American Association for the Advancement
of Science and Centre for Science Research and Statistics (AAAS/CSRS).
2001. Comparative study of national R&D policy and R&D data
systems in the United States and Russia (draft). Washington, DC.
Arrow, K. J. 1962. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources
for invention. In R. Nelson, ed., The Rate and Direction of Inventive
Activity, pp. 60925. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bas, C. L., and C. Sierra. 2002. Location versus home country advantages
in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals' location
strategies. Research Policy 31:589609.
Bloom, N., R. Griffith, and J. Van Reenen. 2002. Do R&D tax
credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 19791997. Journal
of Public Economics 85:131.
Bozeman, B. 2000. Technology transfer and public policy: A review
of research and theory. Research Policy 29:62755.
Branscomb, L. M., and R. Florida. 1998. Challenges to technology
policy in a changing world economy. In L. M. Branscomb and J. H.
Keller, Investing in Innovation- Creating a Research and Innovation
Policy That Works, pp. 339. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Brealey, R., and S. Myers. 1996. Principles of Corporate Finance.
New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brod, A., and A. N. Link. 2001. Trends in cooperative research
activity. In M. P. Feldman and A. Link, eds., Technology Policy
for the Knowledge-Based Economy. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Colwell, R. 2001. Director's forum lecture. Speech presented to
the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 7 November,
Washington, DC.
Coombs, R., and L. Georghiou. 2002. A new "industrial ecology."
Science 296 (April).
Fraumeni, B. and S. Okubo. 2002.
R&D in the national income and product accounts: A first look
at its effect on GDP. Paper presented at the Conference on Measuring
Capital in the New Economy, April 2627, Washington, D.C. National
Bureau of Economic Research and Federal Reserve Board. Available
at http://www.bea.gov/bea/working_papers.htm.
Hagedoorn, J. 2001. Interfirm R&D partnership: An overview
of major trends and patterns since 1960. In J. E. Jankowski, A.
N. Link, and N. S. Vonortas, eds., Strategic Research Partnerships:
Proceedings of an NSF Workshop. NSF 01336. Arlington, VA: National
Science Foundation.
Hagerdoorn, J., A. N. Link, and N. S. Vonortas. 2000. Research
partnerships. Research Policy 29:567586.
Hall, B., and J. Van Reenen. 2000. How effective are fiscal incentives
for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy 29:449469.
Howells, J., and A. James. 2001. Corporate decision-making on the
sourcing of technological knowledge. Discussion Paper 01-01. Manchester,
U.K.: The University of Manchester Institute for Policy Research
in Engineering, Science, and Technology (PREST).
Industrial Research Institute (IRI). 2003. IRI's R&D trends
forecast for 2003. Research Technology Management 46(1):17.
Jankowski, J. 2001. Measurement and growth of R&D within the
service economy. Journal of Technology Transfer 26(4):323336.
Kaiser, F., A. M. Klemperer, A. Gorrnitzka, E. G. Schrier, B. J.
R. van der Meulen, and P. A. M. Maassen. 1999. Separating Teaching
and Research Expenditure in Higher Education. Overijssel, Netherlands:
University of Twente Center for Higher Education Policy Studies.
Knezo, G. J. 2002. Federal Research and Development Budgeting
and Priority-Setting Issues, 107th Congress. Issue Brief for
Congress, IB 10088. Washington, DC: U.S. Congressional Research
Service, Library of Congress.
Kuemmerle, W. 1999. Foreign direct investment in industrial research
in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries-Results from a
survey of multinational firms. Research Policy 28:17993.
Kumar, N. 2001. Determinants of location of overseas R&D activity
of multinational enterprises: The case of U.S. and Japanese corporations.
Research Policy 30:15974.
Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles-Management, Measurement, and Reporting.
Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Leyden, D. P., and A. N. Link. 1999. Federal laboratories as research
partners. International Journal of Industrial Organization 17:575592.
Link, A. N. 1999. Public/private partnerships in the United States.
Industry and Innovation 6(2):191217.
Link, A. N. 2003. Science parks indicators workshop. Final report
submitted to the National Science Foundation, Division of Science
Resources Statistics. University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Link, A. N. and K. R. Link. 2003. On the growth of U.S. science
parks. Journal of Technology Transfer 28:8185.
Meeks, R. 2002. Proposed FY
2003 Budget Would Complete Plan to Double Health R&D Funding,
Considerably Expand Defense R&D. NSF InfoBrief 02326. Washington,
DC: National Science Foundation. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infbrief/nsf02326/.
Mowery, D. C. 1983. The relationship between intrafirm and contractual
forms of industrial research in American manufacturing, 19001940.
Explorations in Economic History 20:351374.
Nakamura. L. 2001. Investing
in intangibles: Is a trillion dollars missing from GDP? Business
Review Q4:2737. Available at http://www.phil.frb.org/econ/br/br01.html.
National Academy of Sciences (NAS). 1995. Allocating Federal
Funds for Science and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) 1990. Federal
Register 55(24) (5 February): 3885.
National Research Council (NRC). 2000. Measuring the Science
and Engineering Enterprise. Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC). 2003. Government-Industry Partnerships
for the Development of New Technologies. Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
National Science Board (NSB). 1998. U.S. and international research
and development: Funds and alliances. Science and Engineering
Indicators - 1998. NSB-98-1. Arlington, VA: National Science
Foundation.
National Science Board (NSB). 2000. Science and Engineering
Indicators - 2000. Vol. I. NSB-00-1. Arlington, VA: National
Science Foundation.
National Science Board (NSB). 2002. U.S. and international research
and development: Funds and alliances. Science and Engineering
Indicators - 2002. Vol. I. NSB-02-1. Arlington, VA: National
Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation,
Division of Science Resources Statistics (NSF/SRS). 2002. Federal
Science and Engineering Support to Universities, Colleges, and Nonprofit
Institutions: Fiscal Year 2000. NSF 02319. Available at http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf02319/.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics
(NSF/SRS). Forthcoming. Federal Funds for Research and Development:
Fiscal Years 2001, 2002, 2003.
Nelson, R. 1959. The simple economics
of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 49:297306.
Niosi, J. 1999. The internationalization of industrial R&D:
From technology transfer to the learning organization. Research
Policy 28:10717.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
1996. Fiscal Measures to Promote R&D and Innovation. Paris.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
1999. Research and Development in Industry: Expenditure and Researchers,
Scientists and Engineers 197697. Paris.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2000. Science and Technology Main Indicators and Basic Statistics
in the Russian Federation 199298. Paris.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2001. Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard: Towards a
Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2002a. Analytical Business Enterprise Research and Development (ANBERD)
Database.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2002d. Main Science and Technology Indicators Database.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2002e. Measuring the Information Economy. Paris.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2002f. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and
Experimental Development (Frascati Manual). Paris.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
2002g. Science, Technology, and Industry Outlook. Paris.
Poterba, J., ed. 1997. Borderline Case: International Tax Policy,
Corporate Research and Development, and Investment. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.
Red Iberomericana de Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Iberomerican
Network on Science & Technology Indicators) (RICYT). 2002. Principales
Indicadores de Ciencia Y Tenologia 2001. Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rosenberg, N., and R. R. Nelson. 1994. American universities and
technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23:323348.
Schacht, W. H. 2000. Patent ownership and Federal research and
development: A discussion on the Bayh-Dole Act and the Stevenson-Wydler
Act. U.S. Congressional Research Service Report RL30320. Washington,
DC.
Schacht, W. H. 2003. Cooperative R&D: Federal Efforts to
Promote Industrial Competitiveness. Issue Brief for Congress,
IB 89056. Washington, DC: U.S. Congressional Research Service, Library
of Congress.
Steelman, J. R. 1947. Science and Public Policy. Washington,
DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Reprinted 1980. New York: Arno
Press.
Tassey, G. 1996. Choosing government R&D policies: Tax incentives
vs. direct funding. Review of Industrial Organization 11(5):579600.
Tassey, G. 1997. The Economics of R&D Policy. Westport,
CT: Quorum Books.
Tassey, G. 1999. R&D Trends in the U.S. Economy:
Strategies and Policy Implications. Gaithersburg, MD: U.S. Department
of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards
and Technology.
U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis
(U.S. BEA). 2003. Industry accounts data: Gross domestic product
by industry. http://www.bea.gov/bea/dn2/gpoc.htm.
Accessed 25 March 2003.
U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), Office of the Secretary. 2002.
Summary Report on Federal Laboratory Technology Transfer, 2002:
Report to the President and the Congress Under the Technology Transfer
and Commercialization Act. Washington, DC.
U.S. Department of Commerce,
Technology Administration (U.S. DOC/TA). 2002. U.S. Corporate
R&D Investment, 19942000 Final Estimates. Available at
http://www.ta.doc.gov/Reports.htm.
U.S. General Accounting Office (U.S. GAO). 2001a. Federal Research
and Development: Contributions to and Results of the Small Business
Technology Transfer Program. GAO-01-867T. Washington, DC.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2001b. Research and Development:
Reported Gap Between Data From Federal Agencies and Their R&D
Performers: Results From Noncomparable Data. GAO-01-512R. Washington,
DC.
U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 2002. Technology Transfer-Several
Factors Have Led to a Decline in Partnerships at DOE's Laboratories.
GAO-02-465. Washington, DC.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB) 2000. Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government,
Fiscal Year 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB). 2001. Analytical
Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government,
Fiscal Year 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB). 2003a. Analytical
Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government,
Fiscal Year 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (U.S. OMB). 2003b. Budget
of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2004.
Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
van Beuzekom, B. 2001. Biotechnology statistics in OECD member
countries: Compendium of existing national statistics. Working Paper
2001/6. Paris: Directorate for Science, Technology, and Industry
(STI), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
von Zedtwitz, M., and O. Gassmann. 2002. Market versus technology
drive in R&D internationalization: Four different patterns of
managing research and development. Research Policy 31:569588.
Vonortas, N. S. 1997. Cooperation in Research and Development.
Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Ward, M. 1985. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures
in the OECD. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development.
Zeile, W. J. 2002. U.S. affiliates of foreign companies-Operations
in 2000. Survey of Current Business August: 149166.
|