skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov

Previous Section

Content Last Revised: 9/30/64
---DISCLAIMER---

Next Section

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to ESA

Title 29  

Labor

 

Chapter I  

Office of the Secretary of Labor

 

 

Part 5  

Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (Also Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Nonconstruction Contracts Subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act

 

 

 

Subpart B  

Interpretation of the Fringe Benefits Provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act


29 CFR 5.29 - Specific fringe benefits.

  • Section Number: 5.29
  • Section Name: Specific fringe benefits.

    (a) The act lists all types of fringe benefits which the Congress 
considered to be common in the construction industry as a whole. These 
include the following: Medical or hospital care, pensions on retirement 
or death, compensation for injuries or illness resulting from 
occupational activity, or insurance to provide any of the foregoing, 
unemployment benefits, life insurance, disability and sickness 
insurance, or accident insurance, vacation and holiday pay, defrayment 
of costs of apprenticeship or other similar programs, or other bona fide 
fringe benefits, but only where the contractor or subcontractor is not 
required by other Federal, State, or local law to provide any of such 
benefits.
    (b) The legislative history indicates that it was not the intent of 
the Congress to impose specific standards relating to administration of 
fringe benefits. It was assumed that the majority of fringe benefits 
arrangements of this nature will be those which are administered in 
accordance with requirements of section 302(c)(5) of the National Labor 
Relations Act, as amended (S. Rep. No. 963, p. 5).
    (c) The term ``other bona fide fringe benefits'' is the so-called 
``open end'' provision. This was included so that new fringe benefits 
may be recognized by the Secretary as they become prevailing. It was 
pointed out that a particular fringe benefit need not be recognized 
beyond a particular area in order for the Secretary to find that it is 
prevailing in that area. (S. Rep. No. 963, p. 6).
    (d) The legislative reports indicate that, to insure against 
considering and giving credit to any and all fringe benefits, some of 
which might be illusory or not genuine, the qualification was included 
that such fringe benefits must be ``bona fide'' (H. Rep. No. 308, p. 4; 
S. Rep. No. 963, p. 6). No difficulty is anticipated in determining 
whether a particular fringe benefit is ``bona fide'' in the ordinary 
case where the benefits are those common in the construction industry 
and which are established under a usual fund, plan, or program. This 
would be typically the case of those fringe benefits listed in paragraph 
(a) of this section which are funded under a trust or insurance program. 
Contractors may take credit for contributions made under such 
conventional plans without requesting the approval of the Secretary of 
Labor under Sec. 5.5(a)(1)(iv).
    (e) Where the plan is not of the conventional type described in the 
preceding paragraph, it will be necessary for the Secretary to examine 
the facts and circumstances to determine whether they are ``bona fide'' 
in accordance with requirements of the act. This is
particularly true with respect to unfunded plans. Contractors or 
subcontractors seeking credit under the act for costs incurred for such 
plans must request specific permission from the Secretary under 
Sec. 5.5(a)(1)(iv).
    (f) The act excludes fringe benefits which a contractor or 
subcontractor is obligated to provide under other Federal, State, or 
local law. No credit may be taken under the act for the payments made 
for such benefits. For example, payment for workmen's compensation 
insurance under either a compulsory or elective State statute are not 
considered payments for fringe benefits under the Act. While each 
situation must be separately considered on its own merits, payments made 
for travel, subsistence or to industry promotion funds are not normally 
payments for fringe benefits under the Act. The omission in the Act of 
any express reference to these payments, which are common in the 
construction industry, suggests that these payments should not normally 
be regarded as bona fide fringe benefits under the Act.
Previous Section

Next Section



Phone Numbers