USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
publications > paper > paleoecology and ecosystem restoration: case studies from Chesapeake Bay and the Florida Everglades > Florida Everglades: hydrologic changes and environmental degradation

Paleoecology and Ecosystem Restoration: Case Studies from Chesapeake Bay and the Florida Everglades

Florida Everglades: Hydrologic Changes and Environmental Degradation

Home
Introduction
Climate Variability Impacts on Ecosys.
Degradation & Restoration in Chesapeake Bay
Baseline Variability: Chesapeake Bay
Chesapeake Bay WQ & Climate Variability
>FL Everglades: Hydro. Changes & Degradation
Everglades Climate Variability & Relevance
Role of Time in Restoration Planning
Acknowledgements
References
Figures
In the Florida Everglades and Florida and Biscayne Bays, land-use and water management practices dating as far back as the late 19th century have changed the distribution and composition of plant and animal communities throughout the system. The "predrainage" (pre-1900) Everglades were influenced primarily by seasonal rainfall and underlying topography. Overflow of water from Lake Okeechobee during the wet season produced seasonal sheet flow across the Everglades, draining into Florida Bay and Biscayne Bay. Wetland hydroperiods and water depths and estuarine salinity were primarily a function of precipitation. Human alteration of the natural hydrologic patterns of the Everglades began in the early 20th century with construction of canals and the Hoover Dike around Lake Okeechobee (Light and Dineen, 1994). A second wave of canal and levee construction in the 1950's and 1960's significantly changed the quantity and seasonality of freshwater flow through the wetland and fragmented the ecosystem. By the early 21st century, the spatial extent of the Everglades wetland had been reduced by approximately one half (Fig. 5) (Lodge, 2005).

These land-use changes also affected water delivery from the Everglades to adjacent marine ecosystems in Florida and Biscayne Bays. Hypersalinity and resulting seagrass dieoffs in Florida Bay were of particular concern and were attributed to decreased runoff of freshwater from canal building and water management (Robblee et al., 1991). In addition, increased nutrient loading from agricultural land use may have changed estuarine ecosystems from a clear water system with abundant benthic primary production to one with high turbidity and common algal blooms (Rudnick et al., 2005).

The degradation of wetlands and associated wildlife resulted in passage of the Everglades Forever Act in 1994, which aimed to restore healthy ecosystem function to the Everglades. More recently, the recognition that the health of the greater Everglades ecosystem and the quality and availability of water affected the economy and culture of south Florida prompted the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP) to restore natural hydroperiods, seasonality, and connectivity of the ecosystem through modification of existing water-control structures.

maps of Florida showing (a) pre-1900 AD vegetation; and, (b) 1992-1993 land cover
Figure 5. The Florida Everglades occupy ~10,000 km2 on the southern tip of Florida. Extensive land-cover changes since the early 20th century significantly changed wetland hydrology, plant community distribution, and substrate characteristics. The white line indicates the extent of the freshwater Everglades wetland. (modified from Lodge, 2005; Marshall et al., 2004). a) Reconstruction of pre-1900 AD vegetation is based on a combination of paleoecological proxies and historical references. b) 1992-93 land cover was derived from satellite images and modern vegetation maps. Modeling simulations indicate that land-cover changes alone were sufficient to increase diurnal temperature variability and decrease summer rainfall (Marshall et al., 2004). [larger image]


< Chesapeake Bay WQ & Climate Variability | Everglades Climate Variability & Relevance >



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/paleo_eco/flhydro_deg.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 11 February, 2008 @ 10:10 AM(KP)