|
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S SEPTEMBER 28, 2000 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO REVIEW Plaintiff submits copies of the following documents which are cited in its Reply in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's September 28, 2000, Order: 1. A true and correct copy of the Declaration of Herbert Hovenkamp in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. 2. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶714.6, n.46 (Supp. 1986) is attached hereto as Exhibit 2. 3. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶740( Supp. 1999) is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. 4. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶714.6, n.51 and ¶715.2f (Supp. 1994) is attached hereto as Exhibit 4. 5. A true and correct copy of P. Areeda & H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶714.6, n.51 and ¶715.2f (Supp. 1996) is attached hereto as Exhibit 5. 6. A true and correct copy of an excerpt from the Maher Dep. Tr. is attached hereto as Exhibit 6. 7. A true and correct copy of Response to Interrogatory 4 of CID No. 15982 is attached hereto as Exhibit 7. (Filed under seal). 8. A true and correct copy of an excerpt from the Kalt Dep. Tr. is attached hereto as Exhibit 9. (Filed under seal). 9. A true and correct copy of an excerpt from the Baumol Dep. Tr. is attached hereto as Exhibit 10. (Filed under seal). 10. A true and correct copy of an excerpt from the Ordover Initial Expert Report is attached hereto as Exhibit 11. (Filed under seal). 11. A true and correct copy of the April 5, 1993, Letter from Mr. Gunn to Congressman
Glickman.
is attached hereto as Exhibit 12.
|