table with row headers in column A and column headers in rows 4 through 6 and rows 47 through 49,,,,, "Table 1.16c Upper Bound of the Estimates - Population by State and U.S. Citizenship Status, With Percentages by State: 2003 ",,,,, STATE,,U.S. Citizenship Status,,, ,,,Foreign Born,, ,Total,Native,Total,Naturalized U.S. Citizen,Not a U.S. Citizen United States, *****,"249,593,939","33,751,944","14,031,561","19,840,384" .Alabama, *****,"4,291,024","115,759","39,535","83,755" .Alaska, *****,"594,436","41,112","22,515","20,402" .Arizona, *****,"4,759,432","803,132","250,152","563,866" .Arkansas, *****,"2,574,275","90,974","26,693","67,654" .California, *****,"25,574,244","9,297,994","3,893,968","5,458,836" .Colorado, *****,"4,037,680","456,109","157,009","310,281" .Connecticut, *****,"3,008,161","406,112","182,050","232,677" .Delaware, *****,"747,766","52,375","23,277","30,708" .District of Columbia, *****,"453,617","82,638","26,551","58,545" .Florida, *****,"13,760,956","2,998,341","1,380,660","1,640,355" .Georgia, *****,"7,791,961","688,325","220,410","480,996" .Hawaii, *****,"1,032,196","226,681","132,724","98,562" .Idaho, *****,"1,263,327","87,642","30,167","61,899" .Illinois, *****,"10,742,023","1,681,904","731,208","976,334" .Indiana, *****,"5,815,128","239,443","79,948","169,523" .Iowa, *****,"2,755,990","104,682","33,538","73,790" .Kansas, *****,"2,508,420","155,053","60,357","102,129" .Kentucky, *****,"3,920,805","102,390","32,754","73,704" .Louisiana, *****,"4,244,086","143,715","67,404","81,569" .Maine, *****,"1,238,068","43,839","25,560","20,010" .Maryland, *****,"4,822,732","592,161","271,149","335,998" .Massachusetts, *****,"5,399,235","879,960","420,068","475,303" .Michigan, *****,"9,274,535","613,365","260,124","367,659" .Minnesota, *****,"4,636,814","315,614","135,901","192,875" .Missouri, *****,"2,747,221","50,002","17,466","35,777" .Mississippi, *****,"5,363,930","205,274","86,931","127,264" .Montana, *****,"878,986","18,871","10,846","8,859" .Nebraska, *****,"1,612,832","86,143","31,185","58,729" .Nevada, *****,"1,847,735","399,929","141,940","271,556" .New Hampshire, *****,"1,193,471","68,195","31,237","40,229" .New Jersey, *****,"6,861,626","1,660,342","781,525","903,873" .New Mexico, *****,"1,684,211","213,848","58,506","159,735" .New York, *****,"14,790,726","3,937,571","2,019,206","1,957,137" .North Carolina, *****,"7,666,582","525,628","130,609","405,595" (Continued),,,,, ,,,,, "Table 1.16c Upper Bound of the Estimates - Population by State and U.S. Citizenship Status, With Percentages by State: 2003 ",,,,, STATE,,U.S. Citizenship Status,,, ,,,Foreign Born,, ,Total,Native,Total,Naturalized U.S. Citizen,Not a U.S. Citizen .North Dakota, *****,"595,485","19,199","10,090","10,015" .Ohio, *****,"10,774,750","393,305","194,854","207,232" .Oklahoma, *****,"3,256,880","165,740","57,952","112,658" .Oregon, *****,"3,200,121","320,384","119,483","206,921" .Pennsylvania, *****,"11,394,353","578,733","297,575","293,043" .Rhode Island, *****,"923,872","126,291","61,897","68,789" .South Carolina, *****,"3,885,880","147,011","55,375","96,769" .South Dakota, *****,"724,387","14,228","6,891","8,211" .Tennessee, *****,"5,522,868","190,590","64,970","134,083" .Texas, *****,"18,284,160","3,451,383","1,093,743","2,384,655" .Utah, *****,"2,156,184","181,419","59,323","129,283" .Vermont, *****,"580,339","23,778","13,012","11,590" .Virginia, *****,"6,518,406","680,326","279,847","413,050" .Washington, *****,"5,401,725","640,565","289,224","362,665" .West Virginia, *****,"1,744,733","30,407","15,775","16,832" .Wisconsin, *****,"5,105,813","239,748","93,640","152,794" .Wyoming, *****,"479,752","13,698","4,740","9,908" An '******' entry in the lower and upper bound columns indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test is not appropriate.,,,,, "NOTE: The 2003 American Community Survey universe is limited to the household population and excludes the population living in institutions, college dormitories, ",,,,, and other group quarters. Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability (see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/UseData/Accuracy/Accuracy1.htm). ,,,,, The degree of uncertainty for an estimate is represented through the use of a confidence interval. The confidence interval computed here is a 90-percent confidence interval ,,,,, and can be interpreted roughly as providing 90-percent certainty that the true number falls between the lower and upper bounds.,,,,, "SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2003",,,,, " Immigration Statistics Staff, Population Division",,,,, Internet Release date: ,,,,,