The Nation's Report Card:
|
District | Grade 4 | Grade 8 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Since 2003 |
Since 2005 |
Since 2003 |
Since 2005 |
|
Atlanta
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Austin
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Boston
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Charlotte
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Chicago
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Cleveland
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
District of Columbia
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Houston
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Los Angeles
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
New York City
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
San Diego
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Indicates the score was higher in 2007. |
![]() |
Indicates the score was lower in 2007. |
![]() |
Indicates there was no significant change in the score in 2007. |
![]() |
District did not participate in 2003. |
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2007 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.
Context for Urban District ResultsIt is important to examine the results for each of the districts by race/ethnicity and family income status. There is generally a higher concentration of minority (races other than White) and lower-income families in these urban districts than in the nation as a whole. For example, Black and Hispanic students made up about 38 percent of fourth-graders in the nation, but between 56 and 92 percent of the fourth-graders across the 11 districts. At grade 8, between 49 and 100 percent of students in each of the participating districts were eligible for the National School Lunch Program (an indicator of poverty) in 2007, compared to 41 percent of eighth-graders nationally. In many cases, when scores for only Black, Hispanic, or lower-income students in the districts are compared with their peers nationally, students in the districts score comparably or higher. Additionally, over time these student groups are making gains. |
At grade 4, compared with 2003, scores were higher for
At grade 8, compared with 2003, scores were higher for
When results for only lower-income students in 2007 were compared at grade 4
When only scores for lower-income students were compared at grade 8
In 2007, fourth-graders in Austin, Boston, Charlotte, Houston, New York City, and San Diego scored higher on average than students in large central cities. Scores for fourth-graders in the other five districts were lower than the score for students in large central cities.
Eighth-graders in Austin, Boston, Charlotte, Houston, and San Diego scored higher, on average, than students in large central cities. Students in Atlanta, Chicago, Cleveland, the District of Columbia, and Los Angeles scored lower on average, and the score for eighth-graders in New York City was not significantly different from the score for students in large central cities.
Download sections of the report (or the complete report) in a PDF file for viewing and printing:
NCES 2008-452 Ordering information
Suggested Citation
Lutkus, A., Grigg, W., and Dion, G. (2007). The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment Mathematics 2007 (NCES 2008-452). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
For more information, see the results of the 2007 TUDA Mathematics results on the Nation's Report Card website.