Sam Gleese
|
October 25, 2002 |
I appreciate the fact that the federal government is interested in making
traveling safe for blind and visually impaired persons. I have lived as a blind
person all of my life. For the first 33 years I was legally blind. During that
time in my life I functioned safely in traveling in small towns as well as large
cities without any incidents of endangering my life while crossing busy
intersections. At age 33 I became totally blind. I recieved training,
orientation, and mobility. This training gave me the skills to travel as a blind
person with the use of a white can. This treaing included traveling in my
neighborhood as well as downtown. I have had the opportunity to cross at
intersections that provided for vehicles to turn right on red. Even in those
cases I was able to cross safely. There are only a couple of intersections in my
city that would qualify as dangerous enough to qualify for some type of audible
traffic device. The federalfunds used to install these signals could be more
effectively used by investing in other institutions that would give blind and
visually impaired more skills and adaptive office equipment that would assist
them in becoming gainfully employed. This would put more funds in the national
treasury rather than take funds out. As for detectable warnings they could pose
more of a safety hazard than providing for safety in crossing streets. The
streets in my city and other cities that I have visited provide adequate
indicators approching the end of a sidewalk and entering the path of moving
vehicles. These detetable warnings would do more to hinder independent travel
than to enhance it. I strongly recommend more time for study and evaluation. In
the meantime, blind and visually impaired persons will continue to travel safely
on our streets as they have in the past.
Thanks,
Sam Gleese
NFB of Mississippi President
index
previous comment
next comment