PHMSA Gas Integrity Management
Time: 11/08/2008 05:31 PM

Frequently-Asked Question FAQ #125

FAQ-125: Risk Ranking of Piggable Sections

Go To FAQ#:

Question: Can risk ranking be done by piggable sections, since that is the way my assessments will be conducted?

Answer: The rule requires that an operator must use risk assessment to prioritize covered segments for baseline assessments and reassessments (192.917(c)). OPS expects to see a ranking by covered segment.

Operators will need to manage their assessments, and some aggregate indication of risk, by piggable section, could be useful in that regard. Such aggregation can mask important information, however. For example, a number of low-risk covered segments in a piggable section could result in that section being determined to be of moderate risk even though it contains the highest risk covered segment in an operator's program. Operators need to know the relative risk of individual covered segments so that they can appropriately plan their assessment activities.

These Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) are intended to clarify, explain, and promote better understanding of the pipeline integrity management rules. These FAQs are not substantive rules and do not create rights, assign duties, or impose new obligations not outlined in the existing integrity management regulations and standards. Requests for informal interpretations regarding the applicability of one or more of the pipeline integrity management rules to a specific situation may be submitted to PHMSA in accordance with 49 C.F.R. ยง 190.11.
DOT Website | PHMSA Website | Pipeline Safety Website | Feedback | Privacy Policy | FOIA