table with row headers in column A and column headers in rows 4 through 6 and rows 47 through 49,,,,, "Table 1.16b Lower Bound of the Estimates - Population by State and U.S. Citizenship Status, With Percentages by State: 2003 ",,,,, STATE,,U.S. Citizenship Status,,, ,,,Foreign Born,, ,Total,Native,Total,Naturalized U.S. Citizen,Not a U.S. Citizen United States, *****,"249,157,941","33,315,946","13,755,309","19,440,636" .Alabama, *****,"4,269,686","94,421","28,645","58,245" .Alaska, *****,"588,724","35,398","18,815","14,768" .Arizona, *****,"4,667,708","711,408","202,578","497,944" .Arkansas, *****,"2,559,085","75,786","19,087","53,326" .California, *****,"25,352,696","9,076,446","3,754,232","5,267,414" .Colorado, *****,"3,991,780","410,211","128,321","270,709" .Connecticut, *****,"2,965,129","363,078","155,440","199,023" .Delaware, *****,"740,114","44,725","18,043","25,072" .District of Columbia, *****,"446,123","75,142","21,299","51,385" .Florida, *****,"13,619,804","2,857,189","1,302,240","1,532,275" .Georgia, *****,"7,749,879","646,245","189,470","443,694" .Hawaii, *****,"995,204","189,689","104,886","80,208" .Idaho, *****,"1,245,523","69,838","20,243","45,171" .Illinois, *****,"10,646,817","1,586,696","669,812","891,246" .Indiana, *****,"5,778,002","202,317","61,472","130,817" .Iowa, *****,"2,735,190","83,878","25,272","55,960" .Kansas, *****,"2,486,690","133,327","46,213","79,681" .Kentucky, *****,"3,900,645","82,230","21,416","56,746" .Louisiana, *****,"4,217,554","117,185","54,656","57,271" .Maine, *****,"1,226,762","32,531","18,520","12,280" .Maryland, *****,"4,780,308","549,739","239,521","295,232" .Massachusetts, *****,"5,338,815","819,540","379,872","424,257" .Michigan, *****,"9,212,475","551,305","227,116","309,771" .Minnesota, *****,"4,603,966","282,766","112,229","157,385" .Mississippi, *****,"2,735,489","38,268","11,314","23,713" .Missouri, *****,"5,329,480","170,826","68,349","93,556" .Montana, *****,"873,624","13,509","7,274","5,401" .Nebraska, *****,"1,601,518","74,827","23,225","47,831" .Nevada, *****,"1,807,645","359,841","116,720","229,554" .New Hampshire, *****,"1,183,379","58,105","23,803","31,021" .New Jersey, *****,"6,783,734","1,582,448","724,855","832,547" .New Mexico, *****,"1,624,429","154,062","40,244","109,425" .New York, *****,"14,662,954","3,809,799","1,924,884","1,846,153" .North Carolina, *****,"7,620,878","479,922","106,191","363,155" (Continued),,,,, ,,,,, "Table 1.16b Lower Bound of the Estimates - Population by State and U.S. Citizenship Status, With Percentages by State: 2003 ",,,,, STATE,,U.S. Citizenship Status,,, ,,,Foreign Born,, ,Total,Native,Total,Naturalized U.S. Citizen,Not a U.S. Citizen .North Dakota, *****,"590,035","13,751","6,210","6,635" .Ohio, *****,"10,741,420","359,975","168,956","182,228" .Oklahoma, *****,"3,231,050","139,910","47,468","87,572" .Oregon, *****,"3,161,949","282,216","101,877","174,319" .Pennsylvania, *****,"11,343,287","527,667","263,655","252,127" .Rhode Island, *****,"910,908","113,329","51,803","57,131" .South Carolina, *****,"3,861,540","122,669","42,875","74,661" .South Dakota, *****,"721,123","10,962","4,329","5,759" .Tennessee, *****,"5,498,672","166,390","48,340","109,587" .Texas, *****,"18,096,440","3,263,667","998,117","2,238,525" .Utah, *****,"2,128,136","153,371","45,857","100,337" .Vermont, *****,"574,571","18,012","9,708","7,480" .Virginia, *****,"6,471,634","633,554","250,983","370,000" .Washington, *****,"5,349,455","588,295","258,776","318,195" .West Virginia, *****,"1,735,787","21,463","10,295","8,978" .Wisconsin, *****,"5,076,467","210,402","76,780","126,936" .Wyoming, *****,"473,648","7,592","3,000","3,632" An '******' entry in the lower and upper bound columns indicates that the estimate is controlled. A statistical test is not appropriate.,,,,, "NOTE: The 2003 American Community Survey universe is limited to the household population and excludes the population living in institutions, college dormitories, ",,,,, and other group quarters. Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability (see http://www.census.gov/acs/www/UseData/Accuracy/Accuracy1.htm). ,,,,, The degree of uncertainty for an estimate is represented through the use of a confidence interval. The confidence interval computed here is a 90-percent confidence interval ,,,,, and can be interpreted roughly as providing 90-percent certainty that the true number falls between the lower and upper bounds.,,,,, "SOURCE: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 2003",,,,, " Immigration Statistics Staff, Population Division",,,,, Internet Release date: ,,,,,