US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census > ACS Main > How to Use the Data > Detailed Information on 2007 ACS Data Comparisons
 
Subject Area/Item* Comparing 2007 ACS with Census 2000 Comparing 2007 ACS with 2006 ACS
Age and Sex (01)
    Age Compare with Caution - The entire population continually ages into older age groups over time and babies fill in the youngest age group. So, the population of a certain age is made up of a completely different group of people in 2000 and 2007. Since populations occasionally experience booms/increases and busts/decreases in births, deaths, or migration (for example, the postwar Baby Boom from 1946-1964), one should not necessarily expect that the population in an age group in Census 2000 should be similar in size or proportion to the population in the same age group in the 2007 ACS. For example, Baby Boomers were age 36 to 54 in Census 2000 while they were age 43 to 61 in the 2007 ACS. So, the age group 55 to 59 would show a considerable increase in population when comparing Census 2000 data with the 2007 ACS data. Compare
    Sex Compare Compare
Race (02)
    Race Compare Compare
Hispanic Origin (03)
    Hispanic or Latino Origin Compare Compare
Ancestry (04)
    Ancestry Compare - Ancestry is the only item for which a "not reported" category is published since missing ancestries are never assigned or allocated. The extent of missing ancestry answers was higher in Census 2000 than in the 2007 ACS. The difference in the level of response may contribute to the difference in the two distributions. Compare
Foreign Born; Citizenship; Year of Entry; Nativity (05)
    Citizenship Status Compare Compare
    Nativity Compare Compare
    Year of Entry Compare - Census 2000 represents data collected as of April 1, 2000 and thus the "2000" year of entry category accounts for the first quarter (Jan-Mar) in 2000 only. The 2007 ACS represent data collected throughout the entire year and thus the "2000" year of entry category accounts for the entire year of 2000 Compare
Place of Birth (06)
    Place of Birth Compare Compare
Residence 1 year ago; Migration (07)
    Residence 1 year ago (Migration) Do Not Compare - The 2007 ACS asked for residence 1 year ago whereas Census 2000 asked for residence 5 years ago. Compare
Journey to Work; Workers; Commuting (08)
    Means of Transportation to Work Compare - The 2007 ACS excludes taxicabs in the tabulation category of "public transportation" and includes them in the category "taxicab, motocycle, bicycle or other means." However, Census 2000 includes taxicabs in the "public transportation" tabulation category. Compare
    Place of Work Compare Compare
    Private Vehicle Occupancy Compare Compare
    Time Leaving Home Compare Compare
    Travel Time to Work Compare Compare
Children; Household Relationship (09)
    Relationship to Householder Compare - The 2007 ACS used a joint relationship/marital status edit and Census 2000 did not. Also, Census 2000 provided more response categories than the 2007 ACS. Compare
Grandparent; Grandchildren (10)
    Grandparents as Caregivers Compare Compare
Household Type; Family Type; Subfamilies (11)
    Household/Family Type Compare Compare
    Subfamilies Compare with Caution - Census 2000 had more detailed relationship categories used to derive estimates of subfamilies than the 2007 ACS. Compare
Marital Status (12)
    Marital Status Compare - The 2007 ACS used a joint relationship/marital status edit and Census 2000 did not. Compare
Fertility (13)
    Fertility Do Not Compare - The question was not asked in Census 2000. Compare
School Enrollment (14)
    Type of School & School Enrollment Compare - The 2007 ACS reference period was 3 months preceding the date of interview, while the Census 2000 reference period was any time since February 1, 2000. Compare
Educational Attainment (15)
    Educational Attainment Compare Compare
Language Spoken at Home and Ability to Speak English (16)
    Ability to Speak English Compare Compare
    Language Spoken at Home Compare Compare
Poverty (17)
    Poverty Status of Families and People in Families Compare with Caution - The ACS collects data throughout the year on an on-going, monthly basis and asks for a respondent's income over the "past 12 months." Census 2000, however, collected the income data for a fixed period of time -- "during 1999" (the last calendar year). In a comparison study between Census 2000 income data and the 2000 ACS, income collected in Census 2000 was found to be about 4 percent higher than that in the 2000 ACS. For more information on the differences of income in the ACS and Census 2000, see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/ACS/ASA_nelson.pdf. Compare with Caution - As ACS data are collected every month of the year, adjacent years will have some reference months in common. Hence, comparing the 2007 ACS with the 2006 ACS estimates is not an exact comparison of the economic conditions in 2007 with those in 2006. For a discussion of this and related issues, see Hogan, Howard, "Measuring Population Change Using the American Community Survey," Applied Demography in the 21st Century, Steven H. Murdock and David A. Swanson eds., Springer Netherlands, 2008.
    Poverty Status of All People in the Poverty Universe Compare with Caution - The ACS collects data throughout the year on an on-going, monthly basis and asks for a respondent's income over the "past 12 months." Census 2000, however, collected the income data for a fixed period of time -- "during 1999" (the last calendar year). In a comparison study between Census 2000 income data and the 2000 ACS, income collected in Census 2000 was found to be about 4 percent higher than that in the 2000 ACS. For more information on the differences of income in the ACS and Census 2000, see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/ACS/ASA_nelson.pdf. Compare with Caution - As ACS data are collected every month of the year, adjacent years will have some reference months in common. Hence, comparing the 2007 ACS with the 2006 ACS estimates is not an exact comparison of the economic conditions in 2007 with those in 2006. For a discussion of this and related issues, see Hogan, Howard, "Measuring Population Change Using the American Community Survey," Applied Demography in the 21st Century, Steven H. Murdock and David A. Swanson eds., Springer Netherlands, 2008.
Disability (18)
    Disability Going Out / Working Do Not Compare - The 2007 ACS disability questions are different from the Census 2000 disability questions, thus comparisons cannot be made. Compare
    Disability Learning / Dressing Compare
    Disability Vision / Hearing / Physical Compare
Income (Households and Families) (19)
    Household and Family Incomes Compare with Caution - The ACS collects data throughout the year on an on-going, monthly basis and asks for a respondent's income over the "past 12 months." Census 2000, however, collected the income data for a fixed period of time -- "during 1999" (the last calendar year). In a comparison study between Census 2000 income data and the 2000 ACS, income collected in Census 2000 was found to be about 4 percent higher than that in the 2000 ACS. For more information on the differences of income in the ACS and Census 2000, see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/ACS/ASA_nelson.pdf. The Census Bureau recommends using CPI-U-RS adjustment factors published annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to adjust 1999 median, mean, and per capita income dollar amounts shown in Summary File 3 to 2007 dollars by multiplying the 1999 dollar amounts by the CPI-U-RS factor of 1.24438087. For CPI-U-RS inflation adjustment factors for other years see: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income05/cpiurs.html. Furthermore, direct comparisons of income and earnings distributions between Census 2000 and the 2007 ACS are not possible due to inflation. Users interested in making distribution comparisons need to inflation adjust individual income records using the Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) from Census 2000 Compare with Caution - As ACS data are collected every month of the year, adjacent years will have some reference months in common. Hence, comparing the 2007 ACS with the 2006 ACS estimates is not an exact comparison of the economic conditions in 2007 with those in 2006. For a discussion of this and related issues, see Hogan, Howard, "Measuring Population Change Using the American Community Survey," Applied Demography in the 21st Century, Steven H. Murdock and David A. Swanson eds., Springer Netherlands, 2008.
    Sources of Income (households) Compare with Caution - The ACS collects data throughout the year on an on-going, monthly basis and asks for a respondent's income over the "past 12 months." Census 2000, however, collected the income data for a fixed period of time -- "during 1999" (the last calendar year). In a comparison study between Census 2000 income data and the 2000 ACS, income collected in Census 2000 was found to be about 4 percent higher than that in the 2000 ACS. For more information on the differences of income in the ACS and Census 2000, see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/ACS/ASA_nelson.pdf. The Census Bureau recommends using CPI-U-RS adjustment factors published annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to adjust 1999 median, mean, and per capita income dollar amounts shown in Summary File 3 to 2007 dollars by multiplying the 1999 dollar amounts by the CPI-U-RS factor of 1.24438087. For CPI-U-RS inflation adjustment factors for other years see: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income05/cpiurs.html. Furthermore, direct comparisons of income and earnings distributions between Census 2000 and the 2007 ACS are not possible due to inflation. Users interested in making distribution comparisons need to inflation adjust individual income records using the Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) from Census 2000. Compare with Caution - As ACS data are collected every month of the year, adjacent years will have some reference months in common. Hence, comparing the 2007 ACS with the 2006 ACS estimates is not an exact comparison of the economic conditions in 2007 with those in 2006. For a discussion of this and related issues, see Hogan, Howard, "Measuring Population Change Using the American Community Survey," Applied Demography in the 21st Century, Steven H. Murdock and David A. Swanson eds., Springer Netherlands, 2008.
Earnings and Income (Individuals) (20)
    Per Capita Income, Earnings (people), and Income (people) Compare with Caution - The ACS collects data throughout the year on an on-going, monthly basis and asks for a respondent's income over the "past 12 months." Census 2000, however, collected the income data for a fixed period of time -- "during 1999" (the last calendar year). In a comparison study between Census 2000 income data and the 2000 ACS, income collected in Census 2000 was found to be about 4 percent higher than that in the 2000 ACS. For more information on the differences of income in the ACS and Census 2000, see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/ACS/ASA_nelson.pdf. The Census Bureau recommends using CPI-U-RS adjustment factors published annually by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) to adjust 1999 median, mean, and per capita income dollar amounts shown in Summary File 3 to 2007 dollars by multiplying the 1999 dollar amounts by the CPI-U-RS factor of 1.24438087. For CPI-U-RS inflation adjustment factors for other years see: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/income05/cpiurs.html. Furthermore, direct comparisons of income and earnings distributions between Census 2000 and the 2007 ACS are not possible due to inflation. Users interested in making distribution comparisons need to inflation adjust individual income records using the Public Use Microdata Samples (PUMS) from Census 2000. Compare with Caution - As ACS data are collected every month of the year, adjacent years will have some reference months in common. Hence, comparing the 2007 ACS with the 2006 ACS estimates is not an exact comparison of the economic conditions in 2007 with those in 2006. For a discussion of this and related issues, see Hogan, Howard, "Measuring Population Change Using the American Community Survey," Applied Demography in the 21st Century, Steven H. Murdock and David A. Swanson eds., Springer Netherlands, 2008.
Veteran Status (21)
    Period of Military Service Compare - Since Census 2000, the period of military service categories on the ACS questionnaire were updated to: 1) include the most recent period "September 2001 or later;" 2) list all "peace time" periods without showing a date-breakup in the list; and 3) update the Korean War and World War II dates to match the official dates as listed in US Code, Title 38. While the response categories differ slightly from those in Census 2000, data from the two questions can still be compared to one another. Compare with Caution - Due to an editing error, veteran's period of service (VPS) prior to 2007 was being incorrectly assigned for some individuals. The majority of the errors misclassified some people who reported only serving during the Vietnam Era as having served in the category "Gulf War and Vietnam Era." The remainder of the errors misclassified some people who reported only serving between the Vietnam Era and Gulf War as having served in the category "Gulf War."
    Veteran Status Compare - The 2007 ACS has two separate questions, whereas in Census 2000, it was a two part question. However, the actual questions remain the same. Compare
Food Stamps (22)
    Food Stamp Benefit Do Not Compare - The question was not asked in Census 2000 thus comparions cannot be made. Compare
Employment Status; Work Experience; Labor Force (23)
    Employment Status Compare with Caution - The reference periods are different due to year-round ACS data collection. The ACS reference period is the week prior to the respondent completing the interview, or the field representative conducting the interview. Because questionnaires are mailed-out and field interviews are conducted throughout the year, there is a revolving reference period. For Census 2000, the reference period was the week prior to Census Day (April 1, 2000). The Census 2000 Summary File 3 (SF3) labor force data for some places where colleges are located appear to overstate the estimates of people in the labor force, the unemployed, and the percent unemployed because of data capture errors. Compare
    Hours Worked Compare - The 2007 ACS reference period is 12 months preceding the date of interview, while the Census 2000 reference period was the 1999 calendar year. Compare
    Weeks Worked Compare - The 2007 ACS reference period is 12 months preceding the date of interview, while the Census 2000 reference period was the 1999 calendar year. Compare
Industry & Occupation; Class of Worker (24)
    Class of Worker Compare with Caution - The Census 2000 tables use different tabulation categories than the 2007 ACS. However, PUMS data for Census 2000 and the 2007 ACS may be compared. When available, compare like universes. Compare
    Industry and Occupation Compare with Caution - The 2007 ACS codes are based on the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) and are 4-digit codes, whereas Census 2000 codes are based on the 1997 NAICS and were 3-digit codes. Codes and descriptions, particularly within the Electronic Shopping, Internet Services, and Wholesale categories changed. Also, the Census 2000 tables did not include the "full-time, year-round" population and there were no median earnings Industry and Occupation tables. Thus, comparisons cannot be made for this population or characteristic. Compare
Housing (25)
    Bedrooms Compare Compare
    Contract and Gross Rent Do Not Compare - For Census 2000, tables were not released for total renter-occupied units. The universe in the 2007 ACS is "all housing units" wheras in Census 2000 the universe was "specified renter-occupied housing units," thus comparisons cannot be made. Compare
    Cost of Utilities Compare Compare
    Gross Rent as a Percentage of Household Income Do Not Compare - For Census 2000, tables were not released for total renter-occupied units. The universe in the 2007 ACS is "all housing units" wheras in Census 2000, the universe was "specified owner-occupied housing units," thus comparisons cannot be made. Compare
    House Heating Fuel Compare Compare
    Kitchen Facilities Compare Compare
    Monthly Rent Compare Compare
    Mortgage Status Compare - With a mortgage/without a mortgage released in Census 2000 for both total owner-occupied units and specifed owner-occupied units. Compare
    Occupants per Room Compare Compare
    Owner Costs as a Percentage of Household Income Compare with Caution - For Census 2000, tables with full distribution were released for total owner-occupied units but medians were not shown. When available, compare like universes. Compare
    Plumbing Facilities Compare Compare
    Real Estate Taxes Do Not Compare - The universe in the 2007 ACS is "all housing units" wheras in Census 2000, the universe was "specified owner-occupied housing units," thus comparisons cannot be made. Compare
    Rooms Compare Compare
    Selected Monthly Owner Costs Compare with Caution - For Census 2000, tables with full distribution were released for total owner-occupied units but medians were not shown. When available, compare like universes. Compare
    Telephone Service Compare Compare
    Tenure Compare Compare
    Units in Structure Compare Compare
    Vacancy Status Compare with Caution - The tabulation category "Rented or sold, not occupied" in Census 2000 is separated into two categories "Rented, not occupied" and "Sold, not occupied" in the 2007 ACS. Compare
    Value of Property Compare with Caution - The 2007 ACS has allows a write-in for values over $250,000. For Census 2000, tables with full distribution, medians, and aggregate values were released for specified owner-occupied units as well as total owner-occupied units. When available, compare like universes. Compare
    Vehicles Available Compare Compare
    Year Moved In Compare Compare
    Year Structure Built Compare Compare
Group Quarters (26)
    Group Quarters Population Compare with Caution - The total group quarters (GQ) population in the 2007 ACS may not be comparable with Census 2000 because: 1) There are some Census 2000 GQ types that were out of scope in the 2007 ACS such as domestic violence shelters, soup kitchens, regularly scheduled mobile food vans, targeted non-sheltered outdoor locations, crews of maritime vessels and living quarters for victims of natural disasters. Also, there are some Census 2000 GQ type categories that are no longer valid (residential care facility providing "Protective Oversight," hospitals/wards for the chronically ill and hospitals/wards for drug/alcohol abuse). The exclusion of these GQ types from the 2007 ACS may result in a small bias in some ACS estimates to the extent that the excluded population is different from the included population. 2) A sample of GQ facilities throughout the United States and Puerto Rico were selected for the 2007 ACS. ACS controls the GQ sample at the state level only. Therefore, for lower levels of geography, particularly when there are relatively few GQs in a geographic area, the ACS estimate of the GQ population may vary from the estimate from Census 2000. Compare with caution at Nation and State level (do not compare below State level) - The weighting for the group quarters (GQ) population is controlled at the state level, but not at sub-state levels. For this reason, users may observe greater fluctuations in year-to-year ACS estimates of the GQ population at sub-state levels than at state levels. The causes of these fluctuations typically are the result of either GQs that have closed or where the current population of the GQ is significantly different than the expected population as reflected on the sampling frame. Substantial changes in the ACS GQ estimates can impact ACS estimates of total population characteristics for areas where either the GQ population is a substantial proportion of the total population or where the GQ population may have very different characteristics than the total population as a whole. Users can assess the impact that year-to-year changes in sub-state GQ total population estimates have on the changes in total ACS population estimates by accessing Table B26001 on American Fact Finder. Users should also use their local knowledge to help determine whether the year-to-year change in the ACS estimate represents a real change in the GQ population or may be the result of the lack of adequate population controls for sub-state areas.

* Each subject area is listed with its 2-digit code identifier. This code corresponds to the second and third characters of the ACS table number. For example, Table B08303 - Travel Time to Work has the second and third digits of "08" which corresponds to the subject Journey to Work; Workers; and Commuting.
Back to top

 

[PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe. This symbol Symbol indicating that file is external to this site. indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.

 
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 19, 2008