Skip Navigation
small header image
The Condition of Education Indicator List Site Map/ Back to Home
Section Image Learner Outcomes
: Academic Outcomes
<<Previous Next>>
1.

Participation in Education

2.

Learner Outcomes

Introduction

Early Childhood Outcomes

Academic Outcomes

Reading Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

Mathematics Performance of Students in Grades 4 and 8

Writing Performance of Students in Grades 8 and 12

Economics Performance of Students in Grade 12

Trends in the Achievement Gaps in Reading and Mathematics

International Comparison of 4th- and 8th-Grade Performance in Mathematics

Poverty and Student Mathematics Achievement

Reading and Mathematics Score Trends by Age

Reading and Mathematics Achievement at 5th Grade

Student Reading and Mathematics Performance in Public Schools by Urbanicity

International Comparisons of Reading Literacy in Grade 4

International Comparisons of Mathematics Literacy

International Comparisons of Mathematics Cognitive Domains of 4th- and 8th-Graders

International Comparisons of Science Literacy

Science Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

International Comparison of 4th- and 8th-Grade Performance in Science

- U.S. History Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

Geography Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

Adult Literacy

Social and Cultural Outcomes

Economic Outcomes

3.

Student Effort and Educational Progress

4.

Contexts of Elementary and Secondary Education

5.

Contexts of Postsecondary Education



Bibliography

U.S. History Performance of Students in Grades 4, 8, and 12

The performance of 4th- and 8th-graders in U.S. history improved from 1994 to 2001. Eighteen percent of 4th-graders, 17 percent of 8th-graders, and 11 percent of 12th-graders performed at or above the Proficient level in 2001.

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) assessed the performance of 4th-, 8th-, and 12th-graders in U.S. history in 1994 and 2001. Average scale scores increased for 4th- and 8th-graders from 1994 to 2001; there was no significant change in the scale score of 12th-graders (see table 14-1).

NAEP also provides achievement levels indicating what students should know and be able to do in each grade. In 2001, 18 percent of 4th-graders, 17 percent of 8th-graders, and 11 percent of 12th-graders performed at or above the Proficient level, which is defined as "solid academic performance for each grade assessed." The percentage of 4th-graders performing at or above the Basic level was higher in 2001 than in 1994. At grade 8, the percentages of students at or above the Basic level, at or above the Proficient level, and at the Advanced level were higher in 2001 than in 1994. At grade 12, no significant differences were detected in the percentages of students performing at each level.

Scores at the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles reveal changes in scale scores for lower- and higher-performing students. At grade 4, scale scores at the 10th and 25th percentiles were higher in 2001 than in 1994. There were increases from 1994 to 2001 in the average 8th-grade scores among the lower and upper percentiles (25th, 75th, and 90th percentiles). There were no significant changes in 12th-grade scores by percentile between the 2 years.

In 2001, student performance differed among subgroups. At all three grades, White students on average had higher scores than Black, Hispanic, and American Indian students, and Asian/Pacific Islander students had higher average scores than Black and Hispanic students. At grade 4, Whites had higher average scores than Asians/Pacific Islanders. There were no differences detected in the scores of males and females at all three grades. Students in lower poverty schools generally outperformed students in higher poverty schools, as measured by the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, at all three grades. In addition, in grades 8 and 12, students whose parents had higher levels of education scored higher than their peers whose parents had less education (see table 14-2).


PDF  

Download/view file containing indicator and corresponding tables. (168 KB)

white bar
Charts  

U.S. HISTORY PERFORMANCE: Percentage distribution of students performing at each U.S. history achievement level, by grade: 1994 and 2001

white bar
Tables  

Table 14-1: Average U.S. history scale score by percentile and percentage of students at or above each U.S. history achievement level, by grade: 1994 and 2001

Table 14-2: Average U.S. history scale score of 4th-, 8th-, and 12th-graders, by selected student and school characteristics: 2001

white bar
Standard Error Tables  

Table S14: Standard errors for the percentage distribution of students performing at each U.S. history achievement level, by grade: 1994 and 2001

Table S14-1: Standard errors for the average U.S. history scale score by percentile and percentage of students at or above each U.S. history achievement level, by grade: 1994 and 2001

Table S14-2: Standard errors for the average U.S. history scale score of 4th-, 8th-, and 12th-graders, by selected student and school characteristics: 2001

white bar
Supplemental Notes  

Note 1: Commonly Used Variables

Note 4: National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

black bar


1990 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)