U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

ESEA: Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies - 2005

CFDA Number: 84.010 - Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies


Program Goal: At-risk students improve their achievement to meet challenging standards.
Objective 8.1 of 3: The performance of low-income students will increase substantially in reading and mathematics.
Indicator 8.1.1 of 2: Fourth-grade reading proficiency: The number of states administering fourth-grade reading assessments that report an increase in the percentage of low-income students who perform at either the proficient or advanced performance levels will increase annually.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of fourth-grade low-income students meeting state performance standards by achieving proficiency or above in reading on state assessments.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005   25


Explanation: School year 2002-2003 was the first year for which states were required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated Performance Report. Actual performance data for 2005 will be obtained by comparing school year 2004-2005 data to school year 2003-2004 data.   		Additional Source Information: NCLB; State Performance Report; PBDMI

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2004 - 2005
Data Available: September 2006
Validated By: No Formal Verification.

 
Indicator 8.1.2 of 2: Eighth-grade mathematics proficiency: The number of states administering eighth-grade mathematics assessments that report an increase in the percentage of low-income students who perform at either the proficient or advanced performance levels will increase annually.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of eighth-grade low-income students meeting state performance standards by achieving proficiency or above in mathematics on state assessments.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005   25


Explanation: School year 2002-2003 is the first year for which states are required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated Performance Report. Actual performance data for 2005 will be obtained by comparing school year 2004-2005 data to school year 2003-2004 data.   		Additional Source Information: NCLB; State Performance Report; PBDMI

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2004 - 2005
Data Available: September 2006
Validated By: No Formal Verification.

 

Objective 8.2 of 3: AYP status
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Making AYP: Number of states that report an increase in schools making AYP.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The number of states reporting an increase in the percentage of schools making adequate yearly progress.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
2005
 
10


Explanation: School year 2002-2003 is the first year for which states are required to report data through the NCLB Consolidated Performance Report. Actual performance data for 2005 will be obtained by comparing school year 2004-2005 data to school year 2003-2004 data.   		Additional Source Information: NCLB Consolidated Performance Report; PBDMI

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2004 - 2005
Data Available: September 2006
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Contractor conducts edit checks.

 

Objective 8.3 of 3: Performance of low-income students in high-poverty schools will increase in reading and mathematics.
Indicator 8.3.1 of 2: NAEP Performance - Fourth-Grade Reading: The percentage of low-income fourth-grade students who score at or above Basic and at or above Proficient in reading on the NAEP.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The percentage of low-income fourth-grade students scoring at or above Basic and Proficient in reading on the NAEP.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
At or above Proficient At or above Basic
At or above Proficient At or above Basic
2000
13 39
   
2002
16 46
14 40
2003
15 44
15 41
2005
   
17 43


  		Additional Source Information: NCES - NAEP

Frequency: Biennially.
Collection Period: 2004 - 2005
Data Available: November 2005

Limitations: NAEP is not aligned with state assessments.

 
Indicator 8.3.2 of 2: NAEP Performance - Eighth-Grade Mathematics: The percentage of low-income eighth-grade students who score at or above Basic or at or above Proficient in mathematics on the NAEP.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
The percentage of low-income eighth-grade students scoring at or above Basic and Proficient in mathematics on the NAEP.
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
At or above Proficient At or above Basic
At or above Proficient At or above Basic
2000
10 41
   
2003
11 47
11 43
2005
   
13 45


  		Additional Source Information: NCES - NAEP

Frequency: Biennially.
Collection Period: 2004 - 2005
Data Available: November 2005

Limitations: NAEP is not aligned with state assessments.

 

Return to table of contents