SOFIA - WRI Report 02-4036 - Inventory and Review of Aquifer Storage and Recovery in Southern Florida

Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]

Test date Produc-
tion well identifier Open interval tested (feet) Test type Moni-
toring well Pumping rate (gallons per minute) Length of test (hours) Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day) Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less) Leakance (1/day) Method of analysis Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot) Back-
ground measure-
ments Problems and comments

Broward County

Deerfield Beach West WTP

NR ASR-1 956-1,130¹ S -- 950-2,100 NR -- - -- -- 42.6-32.0 NR Step-drawdown test was performed prior to multiwell, but date of test was not given in report

12/10/92 ASR-1 956-1,130¹ M MW-1 1,200 5.7 24,200 1.33x10^-6 6.3x10^-2 H-J --

Broward County WTP 2A

11/21/96 ASR-1 995-1,200¹ S -- 1,050-2,950 8 - -- -- -- 90.6-51.1 Data collected for multiwell test but no information on whether corrections were made Walton method should give same transmissivity if no leakance as C-J method(?) Curve matches look okay

11/26/96 ASR-1 995-1,200¹ M MW-1 1,000 24 28,900 1.1x10^-4 None Walton --

11/26/96 ASR-1 995-1,200¹ M MW-1 1,000 24 37,200 5.3x10^-5 -- C-J --

11/26/96 ASR-1 995-1,200¹ M ASR-1 1,000 24 44,000 -- -- Theis Rec NR

9/19/96 MW-1 990-1,200¹ S -- 480 6 -- -- -- -- 20

Sprintree WTP

6/6/97 ASR-1 1,110-1,270¹ S -- 700-1,900 8 -- -- -- -- 18.4-16.5 NR Acidization of well done after step test and before constant rate test. Interpretation of recovery data favored late time data

7/28/97 ASR-1 1,110-1,270¹ R -- 2,115 48 5,700 -- -- Theis Rec 22.75

Fiveash WTP

1/12/98 FMW-1 998-1,028 P, R -- 160 4 4,700 -- -- Theis Rec 4.7 NR Third packer test showed apparent failure after about 10 minutes, which may have affected data. FMW-1 apparently not used in 24-hour test of ASR-1

1/13/98 FMW-1 998-1,042 P, R -- 160 4 8,000 -- -- Theis Rec 5

1/15/98 FMW-1 1,058-1,175¹ P -- 600 10 min 23,500 -- -- C-J 46

3/16/98 FMW-1 1,055-1,175¹ S -- 100-160 4 -- -- -- -- 3.8-3.6

3/17/98 FMW-1 1,055-1,175¹ S -- 164 24 NR -- -- -- ~3.5

3/25/98 ASR-1 1,055-1,200¹ S -- 968-2,104 4 -- -- -- -- 25.5-17.7

3/30/98 ASR-1 1,055-1,200¹ R -- 2,100 24 19,500 -- -- Theis Rec ~17.5

Charlotte County

Shell Creek WtP

11/5/97 ASR-1 700-755 P -- 300-550 NR -- -- -- -- 10.0-5.6 NR

11/17/97 ASR-1 700-764 S -- 231-597 12 -- -- -- -- 5.3-4.6

11/18/97 ASR-1 700-764 R -- 546 54 1,300 -- -- SC 4.4

6/28/99 ASR-1 764-933¹ S -- 610-600 8 -- -- -- -- 10.6

Englewood South Regional WWTP

NR TPW-1 563-583 P, R -- 10 1.33 450 -- -- Theis Rec 1 NR Multiwell aquifer test planned in the future

3/7/00 TPW-1 630-807 P -- 131 4 1,300 -- -- SC 5

3/31/00 TPW-1 507-700¹ S -- 490-1,050 NR 4,700 -- -- SC 17.34 (avg)

4/20/00 SZMW-1 510-700¹ S -- 31-101 NR 3,700 -- -- SC 13.87 (avg)

4/18/00 IMW-1 280-320 S -- 28.3-59.5 NR 2,300 -- -- SC 5.5-4.0

4/18/00 SMW-1 170-205 S -- 9.3-17.7 NR 300 -- -- SC 1 (avg)

Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]

Test date Produc-
tion well identifier Open interval tested (feet) Test type Moni-
toring well Pumping rate (gallons per minute) Length of test (hours) Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day) Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less) Leakance (1/day) Method of analysis Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot) Back-
ground measure-
ments Problems and comments

Collier County

Manatee Road

11-90 MW-A 360-460 P, S -- NR NR 2,400 -- -- See comment NR NR All of the step-drawdown tests are indicated to be packer tests; however, some could have been a test of an open interval below casing. For step test, transmissivity was determined at each step by an unspecified method in Walton (1970). Then an adjusted e

11-90 MW-A 465-530¹ P, S -- NR NR 20,000 -- -- See comment NR

11-90 MW-A 680-760 P, S -- NR NR 15,000 -- -- See comment NR

11-90 MW-A 930-1020 P, S -- NR NR 6,700 -- -- See comment NR

11-90 MW-A 1,180-1,220 P, S -- NR NR 6,300 -- -- See comment NR

11-90 MW-A 1,345-1,606 P, S -- NR NR 5,700 -- -- See comment NR

NR ASR-1 465-528¹ M MW-B 670 17 9,400 1.00x10^-4 3.7x10^-4 H-J --

NR ASR-1 465-528 M MW-B 670 17 12,000 -- -- Theis Rec --

Marco Lakes

NR DZMW 296-399 S -- 220-600 NR 67,000 -- -- Walton 220-170 NR Estimated transmissivity in lower Hawthorn zone I (550 to 622 feet) was too low for consideration as an aquifer storage and recovery interval. No dates were reported for any tests. Good agreement between tests

NR DZMW 296-399 R -- 600 3 42,400 -- -- Theis Rec NR

NR DZMW 550-622 P, R -- 5 4 47 -- -- Theis Rec NR

NR DZMW 745-811¹ R -- 187 4.5 8,200 -- -- Theis Rec NR

NR ASR-1 745-790¹ M ASR-1 463 8.3 16,300 -- -- Theis Rec NR

NR ASR-1 745-790¹ M DZMW 463 8.3 9,100 6.5x10^-5 7x10^-4 H-J --

NR ASR-1 745-790¹ M DZMW 463 8.3 12,000 -- -- Theis Rec --

NR ASR-2 736-780¹ S ASR-1 400-650 NR -- -- -- -- 25-24

NR ASR-3 736-780¹ S, M ASR-2, ASRZMW 400-820 NR 8,000 to 8,100 -- -- C-J 17.4-15

Lee County

Lee County WTP

NR ASR-1 445-600¹ M NR 350 48 800 1.00x10^-4 1.0x10^-2 H-J NR NR Storage zone in ASR-1 is located in the lower Hawthorn producing zone of the Upper Floridan aquifer as defined by Reese (2000)

Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]

Test date Produc-
tion well identifier Open interval tested (feet) Test type Moni-
toring well Pumping rate (gallons per minute) Length of test (hours) Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day) Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less) Leakance (1/day) Method of analysis Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot) Back-
ground measure-
ments Problems and comments

Lee County--Continued

Corkscrew WTP

08-94 MW-A 428-515 P -- NR NR 500 -- -- SC 2.5 Data collected for multiwell test in September 1995 Test of MW-A, interval 744 to 778 feet, was of upper 34 of 240 feet thick Suwannee Limestone. Second multiwell test of ASR-1 followed back-plugging of MW-A to injection zone.Transmissivity values for step-drawdown test of ASR-2, 3, 4, and 5 were obtained b

8/17/94 MW-A 524-578 P -- 39 5 min. 500 -- -- SC NR

8/24/94 MW-A 744-778 P, S -- 15-72 4 13,000 -- -- SC 1.3-0.6

NR MW-B 452-504 NR -- NR NR 100 NR NR NR NR

09-95 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-C 400 115.5 3,410 7.70x10^-5 1.6x10^-5 Hantush --

09-95 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-C 400 115.5 3,380 6.70x10^-5 -- C-J --

09-95 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-C 400 115.5 3,460 -- -- Theis Rec --

06-96 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-A 415 120 1,760 2.30x10^-4 -- Theis --

06-96 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-A 415 120 1,900 1.70x10^-4 -- C-J --

06-96 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-C 415 120 3,180 5.70x10^-5 -- Theis --

06-96 ASR-1 328-397¹ M MW-C 415 120 3,410 4.90x10^-5 -- C-J --

7/13/99 ASR-2 337-397¹ S -- 115-410 NR 2,040 -- -- SC 7.8-6.6

2/12/99 ASR-3 285-347¹ S -- 129-497 NR 7,350 -- -- SC 26.9-19.4

6/25/99 ASR-4 310-368¹ S -- 153-450 NR 4,020 -- -- SC 15.0-11.7

7/8/99 ASR-5 253-291¹ S -- 163-380 NR - -- -- - 7.4-5.2

7/20/99 ASR-5 253-291¹ S -- 130-490 NR 13,400 -- -- SC 50.0-36.1

North Reservoir

12/7/98 MW-1 480-518 S -- 92-430 NR 14,400 -- -- SC 44.4-41.3 Data collected for 3 days prior to the multiwell test Fit of line to ASR-1 recovery data for multiwell test is poor

12/9/98 MW-1 529-619¹ P, S -- 73-295 NR 5,200 -- -- SC 9.7-3.5

12/11/98 MW-1 640-703 P, S -- 79-281 NR 2,040 -- -- SC 6.6-2.8

12/16/98 MW-1 808-890 P, S -- 55-190 NR 680 -- -- SC 2.8-1.8

12/18/98 MW-1 904-977 P, S -- 85-322 NR 9,590 -- -- SC 10.5-3.1

3/3/99 ASR-1 540-642¹ S -- 162-590 4 2,220 -- -- SC 8.65-7.00

3/8/99 ASR-1 540-642¹ M MW-1 379 72 8,290 3.27x10^-4 7.33x10^-4 H-J --

3/8/99 ASR-1 540-642¹ M MW-1 379 72 8,740 4.64x10^-4 - - C-J (recovery) --

3/8/99 ASR-1 540-642¹ M ASR-1 379 72 8,570 -- - - C-J (recovery) NR

Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]

Test date Produc-
tion well identifier Open interval tested (feet) Test type Moni-
toring well Pumping rate (gallons per minute) Length of test (hours) Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day) Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less) Leakance (1/day) Method of analysis Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot) Back-
ground measure-
ments Problems and comments

Lee County--Continued

Winkler Avenue

NR ASR-1 455-554¹ S -- 135 15 min -- -- -- -- 59.7 Ninety hours collected prior to multiwell test, but apparently not used to correct drawdown data Pumping rate for multiwell test was 1,540 for first 6.5 hours, then changed to 1,400. No attempt was made to analyze multiwell test data for storage coefficient or leakance. Storage zone is located in the lower Hawthorn producing zone of the Upper Florida

NR ASR-1 455-647 S -- 160 15 min -- -- -- -- 86.3

6/16/99 ASR-1 455-574¹ P -- 479 70 min 29,100 -- -- C-J (recovery) NR

6/17/99 ASR-1 455-575¹ P -- 483 18 min 26,600 -- -- C-J (recovery) NR

10/23/99 ASR-1 455-553¹ M ASR-1 1540-1400 27 24,700 -- -- C-J NR

10/23/99 ASR-1 455-553¹ M ASR-1 1540-1400 27 25,400 -- -- C-J (recovery) --

10/23/99 ASR-1 455-553¹ M SZMW-1 1540-1400 27 27,400 NR NR C-J --

10/23/99 ASR-1 455-553¹ M SZMW-1 1540-1400 27 29,000 -- -- C-J (recovery) --

San Carlos Estates

6/7/99 TPW-1 650-701¹ S -- 710-1,480 8 -- -- -- -- 250-130 Unknown for multiwell test. Test followed 10 days of recharge at 1,955 gallons per minute and then 6-day static period. High specific capacity in TPW-1 due to two pilot holes in open interval. Pumping rate for test on 11/10/99 of 985 gallons per minute was natural flow.
C-J solution for drawdown in SZMW-1R is suspect. Solution is for very late time only, and background changes due to prior recharge may have affected response

7/29/99 SZMW-1R 659-721¹ S -- 170-350 8 -- -- -- -- 15-9.0

8/2/99 SMW-1 234-321 S -- 150-220 8 -- -- -- -- 8.9-6.5

11/10/99 TPW-1 650-701¹ M SZMW-1R 985 8 39,000 1.00x10^-2 -- C-J --

11/10/99 TPW-1 650-701¹ M SZMW-1R 985 8 70,000 -- -- Theis Rec --

Olga WTP

1/5/99 MW-1 515-605 S -- 110-400 NR 2,500 -- -- SC NR Measured for multiwell test, but unknown if used to correct drawdown H-J results for multiwell test agree better with single well and packer test than C-J results. A second constant rate test was run but is not reported here. Storage zone is about 150 feet below top of Suwannee Limestone

1/7/99 MW-1 612-689 P -- 70-200 NR 1,300 -- -- SC NR

2/3/99 MW-1 835-935¹ P -- 70-355 NR 7,600 -- -- SC NR

2/4/99 MW-1 710-935 P -- 70-350 NR 7,600 -- -- SC NR

2/4/99 MW-1 835-935¹ P -- 70-350 NR 7,600 -- -- SC NR

2/8/99 MW-1 945-1,101 P -- 6 to 15 NR 33 -- -- SC NR

3/17/99 MW-3 740-820 S -- 78-480 NR 1,900 -- -- SC NR

3/25/99 MW-3 830-945¹ P -- 80-340 NR 9,000 -- -- SC NR

3/25/99 MW-3 854-945¹ P -- 75-350 NR 6,400 -- -- SC NR

3/26/99 MW-3 857-945¹ R -- 300 NR 8,700 -- -- Theis Rec NR

11/1/99 ASR-1 859-920¹ S -- 112-545 5 5,000 -- -- SC 14.9-8.5

11/3/99 ASR-1 859-920¹ M MW-1 500 60 7,200 5.10x10^-5 5.2x10^-3 H-J --

11/3/99 ASR-1 859-920¹ M MW-1 500 60 12,000 4.10x10^-5 -- C-J --

11/3/99 ASR-1 859-920¹ M MW-3 500 60 9,400 5.50x10^-5 6.0x10^-2 H-J --

11/3/99 ASR-1 859-920¹ M MW-3 500 60 11,000 4.20x10^-4 -- C-J --

Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]

Test date Produc-
tion well identifier Open interval tested (feet) Test type Moni-
toring well Pumping rate (gallons per minute) Length of test (hours) Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day) Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less) Leakance (1/day) Method of analysis Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot) Back-
ground measure-
ments Problems and comments

Miami-Dade County

Hialeah

2/10/75 MW-1 953-1,060¹ M ASR-1 250 1.66 11,000 8.4x10^-5 -- J-L -- NR Transmissivity estimate from Meyer (1989b). Storage coefficient estimated by model simulation of pumping test

West Well Field

1/26/97 ASR-1 850-1,302¹ S -- 1,400-4,000 8 -- -- -- -- 269-52.1 Measured for multiwell test. Correction was not done, due to negligibility. All three aquifer storage and recovery wells were heavily acidized prior to all tests. Late time drawdown data problematic because of pump going down several times.

2/25/97 ASR-2 845-1,250¹ S -- 1,500-3,800 8 -- -- -- -- 126.6-51.1

4/8/97 ASR-3 835-1,210¹ S -- 1,500-3,800 8 -- -- -- -- 46.1-38.2

12/9/97 ASR-1 850-1,302¹ M ASR-1 3,500 72 10,300 N/A N/A C-J NR

12/9/97 ASR-1 850-1,302¹ M ASR-2 3,500 72 15,400 3.90x10^-4 1.6x10^-3 Walton --

12/9/97 ASR-1 850-1,302¹ M ASR-2 3,500 72 18,200 2.90x10^-4 N/A C-J --

12/9/97 ASR-1 850-1,302¹ M ASR-3 3,500 72 15,400 4.40x10^-4 3.9x10^-5 Walton --

12/9/97 ASR-1 850-1,302¹ M ASR-3 3,500 72 19,700 3.30x10^-4 N/A C-J --

Monroe County

Marathon

5/3/90 ASR-1 387-432¹ M OW-1 105 25 2,290 3.20x10^-4 NR Walton -- Measured for 3 weeks prior to multiwell test. A regional increasing trend in water level was determined Leakance using Walton (1962) method not determined

5/3/90 ASR-1 387-432¹ M OW-1 105 25 2,510 3.70x10^-4 -- C-J --

5/3/90 ASR-1 387-432¹ M OW-1 105 25 1,760 -- -- Theis-Rec --

5/3/90 ASR-1 387-432¹ M OW-2 105 25 2,180 5.20x10^-4 NR Walton --

5/3/90 ASR-1 387-432¹ M OW-2 105 25 4,090 -- -- Theis-Rec --

5/6/90 ASR-1 387-432¹ S -- 95-350 NR -- -- -- -- 3.9-2.7

Okeechobee County

Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough (Lake Okeechobee)

4/20/98 MW-1 1,175-1,227 P -- 10 6.4 706 NR -- C-J NR Water-level data taken for 5 days prior to constant rate test; corrections made using a long-term increasing trend Leakance derived by extrapolation; longer pumping period required for more accurate value

4/20/98 MW-1 1,175-1,227 P, R -- 10 6.4 2,940 -- -- Recovery NR

8/2/98 ASR-1 1,268-1,710¹ M ASR-1 6,500 24 620,000 N/A N/A C-J (recovery) 1,600

8/2/98 ASR-1 1,268-1,710¹ M MW-1 6,500 24 586,000 1.25x10^-3 0.01-0.001 H-J 1,600

8/2/98 ASR-1 1,268-1,710¹ M MW-1 6,500 24 765,000 1.90x10^-4 N/A C-J (recovery) 1,600

Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued)
[Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]

Test date Produc-
tion well identifier Open interval tested (feet) Test type Moni-
toring well Pumping rate (gallons per minute) Length of test (hours) Transmis-
sivity (square feet per day) Storage coeffi-
cient (unit-
less) Leakance (1/day) Method of analysis Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot) Back-
ground measure-
ments Problems and comments

Palm Beach County

Boynton Beach East WTP

4/9/92 ASR-1 804-900¹ S -- 320-2,100 NR 6,800-13,000 NR -- C-J 18-28 NR Second step test is with permanent equipment installed in well. Average of estimates for transmissivity was 70,000 gallons per day per foot

10/15/92 ASR-1 804-909¹ S -- 798-1,723 NR Not calculated -- -- C-J 29-27

Delray Beach North Storage Reservoir

6/5/96 ASR-1 849-899 P -- 49 NR -- -- -- -- 0.37 NR Second step test performed after acidization of well. For the second step test, pump malfunctioned after about 10 minutes of pumping during the last step at 2,550 gallons per minute

6/11/96 ASR-1 900-952 P -- 83 NR -- -- -- -- 0.9

6/14/96 ASR-1 974-1,020 P -- 90 NR -- -- -- -- 2.4

6/18/96 ASR-1 1,020-1,100 P -- 98 NR -- -- -- -- 2

9/20/96 ASR-1 1,020-1,200¹ S -- 575-1,100 24 -- -- -- -- 10.8-7.8

2/24/98 ASR-1 1,020-1,200¹ S -- 760-2,550 13.2 -- -- -- -- 17.2-15.7

West Palm Beach WTP

8/22/96 FAMW 975-1,091 P, S -- 64-142 NR -- -- -- -- 194-86 NR Recovery was allowed following step test of ASR-1 before multiwell test was begun. Large deviation from Theis curve during late time, but leaky aquifer solution not used

9/14/96 FAMW 1,304-1,384 P, S -- 55-110 NR -- -- -- -- 220-110

8/29/96 FAMW 975-1,090 S -- 300-584 NR -- -- -- -- 75-58

9/1/96 FAMW 975-1,190¹ S -- 300-584 NR -- -- -- -- 110-101

9/4/96 FAMW 975-1,290 S -- 550-740 NR -- -- -- -- 116-105

9/6/96 FAMW 975-1,384 S -- 550-740 NR -- -- -- -- 116-99

11/19/96 FAMW 975-1,191¹ S -- 550-732 NR -- -- -- -- 62-42

1/30/97 ASR-1 985-1,200¹ S -- 508-704 24 -- -- -- -- 390-306

2/1/97 ASR-1 985-1,200¹ M FAMW 700 24 138,000 1.00x10^-4 -- C-J --

2/1/97 ASR-1 985-1,200¹ M FAMW 700 24 108,000 8.00x10^-4 -- Theis --

Western Hillsboro Canal, Site 1

4/5/00 EXW-1 1,160-1,225 P -- 95 NR -- -- -- -- 22.6 NR Acidized EXW-1 with 4,300 gallons of 36 percent HCl on 6-2-00

4/10/00 EXW-1 1,015-1,150 P -- 105 NR -- -- -- -- 10.9

5/25/00 EXW-1 1,015-1,225¹ S -- 1,000-3,000 NR -- -- -- -- 31.1-26.6

St. Lucie County

8/24/82 MW-1 600-775¹ M ASR-1 388 72 5,910 1.64x10^-4 4.3x10^-2 H-J (drawdown) -- NR Also conducted four pump tests of ASR-1 during drilling with total depth ranging from 627 to 1,000 feet and casing at 600 feet. Transmissivity was calculated from these tests based on recovery data from ASR-1

8/24/82 MW-1 600-775¹ M ASR-1 388 72 6,430 2.67x10^-4 4.7x10^-2 H-J (recovery) --

¹Open interval tested is the same (or about the same) as the storage zone.

Test date	Produc- tion well identifier	Open interval tested (feet)	Test type	Moni- toring well	Pumping rate (gallons per minute)	Length of test (hours)	Transmis- sivity (square feet per day)	Storage coeffi- cient (unit- less)	Leakance (1/day)	Method of analysis	Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)	Back- ground measure- ments	Problems and comments
Broward County
Deerfield Beach West WTP
NR	ASR-1	956-1,130¹	S	--	950-2,100	NR	--	-	--	--	42.6-32.0	NR	Step-drawdown test was performed prior to multiwell, but date of test was not given in report
12/10/92	ASR-1	956-1,130¹	M	MW-1	1,200	5.7	24,200	1.33x10^-6	6.3x10^-2	H-J	--
Broward County WTP 2A
11/21/96	ASR-1	995-1,200¹	S	--	1,050-2,950	8	-	--	--	--	90.6-51.1	Data collected for multiwell test but no information on whether corrections were made	Walton method should give same transmissivity if no leakance as C-J method(?) Curve matches look okay
11/26/96	ASR-1	995-1,200¹	M	MW-1	1,000	24	28,900	1.1x10^-4	None	Walton	--
11/26/96	ASR-1	995-1,200¹	M	MW-1	1,000	24	37,200	5.3x10^-5	--	C-J	--
11/26/96	ASR-1	995-1,200¹	M	ASR-1	1,000	24	44,000	--	--	Theis Rec	NR
9/19/96	MW-1	990-1,200¹	S	--	480	6	--	--	--	--	20
Sprintree WTP
6/6/97	ASR-1	1,110-1,270¹	S	--	700-1,900	8	--	--	--	--	18.4-16.5	NR	Acidization of well done after step test and before constant rate test. Interpretation of recovery data favored late time data
7/28/97	ASR-1	1,110-1,270¹	R	--	2,115	48	5,700	--	--	Theis Rec	22.75
Fiveash WTP
1/12/98	FMW-1	998-1,028	P, R	--	160	4	4,700	--	--	Theis Rec	4.7	NR	Third packer test showed apparent failure after about 10 minutes, which may have affected data. FMW-1 apparently not used in 24-hour test of ASR-1
1/13/98	FMW-1	998-1,042	P, R	--	160	4	8,000	--	--	Theis Rec	5
1/15/98	FMW-1	1,058-1,175¹	P	--	600	10 min	23,500	--	--	C-J	46
3/16/98	FMW-1	1,055-1,175¹	S	--	100-160	4	--	--	--	--	3.8-3.6
3/17/98	FMW-1	1,055-1,175¹	S	--	164	24	NR	--	--	--	~3.5
3/25/98	ASR-1	1,055-1,200¹	S	--	968-2,104	4	--	--	--	--	25.5-17.7
3/30/98	ASR-1	1,055-1,200¹	R	--	2,100	24	19,500	--	--	Theis Rec	~17.5
Charlotte County
Shell Creek WtP
11/5/97	ASR-1	700-755	P	--	300-550	NR	--	--	--	--	10.0-5.6	NR
11/17/97	ASR-1	700-764	S	--	231-597	12	--	--	--	--	5.3-4.6
11/18/97	ASR-1	700-764	R	--	546	54	1,300	--	--	SC	4.4
6/28/99	ASR-1	764-933¹	S	--	610-600	8	--	--	--	--	10.6
Englewood South Regional WWTP
NR	TPW-1	563-583	P, R	--	10	1.33	450	--	--	Theis Rec	1	NR	Multiwell aquifer test planned in the future
3/7/00	TPW-1	630-807	P	--	131	4	1,300	--	--	SC	5
3/31/00	TPW-1	507-700¹	S	--	490-1,050	NR	4,700	--	--	SC	17.34 (avg)
4/20/00	SZMW-1	510-700¹	S	--	31-101	NR	3,700	--	--	SC	13.87 (avg)
4/18/00	IMW-1	280-320	S	--	28.3-59.5	NR	2,300	--	--	SC	5.5-4.0
4/18/00	SMW-1	170-205	S	--	9.3-17.7	NR	300	--	--	SC	1 (avg)
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued) [Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date	Produc- tion well identifier	Open interval tested (feet)	Test type	Moni- toring well	Pumping rate (gallons per minute)	Length of test (hours)	Transmis- sivity (square feet per day)	Storage coeffi- cient (unit- less)	Leakance (1/day)	Method of analysis	Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)	Back- ground measure- ments	Problems and comments
Collier County
Manatee Road
11-90	MW-A	360-460	P, S	--	NR	NR	2,400	--	--	See comment	NR	NR	All of the step-drawdown tests are indicated to be packer tests; however, some could have been a test of an open interval below casing. For step test, transmissivity was determined at each step by an unspecified method in Walton (1970). Then an adjusted e
11-90	MW-A	465-530¹	P, S	--	NR	NR	20,000	--	--	See comment	NR
11-90	MW-A	680-760	P, S	--	NR	NR	15,000	--	--	See comment	NR
11-90	MW-A	930-1020	P, S	--	NR	NR	6,700	--	--	See comment	NR
11-90	MW-A	1,180-1,220	P, S	--	NR	NR	6,300	--	--	See comment	NR
11-90	MW-A	1,345-1,606	P, S	--	NR	NR	5,700	--	--	See comment	NR
NR	ASR-1	465-528¹	M	MW-B	670	17	9,400	1.00x10^-4	3.7x10^-4	H-J	--
NR	ASR-1	465-528	M	MW-B	670	17	12,000	--	--	Theis Rec	--
Marco Lakes
NR	DZMW	296-399	S	--	220-600	NR	67,000	--	--	Walton	220-170	NR	Estimated transmissivity in lower Hawthorn zone I (550 to 622 feet) was too low for consideration as an aquifer storage and recovery interval. No dates were reported for any tests. Good agreement between tests
NR	DZMW	296-399	R	--	600	3	42,400	--	--	Theis Rec	NR
NR	DZMW	550-622	P, R	--	5	4	47	--	--	Theis Rec	NR
NR	DZMW	745-811¹	R	--	187	4.5	8,200	--	--	Theis Rec	NR
NR	ASR-1	745-790¹	M	ASR-1	463	8.3	16,300	--	--	Theis Rec	NR
NR	ASR-1	745-790¹	M	DZMW	463	8.3	9,100	6.5x10^-5	7x10^-4	H-J	--
NR	ASR-1	745-790¹	M	DZMW	463	8.3	12,000	--	--	Theis Rec	--
NR	ASR-2	736-780¹	S	ASR-1	400-650	NR	--	--	--	--	25-24
NR	ASR-3	736-780¹	S, M	ASR-2, ASRZMW	400-820	NR	8,000 to 8,100	--	--	C-J	17.4-15
Lee County
Lee County WTP
NR	ASR-1	445-600¹	M	NR	350	48	800	1.00x10^-4	1.0x10^-2	H-J	NR	NR	Storage zone in ASR-1 is located in the lower Hawthorn producing zone of the Upper Floridan aquifer as defined by Reese (2000)
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued) [Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date	Produc- tion well identifier	Open interval tested (feet)	Test type	Moni- toring well	Pumping rate (gallons per minute)	Length of test (hours)	Transmis- sivity (square feet per day)	Storage coeffi- cient (unit- less)	Leakance (1/day)	Method of analysis	Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)	Back- ground measure- ments	Problems and comments
Lee County--Continued
Corkscrew WTP
08-94	MW-A	428-515	P	--	NR	NR	500	--	--	SC	2.5	Data collected for multiwell test in September 1995	Test of MW-A, interval 744 to 778 feet, was of upper 34 of 240 feet thick Suwannee Limestone. Second multiwell test of ASR-1 followed back-plugging of MW-A to injection zone.Transmissivity values for step-drawdown test of ASR-2, 3, 4, and 5 were obtained b
8/17/94	MW-A	524-578	P	--	39	5 min.	500	--	--	SC	NR
8/24/94	MW-A	744-778	P, S	--	15-72	4	13,000	--	--	SC	1.3-0.6
NR	MW-B	452-504	NR	--	NR	NR	100	NR	NR	NR	NR
09-95	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-C	400	115.5	3,410	7.70x10^-5	1.6x10^-5	Hantush	--
09-95	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-C	400	115.5	3,380	6.70x10^-5	--	C-J	--
09-95	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-C	400	115.5	3,460	--	--	Theis Rec	--
06-96	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-A	415	120	1,760	2.30x10^-4	--	Theis	--
06-96	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-A	415	120	1,900	1.70x10^-4	--	C-J	--
06-96	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-C	415	120	3,180	5.70x10^-5	--	Theis	--
06-96	ASR-1	328-397¹	M	MW-C	415	120	3,410	4.90x10^-5	--	C-J	--
7/13/99	ASR-2	337-397¹	S	--	115-410	NR	2,040	--	--	SC	7.8-6.6
2/12/99	ASR-3	285-347¹	S	--	129-497	NR	7,350	--	--	SC	26.9-19.4
6/25/99	ASR-4	310-368¹	S	--	153-450	NR	4,020	--	--	SC	15.0-11.7
7/8/99	ASR-5	253-291¹	S	--	163-380	NR	-	--	--	-	7.4-5.2
7/20/99	ASR-5	253-291¹	S	--	130-490	NR	13,400	--	--	SC	50.0-36.1
North Reservoir
12/7/98	MW-1	480-518	S	--	92-430	NR	14,400	--	--	SC	44.4-41.3	Data collected for 3 days prior to the multiwell test	Fit of line to ASR-1 recovery data for multiwell test is poor
12/9/98	MW-1	529-619¹	P, S	--	73-295	NR	5,200	--	--	SC	9.7-3.5
12/11/98	MW-1	640-703	P, S	--	79-281	NR	2,040	--	--	SC	6.6-2.8
12/16/98	MW-1	808-890	P, S	--	55-190	NR	680	--	--	SC	2.8-1.8
12/18/98	MW-1	904-977	P, S	--	85-322	NR	9,590	--	--	SC	10.5-3.1
3/3/99	ASR-1	540-642¹	S	--	162-590	4	2,220	--	--	SC	8.65-7.00
3/8/99	ASR-1	540-642¹	M	MW-1	379	72	8,290	3.27x10^-4	7.33x10^-4	H-J	--
3/8/99	ASR-1	540-642¹	M	MW-1	379	72	8,740	4.64x10^-4	- -	C-J (recovery)	--
3/8/99	ASR-1	540-642¹	M	ASR-1	379	72	8,570	--	- -	C-J (recovery)	NR
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued) [Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date	Produc- tion well identifier	Open interval tested (feet)	Test type	Moni- toring well	Pumping rate (gallons per minute)	Length of test (hours)	Transmis- sivity (square feet per day)	Storage coeffi- cient (unit- less)	Leakance (1/day)	Method of analysis	Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)	Back- ground measure- ments	Problems and comments
Lee County--Continued
Winkler Avenue
NR	ASR-1	455-554¹	S	--	135	15 min	--	--	--	--	59.7	Ninety hours collected prior to multiwell test, but apparently not used to correct drawdown data	Pumping rate for multiwell test was 1,540 for first 6.5 hours, then changed to 1,400. No attempt was made to analyze multiwell test data for storage coefficient or leakance. Storage zone is located in the lower Hawthorn producing zone of the Upper Florida
NR	ASR-1	455-647	S	--	160	15 min	--	--	--	--	86.3
6/16/99	ASR-1	455-574¹	P	--	479	70 min	29,100	--	--	C-J (recovery)	NR
6/17/99	ASR-1	455-575¹	P	--	483	18 min	26,600	--	--	C-J (recovery)	NR
10/23/99	ASR-1	455-553¹	M	ASR-1	1540-1400	27	24,700	--	--	C-J	NR
10/23/99	ASR-1	455-553¹	M	ASR-1	1540-1400	27	25,400	--	--	C-J (recovery)	--
10/23/99	ASR-1	455-553¹	M	SZMW-1	1540-1400	27	27,400	NR	NR	C-J	--
10/23/99	ASR-1	455-553¹	M	SZMW-1	1540-1400	27	29,000	--	--	C-J (recovery)	--
San Carlos Estates
6/7/99	TPW-1	650-701¹	S	--	710-1,480	8	--	--	--	--	250-130	Unknown for multiwell test. Test followed 10 days of recharge at 1,955 gallons per minute and then 6-day static period.	High specific capacity in TPW-1 due to two pilot holes in open interval. Pumping rate for test on 11/10/99 of 985 gallons per minute was natural flow. C-J solution for drawdown in SZMW-1R is suspect. Solution is for very late time only, and background changes due to prior recharge may have affected response
7/29/99	SZMW-1R	659-721¹	S	--	170-350	8	--	--	--	--	15-9.0
8/2/99	SMW-1	234-321	S	--	150-220	8	--	--	--	--	8.9-6.5
11/10/99	TPW-1	650-701¹	M	SZMW-1R	985	8	39,000	1.00x10^-2	--	C-J	--
11/10/99	TPW-1	650-701¹	M	SZMW-1R	985	8	70,000	--	--	Theis Rec	--
Olga WTP
1/5/99	MW-1	515-605	S	--	110-400	NR	2,500	--	--	SC	NR	Measured for multiwell test, but unknown if used to correct drawdown	H-J results for multiwell test agree better with single well and packer test than C-J results. A second constant rate test was run but is not reported here. Storage zone is about 150 feet below top of Suwannee Limestone
1/7/99	MW-1	612-689	P	--	70-200	NR	1,300	--	--	SC	NR
2/3/99	MW-1	835-935¹	P	--	70-355	NR	7,600	--	--	SC	NR
2/4/99	MW-1	710-935	P	--	70-350	NR	7,600	--	--	SC	NR
2/4/99	MW-1	835-935¹	P	--	70-350	NR	7,600	--	--	SC	NR
2/8/99	MW-1	945-1,101	P	--	6 to 15	NR	33	--	--	SC	NR
3/17/99	MW-3	740-820	S	--	78-480	NR	1,900	--	--	SC	NR
3/25/99	MW-3	830-945¹	P	--	80-340	NR	9,000	--	--	SC	NR
3/25/99	MW-3	854-945¹	P	--	75-350	NR	6,400	--	--	SC	NR
3/26/99	MW-3	857-945¹	R	--	300	NR	8,700	--	--	Theis Rec	NR
11/1/99	ASR-1	859-920¹	S	--	112-545	5	5,000	--	--	SC	14.9-8.5
11/3/99	ASR-1	859-920¹	M	MW-1	500	60	7,200	5.10x10^-5	5.2x10^-3	H-J	--
11/3/99	ASR-1	859-920¹	M	MW-1	500	60	12,000	4.10x10^-5	--	C-J	--
11/3/99	ASR-1	859-920¹	M	MW-3	500	60	9,400	5.50x10^-5	6.0x10^-2	H-J	--
11/3/99	ASR-1	859-920¹	M	MW-3	500	60	11,000	4.20x10^-4	--	C-J	--
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued) [Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date	Produc- tion well identifier	Open interval tested (feet)	Test type	Moni- toring well	Pumping rate (gallons per minute)	Length of test (hours)	Transmis- sivity (square feet per day)	Storage coeffi- cient (unit- less)	Leakance (1/day)	Method of analysis	Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)	Back- ground measure- ments	Problems and comments
Miami-Dade County
Hialeah
2/10/75	MW-1	953-1,060¹	M	ASR-1	250	1.66	11,000	8.4x10^-5	--	J-L	--	NR	Transmissivity estimate from Meyer (1989b). Storage coefficient estimated by model simulation of pumping test
West Well Field
1/26/97	ASR-1	850-1,302¹	S	--	1,400-4,000	8	--	--	--	--	269-52.1	Measured for multiwell test. Correction was not done, due to negligibility.	All three aquifer storage and recovery wells were heavily acidized prior to all tests. Late time drawdown data problematic because of pump going down several times.
2/25/97	ASR-2	845-1,250¹	S	--	1,500-3,800	8	--	--	--	--	126.6-51.1
4/8/97	ASR-3	835-1,210¹	S	--	1,500-3,800	8	--	--	--	--	46.1-38.2
12/9/97	ASR-1	850-1,302¹	M	ASR-1	3,500	72	10,300	N/A	N/A	C-J	NR
12/9/97	ASR-1	850-1,302¹	M	ASR-2	3,500	72	15,400	3.90x10^-4	1.6x10^-3	Walton	--
12/9/97	ASR-1	850-1,302¹	M	ASR-2	3,500	72	18,200	2.90x10^-4	N/A	C-J	--
12/9/97	ASR-1	850-1,302¹	M	ASR-3	3,500	72	15,400	4.40x10^-4	3.9x10^-5	Walton	--
12/9/97	ASR-1	850-1,302¹	M	ASR-3	3,500	72	19,700	3.30x10^-4	N/A	C-J	--
Monroe County
Marathon
5/3/90	ASR-1	387-432¹	M	OW-1	105	25	2,290	3.20x10^-4	NR	Walton	--	Measured for 3 weeks prior to multiwell test. A regional increasing trend in water level was determined	Leakance using Walton (1962) method not determined
5/3/90	ASR-1	387-432¹	M	OW-1	105	25	2,510	3.70x10^-4	--	C-J	--
5/3/90	ASR-1	387-432¹	M	OW-1	105	25	1,760	--	--	Theis-Rec	--
5/3/90	ASR-1	387-432¹	M	OW-2	105	25	2,180	5.20x10^-4	NR	Walton	--
5/3/90	ASR-1	387-432¹	M	OW-2	105	25	4,090	--	--	Theis-Rec	--
5/6/90	ASR-1	387-432¹	S	--	95-350	NR	--	--	--	--	3.9-2.7
Okeechobee County
Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough (Lake Okeechobee)
4/20/98	MW-1	1,175-1,227	P	--	10	6.4	706	NR	--	C-J	NR	Water-level data taken for 5 days prior to constant rate test; corrections made using a long-term increasing trend	Leakance derived by extrapolation; longer pumping period required for more accurate value
4/20/98	MW-1	1,175-1,227	P, R	--	10	6.4	2,940	--	--	Recovery	NR
8/2/98	ASR-1	1,268-1,710¹	M	ASR-1	6,500	24	620,000	N/A	N/A	C-J (recovery)	1,600
8/2/98	ASR-1	1,268-1,710¹	M	MW-1	6,500	24	586,000	1.25x10^-3	0.01-0.001	H-J	1,600
8/2/98	ASR-1	1,268-1,710¹	M	MW-1	6,500	24	765,000	1.90x10^-4	N/A	C-J (recovery)	1,600
Table 3. Hydraulic test data from aquifer storage and recovery well systems in southern Florida --(Continued) [Depths are in feet below land surface. Test type: M, multiwell constant rate; P, Packer test; R, single well constant rate recovery; S, step drawdown. Method of analysis: SC, specific capacity; Theis, Theis (1935) confined aquifer; C-J, Cooper and Jacob (1946) confined aquifer; Theis Rec, Theis (1935) residual drawdown recovery; H-J, Hantush and Jacob (1955) leaky aquifer; Walton, Walton (1962) leaky aquifer; J-L, Jacob and Lohman (1952). Other annotations: WTP, water treatment plant; WWTP, wastewater treatment plant; -, not applicable; NR, not reported]
Test date	Produc- tion well identifier	Open interval tested (feet)	Test type	Moni- toring well	Pumping rate (gallons per minute)	Length of test (hours)	Transmis- sivity (square feet per day)	Storage coeffi- cient (unit- less)	Leakance (1/day)	Method of analysis	Specific capacity (gallons per minute per foot)	Back- ground measure- ments	Problems and comments
Palm Beach County
Boynton Beach East WTP
4/9/92	ASR-1	804-900¹	S	--	320-2,100	NR	6,800-13,000	NR	--	C-J	18-28	NR	Second step test is with permanent equipment installed in well. Average of estimates for transmissivity was 70,000 gallons per day per foot
10/15/92	ASR-1	804-909¹	S	--	798-1,723	NR	Not calculated	--	--	C-J	29-27
Delray Beach North Storage Reservoir
6/5/96	ASR-1	849-899	P	--	49	NR	--	--	--	--	0.37	NR	Second step test performed after acidization of well. For the second step test, pump malfunctioned after about 10 minutes of pumping during the last step at 2,550 gallons per minute
6/11/96	ASR-1	900-952	P	--	83	NR	--	--	--	--	0.9
6/14/96	ASR-1	974-1,020	P	--	90	NR	--	--	--	--	2.4
6/18/96	ASR-1	1,020-1,100	P	--	98	NR	--	--	--	--	2
9/20/96	ASR-1	1,020-1,200¹	S	--	575-1,100	24	--	--	--	--	10.8-7.8
2/24/98	ASR-1	1,020-1,200¹	S	--	760-2,550	13.2	--	--	--	--	17.2-15.7
West Palm Beach WTP
8/22/96	FAMW	975-1,091	P, S	--	64-142	NR	--	--	--	--	194-86	NR	Recovery was allowed following step test of ASR-1 before multiwell test was begun. Large deviation from Theis curve during late time, but leaky aquifer solution not used
9/14/96	FAMW	1,304-1,384	P, S	--	55-110	NR	--	--	--	--	220-110
8/29/96	FAMW	975-1,090	S	--	300-584	NR	--	--	--	--	75-58
9/1/96	FAMW	975-1,190¹	S	--	300-584	NR	--	--	--	--	110-101
9/4/96	FAMW	975-1,290	S	--	550-740	NR	--	--	--	--	116-105
9/6/96	FAMW	975-1,384	S	--	550-740	NR	--	--	--	--	116-99
11/19/96	FAMW	975-1,191¹	S	--	550-732	NR	--	--	--	--	62-42
1/30/97	ASR-1	985-1,200¹	S	--	508-704	24	--	--	--	--	390-306
2/1/97	ASR-1	985-1,200¹	M	FAMW	700	24	138,000	1.00x10^-4	--	C-J	--
2/1/97	ASR-1	985-1,200¹	M	FAMW	700	24	108,000	8.00x10^-4	--	Theis	--
Western Hillsboro Canal, Site 1
4/5/00	EXW-1	1,160-1,225	P	--	95	NR	--	--	--	--	22.6	NR	Acidized EXW-1 with 4,300 gallons of 36 percent HCl on 6-2-00
4/10/00	EXW-1	1,015-1,150	P	--	105	NR	--	--	--	--	10.9
5/25/00	EXW-1	1,015-1,225¹	S	--	1,000-3,000	NR	--	--	--	--	31.1-26.6
St. Lucie County
8/24/82	MW-1	600-775¹	M	ASR-1	388	72	5,910	1.64x10^-4	4.3x10^-2	H-J (drawdown)	--	NR	Also conducted four pump tests of ASR-1 during drilling with total depth ranging from 627 to 1,000 feet and casing at 600 feet. Transmissivity was calculated from these tests based on recovery data from ASR-1
8/24/82	MW-1	600-775¹	M	ASR-1	388	72	6,430	2.67x10^-4	4.7x10^-2	H-J (recovery)	--
¹Open interval tested is the same (or about the same) as the storage zone.

Go back to Tables page

| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/wri/02-4036/table3.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 14 January, 2005 @ 11:09 AM (KP)