Charles Richardson 
September 19, 2002

Dear Access Board,

As a blind citizen I would like to make comment on the proposed Accessible Pedestrian Signals and Detectable Warnings that are currently under review.

For the most part traveling as a blind person is no more dangerous than a sighted person traveling. There have been no disproportionate numbers of traffic accidents involving blind people as oppose to the sighted counterparts. If there were the media would have made a big story out of it. This is not to make any less of those who have been killed in traffic inc1dences. These incidences have probably occurred for reasons that are beyond knowing that the traffic light is red or green.

Currently some cities, as Albany has done earlier this year, have installed Accessible Pedestrian Signals without a survey of the blind or sighted citizens. These signals do affect the lives of all that live in the city. Weather or not the signals have been proven to be helpful or increase a blind person’s travel safety hasn’t seemed to be proven here in Albany. As a matter of fact the opposite has happened on a couple of occasions. Two similar cases that were talked about by citizens who work downtown have talked about two different blind people who have, until these signals were installed, always used assistance in crossing the street where they work. Similarly, they have attempted to cross because the Accessible Pedestrian Signal indicated that it was time to cross and these individuals have started to cross and veer off the crossing into the street that currently had the green light. Luckily for these individuals that other people waiting at a bus stop witnessed this and assisted them to the bus stop and now feel that they bad better watch out for these blind people as their crossing the street have become more dangerous than before. This image does spread to all blind people in the view of the citizens that see this happen and it takes a long time for those images to go away.

Of course this is not the case with most blind people as most blind people have used safe methods of crossing streets for years and the only thing that has changed is that there is more noise to deal with while crossing streets with these APS devices. The real problem with a blind person being in danger of crossing a street is not having proper training in the methods of orientation and mobility. The APS devices are an expensive Band-Aid approach in curing a problem that is not as wide spread, as its proponents would make it out to be. The money spent on these devices would be better spent on training blind people in need of orientation and mobility training.

In the case of traffic situation where traffic patterns aren’t a standard “+“ crossing, such as a “T” intersection or a “V” merger, local traffic safety officials should hear from as many blind citizens as possible. There are some limited situations in which these can be helped. But there are also some situations where APS devices don’t increase the safely of an already dangerous intersection. There is one situation of this here in Albany where Washington Ave. ends into the intersection of Eagle and State streets. Many sighted people much less blind individuals do not traverse this intersection.

I would like to reiterate that these beeping APS have been attempted to be used as directional devices and have nearly caused incidences here in Albany. The cost far outweighs the usefulness in most situations. Audible Traffic Signals make too much noise, which interfere with a blind person listening to their surroundings while crossing and are generally unpleasant for all the public to have to listen to. Where blind citizens who have been consulted find that there is a need for APS, vibro-tactical APS are preferred.

Detectable warnings are also proposed and have the potential of being misused. Any wheelchair ramp that has a slope greater than 1 inch of rise for every 15 inches of run is easily detectable with or without a cane. These Detectable Warnings or Truncated Domes as they are also known as, have been known to be dangerous to all when wet or when covered with leaves or when walked across with shoes with small heels as many women wear. They will also have little to no use in the northeast in the winter when covered with snow.

I would like to thank you for giving us blind citizens a chance to make comment on issues that directly impact our lives. Some of the public have a lot of misconceptions about the abilities of blind people and if the environment needs to be drastically changed to accommodate blind people, then potential employers will feel that the same has to be done at the work place which could jeopardize further blind person’s chance of employment. Blind people haven’t achieved equality around the nation as of yet and as well intentioned as it may be APS devices and Detectable warnings can be a set back.

Sincerely,
Charles Richardson
 

left arrow index    left arrow previous comment   bullet   next comment right arrow