operators of pipelines operating below 30% SMYS who use method (2) should recognize that there are some requirements in section 192.935(d) that apply to class 3 and 4 pipelines that are not in HCAs.

These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are intended to clarify, explain, and promote better understanding of the pipeline integrity management rules. These FAQs are not substantive rules and do not create rights, assign duties, or impose new obligations not outlined in the existing integrity management regulations and standards. Requests for informal interpretations regarding the applicability of one or more of the pipeline integrity management rules to a specific situation may be submitted to PHMSA in accordance with 49 C.F.R. ยง 190.11.
DOT Website | PHMSA Website | Pipeline Safety Website | Feedback | Privacy Policy | FOIA