BJS home page
Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2004 - Statistical Tables
Previous
Next
Related pages:
Courts and sentencing --
· Pretrial release & detention
· Criminal case processing
· Criminal sentencing
|
Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2004 - Statistical Tables
Download
spreadsheet version (.csv file)
Appendix table F. Failure-to-appear and rearrest rates of defendants released prior to case disposition, by SCPS jurisdiction, 2004
| County (State) |
Percent of released felony defendants who |
| |
| Failed to appear in court |
|
Were rearrested |
| |
|
| Total |
Returned
to court |
Remained
a fugitive |
Total |
Felony |
Misdemeanor |
| |
| Total |
21 |
% |
16 |
% |
5 |
% |
|
21 |
% |
13 |
% |
7 |
% |
| Jefferson (AL) |
29 |
% |
18 |
% |
10 |
% |
|
30 |
% |
20 |
% |
10 |
% |
| Maricopa (AZ) |
21 |
|
14 |
|
7 |
|
|
40 |
|
35 |
|
6 |
|
| Pima (AZ) |
14 |
|
11 |
|
3 |
|
|
26 |
|
16 |
|
11 |
|
| Alameda (CA) |
19 |
|
15 |
|
4 |
|
|
18 |
|
9 |
|
9 |
|
| Contra Costa (CA) |
27 |
|
25 |
|
2 |
|
|
33 |
|
26 |
|
8 |
|
| Los Angeles (CA) |
23 |
|
20 |
|
3 |
|
|
10 |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
| Orange (CA) |
17 |
|
13 |
|
4 |
|
|
27 |
|
18 |
|
8 |
|
| Riverside (CA) |
31 |
|
29 |
|
1 |
|
|
20 |
|
15 |
|
5 |
|
| San Bernardino (CA) |
36 |
% |
28 |
% |
8 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
12 |
% |
6 |
% |
| San Diego (CA) |
20 |
|
18 |
|
1 |
|
|
13 |
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
| San Mateo (CA) |
22 |
|
19 |
|
3 |
|
|
15 |
|
13 |
|
2 |
|
| Santa Clara (CA) |
31 |
|
25 |
|
6 |
|
|
22 |
|
12 |
|
10 |
|
| Broward (FL) |
17 |
|
13 |
|
4 |
|
|
30 |
|
24 |
|
6 |
|
| Miami-Dade (FL) |
17 |
|
15 |
|
2 |
|
|
39 |
|
31 |
|
8 |
|
| Palm Beach (FL) |
20 |
|
15 |
|
5 |
|
|
37 |
|
28 |
|
8 |
|
| Pinellas (FL) |
17 |
|
16 |
|
1 |
|
|
56 |
|
42 |
|
14 |
|
| Fulton (GA) |
25 |
% |
15 |
% |
10 |
% |
|
31 |
% |
18 |
% |
13 |
% |
| Honolulu (HI) |
14 |
|
14 |
|
0 |
|
|
21 |
|
16 |
|
5 |
|
| Cook (IL) |
19 |
|
14 |
|
4 |
|
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
-- |
|
| Marion (IN) |
33 |
|
26 |
|
6 |
|
|
30 |
|
15 |
|
14 |
|
| Baltimore (MD) |
15 |
|
11 |
|
5 |
|
|
19 |
|
8 |
|
11 |
|
| Montgomery (MD) |
16 |
|
12 |
|
4 |
|
|
11 |
|
3 |
|
9 |
|
| Wayne (MI) |
21 |
|
16 |
|
5 |
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
| Essex (NJ) |
21 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
|
20 |
|
17 |
|
2 |
|
| Bronx (NY) |
19 |
% |
15 |
% |
5 |
% |
|
22 |
% |
9 |
% |
13 |
% |
| Kings (NY) |
19 |
|
14 |
|
5 |
|
|
20 |
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
| Nassau (NY) |
13 |
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
|
17 |
|
3 |
|
14 |
|
| Queens (NY) |
10 |
|
7 |
|
3 |
|
|
11 |
|
7 |
|
4 |
|
| Westchester (NY) |
... |
|
... |
|
... |
|
|
... |
|
... |
|
... |
|
| Franklin (OH) |
11 |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
|
27 |
|
12 |
|
15 |
|
| Montgomery (PA) |
30 |
|
21 |
|
9 |
|
|
18 |
|
8 |
|
10 |
|
| Philadelphia (PA) |
34 |
|
23 |
|
11 |
|
|
12 |
|
9 |
|
4 |
|
| Shelby (TN) |
14 |
% |
12 |
% |
2 |
% |
|
20 |
% |
6 |
% |
14 |
% |
| Dallas (TX) |
10 |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
| El Paso (TX) |
8 |
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
|
14 |
|
5 |
|
9 |
|
| Harris (TX) |
10 |
|
8 |
|
2 |
|
|
7 |
|
2 |
|
4 |
|
| Tarrant (TX) |
12 |
|
9 |
|
2 |
|
|
5 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
| Travis (TX) |
16 |
|
9 |
|
7 |
|
|
17 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
| Salt Lake (UT) |
43 |
|
39 |
|
4 |
|
|
22 |
|
14 |
|
8 |
|
| Fairfax (VA) |
12 |
|
7 |
|
5 |
|
|
23 |
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
| |
Note: All defendants who failed to appear in court and were
not returned to the court during the 1-year study period are
counted as fugitives. Some of these defendants may have
been returned to the court at a later date. Rearrest data were
collected for 1 year. Rearrests occurring after the end of this
1-year study period are not included in the table. Information
on rearrests occurring in jurisdictions other than the one granting
the pretrial release was not always available. Detail may not add
to total because of rounding.
-- Less than 0.5%.
...Data were not available for this jurisdiction.
|
| |
Source: State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS)
See also Methodology. |
