Initiative:
E-GOVERNMENT
DOC Lead:
Suzanne Hilding
Lead RMO Examiner:
John Quinlan
Lead IT/E-Gov Analyst:
Wendy Liberante
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081105154100im_/http://ocio.os.doc.gov/s/groups/public/@doc/@os/@ocio/@oitpp/documents/content/%7Eexport/PROD01_002097%7E8%7EDOC_DCT_GENERIC%7EDEV01_000363/14184-1.jpg)
Color
Next ↑
est. by
(date)
|
Enterprise Architecture
_ Has 4 in Completion and 4 in Use or Results (Y) date
Has 4 in Completion, Use & Results (G) date
Acceptable business cases for major systems
for more than 50% (Y) date
for all (G) date
Cost/schedule/performance adherence for major IT
overruns/shortfalls < 30% (Y) date
EVMS shows overruns/ shortfalls <10% (G) date
Security of all IT systems
_ 80% secured or IG verifies effectiveness (Y) date
90% secured (G) date
IG or Agency head verifies effective & rates certification as Satisfactory (G) date
E-Gov implementation
has current plan in place (Y) date
adheres to agency-accepted and OMB approved implementation plan (G) date
MAINTAINING GREEN
all IT systems secure date
IT systems installed in accordance with security configurations date
Privacy Impact Statements for 90% of applicable systems date
90% of systems w/personally ID info have system of records date
__ Has an agreed-upon plan to meet necessary communication for COOP and COG date
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081105154100im_/http://ocio.os.doc.gov/s/groups/public/@doc/@os/@ocio/@oitpp/documents/content/%7Eexport/PROD01_002097%7E8%7EDOC_DCT_GENERIC%7EDEV01_000363/14184-1.jpg)
Color
|
Actions taken this quarter:
• Provide a brief summary of key actions.
Planned actions for next quarter:
• Outline key actions.
|
• Discuss critical actions planned (as appropriate).
• Explain a change in the rating for Status or Progress.
• Use additional bullets to explain or enhance discussion in first two columns (e.g., legislative barriers or other risks to PMA implementation, management changes at agency, etc.).
|