Q:What
does the establishment of a new acquisition boundary mean?
A: The initial consequences of boundary
establishment are not as drastic as many people believe. Essentially,
boundary establishment draws a line on a map. The Service is authorized
to begin purchasing or otherwise acquiring an interest in lands
from willing sellers within this line. The boundary itself does
not give the Service any special jurisdiction or control over these
lands. Lands become part of the National Wildlife Refuge System
when they are purchased from willing sellers or placed under agreements
with willing participants. Some landowners choose not to sell, and
they continue to manage their lands as before. Others choose to
sell, donate, or enter into special agreements, and their lands
are added to the refuge. These lands can then be managed for the
protection of wildlife and habitat.
Q:What
happens if my property is included in an acquisition boundary and
I don't want to sell?
A: It is the policy of the Service
to purchase lands only from willing sellers. You should be unaffected
by the establishment of the new boundary, except for the fact that
a national wildlife refuge is now one of your neighbors.
Q:
Why can't you guarantee
how the refuge will be managed, and what uses will be allowed, before
you establish a new refuge acquisition boundary?
A:
To put it simply, we can't guarantee the specifics of refuge management
because we haven't yet asked you (the public) how you think it should
be managed. However, before the Service begins acquiring land, we
can tell you which wildlife-dependent recreational uses currently
occurring will be allowed to continue on that land.
Determining
how a refuge will be managed requires a similar process to that
required for establishing a new boundary. The boundary must be established
first; then the Service may begin developing a Comprehensive Conservation
Plan (CCP) that will guide the refuge for the next 10-15 years.
Public involvement is a critical part of CCP development, and you
will once again have an opportunity to express your opinions.
The
Conceptual Management Plan, released with the Environmental Assessment
documents, does describes the Service's vision of how the new refuge
or addition might be managed, as well as which uses will be allowed
during the interim period.
Q:
Will land-use and zoning change within the refuge boundary?
A:
Zoning and land-use regulations continue under the jurisdiction
of local government. The Fish and Wildlife Service acts as a landowner
and manages only its own property, or property in which it has acquired
an interest.
Q:
If I want to sell my land or otherwise make it part of the National
Wildlife Refuge System, what options do I have?
A: The Service acquires interest
in lands in a variety of ways: fee-title purchase, donation, lease,
conservation easement, and cooperative agreement/memorandum of understanding.
If you are interested in any of these options, and your land is
inside an acquisition boundary, please contact us and we will explain
the possibilities.
Q:
How does the Fish and Wildlife Service decide which public uses
will be allowed on a refuge?
A:
Legislation offers clear guidance for determining appropriate public
uses of refuge lands and waters. All uses of a refuge must be compatible
with the purposes for which that particular refuge is established.
Six
wildlife-dependent public uses have been given priority consideration
over other public uses. Priority public uses include hunting, fishing,
wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education
and interpretation. If these uses are determined to be compatible
with refuge purposes, and funds are available to manage them, they
will be allowed. The specifics of public use will be addressed in
a refuge's Comprehensive Conservation Plan.
Q:
How will tax revenues be affected if lands become part of the National
Wildlife Refuge System?
A:
It's true that the federal government does not pay property tax
on its own lands. Two factors help offset this potential hardship
to communities. First, refuge lands demand very little in the way
of expensive services or infrastructure from county government.
Second, under the provisions of the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act (Public
Law 95-469), the Service annually reimburses counties to compensate
for revenue lost as a result of acquisition of private property.
This law states that the Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) shall
pay to each county in which any area acquired in fee title is situated,
the greater of the following amounts:
- An
amount equal to the product of 75 cents multiplied by the total
acreage of that portion of the fee area which is located within
such county.
- An
amount equal to three-fourths of 1 percent of the fair market
value, as determined by the Secretary, for that portion of the
fee area which is located within such county.
- An
amount equal to 25 percent of the net receipts collected by the
Secretary in connection with the operation and management of such
fee area during such fiscal year. However, if a fee area is located
in two or more counties, the amount for each county shall be apportioned
in relationship to the acreage in that county.
There
have been occasions when payments to the counties have been less
than the legislated amounts because of funding deficits. Congress
may appropriate, through the budget process, supplemental funds
to compensate local governments for any shortfall in revenue sharing
payments. The Refuge Revenue Sharing Act also requires that Service
lands be reappraised every five years to ensure that payments to
local governments remain equitable. Payments under this Act would
be made only on lands which the Service acquires in fee title. On
lands where the Service acquires only partial interest through easement,
all taxes would remain the responsibility of the individual landowner. |
|