Contaminant Fate and Transport Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
Detection, Survival, Transport, and Reduction of Human Pathogens from Animal Manure
Methyl Bromide
Methyl Iodide
Telone (1,3-D)
Choropicrin
Emission Reduction
Film Permeability
Pictures
 

Research Project: MINIMIZING AIR AND WATER CONTAMINATION FROM AGRICULTURAL PESTICIDES

Location: Contaminant Fate and Transport

Title: BASE CATION AND SILICON BIOGEOCHEMISTRY UNDER PINE AND SCRUB OAK MONOCULTURES: IMPLICATIONS FOR WEATHERING RATES

Authors
item Johnson-Maynard, J - UNIV OF IDAHO, MOSCOW
item Graham, R - UC RIVERSIDE, CA
item Shouse, Peter
item Quideau, S - UNIV ALBERTA, CANADA

Submitted to: Geoderma
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed Journal
Publication Acceptance Date: October 22, 2004
Publication Date: November 23, 2004
Citation: Johnson-Maynard, J.L., Graham, R.C., Shouse, P.J., Quideau, S.A. 2004. Base cation and silicon biogeochemistry under pine and scrub oak monocultures: implications for weathering rates. Geoderma. 126: 353-365

Interpretive Summary: Understanding the relationship between vegetation type and soil forming processes such as mineral weathering is a difficult task considering the interactions between biotic and abiotic soil forming factors. Using a true biosequence, allowed us an opportunity to link biogeochemical processes to mineral weathering in soils. We measured all relevant inputs and outputs and found that for pine vegetation atmospheric deposition of chemicals is more important than for scrub oak. In scrub oak, canopy leaching was an important input of chemicals to the soil. Nutrient cycling was also faster in oak than pine. Silicon and base cation fluxes indicated that pine vegetation type caused higher weathering rates than scrub oak. Soil solution chemistry shows that canopy and nutrient cycling processes are different between pine and scrub oak and are impacting the cation loss rates at different rates causing different soils to form after only 5 decades.

Technical Abstract: Vegetation type has a profound influence over biogeochemical processes, including canopy leaching, stemflow, litterfall, and nutrient uptake. Understanding the relationship between plants and soil processes such as mineral weathering is a difficult task considering the interactions among biotic and abiotic soil forming factors. In this study, soils planted with pure stands of scrub oak (Quercus dumosa Nutt.) and Coulter pine (Pinus coulteri B. Don) were used to identify key biogeochemical processes in each soil-plant system. The experimental design, a true biosequence, allowed an opportunity to link biogeochemical processes to mineral weathering. Precipitation, throughfall, litter leachate, and soil solutions were collected following rain events from November of 1996 to April of 1998. Relatively high Na and Ca concentrations in pine throughfall suggest that atmospheric deposition is a more important process within the pine canopy than is canopy leaching. In contrast to pine throughfall, mean K concentrations were higher than Ca in oak throughfall, reflecting the importance of canopy leaching. Nutrient cycling was more rapid within the scrub oak soil/plant system as evidenced by significantly reduced levels of cations in soil solution at the 7.5-cm depth compared to litter leachate. Mean Si concentrations at the 65-cm depth were 334 micro-mol L-1 under oak and 431 micro-mol L-1 under pine. Silicon and base cation fluxes indicate higher weathering rates under pine. Solution chemistry shows that canopy and nutrient cycling processes are different between the two species and are impacting the cation loss rates.

   

 
Project Team
Yates, Scott
Skaggs, Todd
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Air Quality (203)
  Water Resource Management (201)
 
 
Last Modified: 11/10/2008
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House