Home ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Updated 15 March 2006 | Temperature Trends in the Lower
Atmosphere:
|
|
![]() |
This 3rd draft of the CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.1 reflects consideration of all public comments received during a recent 45-day comment period (November 17, 2005 - January 4, 2006). Subsequent to the comment period, an open public meeting was held in Chicago, Illinois on February 8-9, 2006, to address the resolution of the comments. Following the Chicago meeting, this revised 3rd draft of CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.1 was completed in accordance with the rules of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. As of March 15, this 3rd draft is being posted here. In conformance with Guidelines for Producing CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Products, the final version of CCSP Synthesis and Assessment Product 1.1 will be released subsequent to consideration and approval by the CCSP Interagency Committee and the National Science and Technology Council. AbstractPreviously reported discrepancies between the amount of warming near the surface and higher in the atmosphere have been used to challenge the validity of climate models and the reality of human-induced global warming. Specifically, surface data showed substantial global-average warming, while early versions of satellite data showed little or no warming above the surface. There is no longer evidence of such a discrepancy. This is an important revision to and update of the conclusions of earlier reports from the U.S. National Research Council and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Since those reports, errors have been identified and corrected in the satellite
|
Third DraftNote: All links are to PDF files.
|
|
Front Matter [1.0 Mb]. Includes:
|
|
Preface [379 kb]. Report Motivation and Guidance for Using this Synthesis/Assessment Report |
Karl, T.R., C. D. Miller, and W. L. Murray, editors |
Executive Summary [1.1 Mb] |
Wigley, T.M.L., V. Ramaswamy, J.R. Christy, J.R. Lanzante, C.A. Mears, B.D. Santer, C.K. Folland |
Chapter 1 [1.2 Mb]. Why do temperatures vary vertically (from the surface to the stratosphere) and what do we understand about why they might vary and change over time? |
Ramaswamy, V., J.W. Hurrell, G.A. Meehl |
Chapter 2 [867 kb]. What kinds of atmospheric temperature variations can the current observing systems measure and what are their strengths and limitations, both spatially and temporally? |
Christy, J.R., D.J. Seidel, S.C. Sherwood |
Chapter 3 [1.8 Mb]. What do observations indicate about the changes of temperature in the atmosphere and at the surface since the advent of measuring temperatures vertically? |
Lanzante, J.R., T.C. Peterson, F.J. Wentz, K.Y. Vinnikov |
Chapter 4 [1.1 Mb]. What is our understanding of the contribution made by observational or methodological uncertainties to the previously reported vertical differences in temperature trends? |
Mears, C.A., C.E. Forest, R.W. Spencer, R.S. Vose, R.W. Reynolds |
Chapter 5 [1.9 Mb]. How well can the observed vertical temperature changes be reconciled with our understanding of the causes of these temperature changes? |
Santer, B.D., J.E. Penner, P.W. Thorne |
Chapter 6 [516 kb]. What measures can be taken to improve our understanding of observed changes? |
Folland, C.K., D. Parker, R.W. Reynolds, S.C. Sherwood, P.W. Thorne |
Appendix A [1.0 Mb]. Statistical Issues Regarding Trends. |
Wigley, T.M.L. |
Glossary & Acronyms; References; Photography Credits; Contact Information; Officials of the Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research; back cover [965 kb] | |
This document, the first of the Synthesis and Assessment Products described in the U.S. Climate Change Science Program (CCSP) Strategic Plan, was prepared in accordance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and the information quality act guidelines issued by the Department of Commerce and NOAA pursuant to Section 515. For purposes of compliance with Section 515, the Climate Change Science Program is an “interpreted product” as that term is used in NOAA guidelines, and this Synthesis and Assessment product is classified as “highly influential”. This document does not express any regulatory policies of the United States or any of its agencies, or provide recommendations for regulatory action. |
|