American
Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 2003. R&D
earmarks total $1.4 billion in final FY 2003 budget. AAAS R&D
funding update March 3, 2003. http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/earm03f.pdf.
Accessed March 2003.
Arunachalam, S. 2002. "Is science
in India on the decline?" Current Science 83 (July 25): 108109.
Brainard, J. 2002. Another record
year for academic pork. The Chronicle of Higher Education 49
(September 27).
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1994. A
Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Princeton,
NJ.
De Solla Price, D. 1986. Little Science, Big Science and Beyond.
New York: Columbia University Press.
European Commission. 2001. A New Framework Programme for
European ResearchTowards a European Research Area. Brussels,
Belgium: European Union.
Geisler, E. 2001. The mires of
research evaluation. The Scientist 15(10):39. Available at
http://www.thescientist.com/yr2001/may/opin_010514.html.
Accessed July 2003.
Huttner, S. 1999. Knowledge and the biotech economy: A case of
mistaken identity. Paper presented at the High-Level CERI/OECD/NSF
Forum on Measuring Knowledge in Learning Economies and Societies,
May, Arlington, VA.
Mowery, D. C., and B. N. Sampat. 2002. International emulation
of Bayh-Dole: Rash or rational? Paper presented at AAAS Symposium
on International Trends in the Transfer of Academic Research, February,
Boston.
National Research Council (NRC). 1991. Ending Mandatory Retirement
for Tenured Faculty. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science
Board (NSB). 1996. Science and Engineering Indicators
1996. NSB-96-21. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science
Board (NSB). 2002. Science and Engineering Indicators
2002. NSB-02-1. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation (NSF). 2003. Revolutionizing Science
and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure.
Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 1995a. Guide to NSF Science/Engineering Resources
Data. NSF 95318. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
(NSF/SRS). 1995b. NSF Survey Instruments Used in Collecting
Science and Engineering Resources Data. NSF 95317. Arlington,
VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
(NSF/SRS). 2000. Latin America: R&D Spending
Jumps in Brazil, Mexico, and Costa Rica. NSF 00316. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
(NSF/SRS). 2001. Scientific and Engineering Research Facilities:
1999. NSF 01330. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
(NSF/SRS). 2003. Academic Research and Development Expenditures:
Fiscal Year 2001. NSF 03316. Arlington, VA.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
(NSF/SRS). Forthcoming. Gender Differences in the Careers
of Academic Scientists and Engineers. Arlington, VA.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development (OECD). 2002. OECD Questionnaire on the Patenting
and Licensing Activities of PRO's. Paris.
Sampat, B 2002. Private parts:
Patents and academic research in the twentieth century. Paper prepared
for Research Symposium of the Next Generation of Leaders in Science
and Technology Policy, 2223 November, Washington, DC.
Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur's Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological
Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Thursby, J., R. Jensen, and M. Thursby. 2001. Objectives, characteristics
and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities.
Journal of Technology Transfer 26: 5972.
Trune, D., and L. Goslin. 2000. Assessment of technology transfer
profitability within US universities. European Biopharmaceutical
Review (September): 5662.
U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Science, Space, and
Technology. 1993. Academic Earmarks: An Interim Report by the Chairman of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Washington, DC.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2002. Analytical perspectives.
Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2003. Washington, DC.
|