Robert B. Williams, P.E., P.T.O.E.  
October 17, 2002


Standardization is a goal always worthy of consideration. However, in some situations, its disadvantages may outweigh its advantages. Such is the case when setting traffic signal pedestrian clearance intervals. Please reconsider the referenced report's "call" for calculating all pedestrian clearance intervals nation-wide on the basis of an assumed 3.0 ft./sec. walking speed.

In Miami-Dade County, we have thousands of pedestrian clearance intervals at thousands of traffic signals. All of their interval durations have been calculated based on the speed of typical pedestrians using each crossing on a case-by-case basis. Although we often use the "industry-standard" of 4.0 ft./sec., we equally often make whatever adjustments are warranted to best serve the public at that particular intersection.

In downtown business districts where daytime traffic congestion is severe and pedestrians are generally in a hurry, we increase the standard assumed crossing speed to 4.5 ft./sec. Near retirement and assisted living facilities, we decrease the standard assumed crossing speed to 2.5 ft./sec. In tourist zones and in school zones, assumed crossing speeds between those two extremes are used.

At locations where we use the 2.5 ft./sec. speed, changing to 3.0 ft./sec. would be unsafe for disabled people with walkers and in wheelchairs.

On the other hand, decreasing the assumed speed to 3.0 ft./sec. at locations where there is no regular demand for such would severely and unnecessarily reduce the capacity of over a thousand intersections in Miami-Dade County alone. Most of those intersections are already experiencing vehicular demand volumes in excess of their capacity during one or more hours of the day. Decreasing their capacity would immeasurably increase vehicular stops, delays, fuel consumption, other operating costs, pollutant emission, wasted man-hours, driver frustration, and rear-end collisions.

Therefore, for the benefit of all members of the public, disabled and fully abled alike, I strongly recommend and request that the proposed nationwide pedestrian crossing speed standard of 3.0 ft./sec. be eliminated from the referenced document.

Thank you for offering this forum for the public to comment on your proposals. In general, I find most of your report to be well thought out and well written and commend you for this work. I generally support your goal to encourage all jurisdictions to make reasonable efforts to accommodate all of our citizens.

Robert B. Williams, P.E., P.T.O.E.
Traffic Signal System & Operations Mgr.
Traffic Signals & Signs Division
Miami-Dade Public Works
 

left arrow index    left arrow previous comment   bullet   next comment right arrow