Bernie R. Vinther
|
October 28, 2002 |
About 20 years ago I was a licensed driver. Now, I am totally blind and a
person who has experianced being hit trying to cross streets with standard but
not accessible signals. I was seriously injured, going over the hood of a
vehicle traveling at 25 mph. Fortunately, my dog guide received less serious
injuries, and we still travel independently about town.
However, even before the accident, I felt the need for accessable pedestrian
signals, and I am (fortunately living) proof of that need. I also feel STRONGLY
that the Access Board should accept/adopt the proposed regulations from the
Public rights of Way Advisory committee involving the use of detectable warnings
and accessible pedestrian signals. I have personally experienced the benefits of
these devices. They cause no harm or disadvantage to those who don't need or
choose not to use them. But, They are reasonable and absolutely necessary by all
persons in my situation who desire to cross streets safely at controled
intersections.
Sincerely,
Bernie R. Vinther
index
previous comment
next comment