skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov/ebsa
November 5, 2008    DOL > EBSA > Newsroom > Speeches and Testimony   

Speeches and Testimony

Remarks of Assistant Secretary Ann L. Combs Before the American Bankers Association Retirement Services Conference

June 19, 2003

Introductory Remarks

Thank you, Rob (Muse w/SEI Investments, Chair of the Conference Committee), for that kind introduction. It is a pleasure to be here at a time when the retirement services industry is experiencing some of most sweeping changes in years.

First, let me commend the ABA for the fine job you do representing your member banks and enhancing their role as providers of financial services.

Let me also thank Lisa and Jim, for your hard, effective work on Capitol Hill and within the Administration. I assure you — your voice is heard.

I want to touch on a number of topics with you today – to bring you up to date on a number of things we’ve accomplished and talk to you about what we’re looking to do in the future. And, I hope you’ll walk away with a better sense of the philosophy that drives our decision-making.

 Back To Top

EBSA’s Name Change

Before I begin, I want to take care of a little housekeeping item. As you likely know, Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao changed our agency’s name in February to the Employee Benefits Security Administration - or EBSA - to make the agency’s mission more recognizable to those we serve. Last year, EBSA assisted a record 184,000 American workers, retirees and their families, and achieved record monetary recoveries through enforcement actions focusing on both retirement and health plans. Let me reaffirm that the name may have changed but our mission remains the same and our commitment is stronger than ever.

 Back To Top

Legislative Update

Let me start with a brief overview of our legislative agenda. There can be no doubt that this President is committed to expanding Americans’ opportunities to save. As you well know, in June of 2001 President Bush signed a tax bill that is now providing roughly $50 billion in tax relief over 10 years to enhance Americans’ retirement security. The increase in the 401(k) and IRA limits and the introduction of catch up contributions enhance workers ability to save for retirement. The vesting and portability features make it more likely those savings will be there when they are needed.

That tax package was followed up by the economic growth package signed last month that cuts marginal rates – letting workers keep a larger portion of their pay checks – and reduces the tax on capital gains and dividends – creating an important incentive for savings that will directly benefit millions of American workers and retirees – and fueling economic growth.

But more needs to be done. The increases in limits on contributions to retirement savings vehicles need to be made permanent. We need to have a dialogue about how to encourage those who do not save, or are not saving enough for retirement. We also need to address the barriers small businesses face in offering plans by embarking on dramatic simplification of the rules governing employer-provided plans.

One way to simplify what has undeniably become a Rube Goldberg set of rules that no one can fully understand or comply with is the bold new idea put forth in the President’s FY 2004 Budget proposal. To paraphrase Mark Twain, reports of the death of the President’s new Savings Accounts proposal are greatly exaggerated! The Administration continues to promote this new and innovative approach to encourage savings and I hope you’ll engage in the discussion with us.

Why should companies and their employees, let alone individual savers and retirees, have to sort through a myriad of different vehicles – and, in many cases hire a professional to help them choose – in order to meet their savings objectives? The President has proposed vastly simplifying the landscape by creating just two buckets for personal savings – savings you need to meet goals you have throughout your life such as educating your children, buying a home, meeting major medical expenses, or savings for retirement. Another long-term ideal is to move to a system that creates incentives for investment by eliminating taxes on savings.

Lifetime Savings Accounts (LSAs) and Retirement Savings Accounts (RSAs) will allow everyone to contribute after-tax dollars – with no limitations based on age or income status. Individuals will be able to convert existing accounts into these new accounts in order to consolidate and simplify their savings. Distributions from LSAs and RSAs would be tax-free.

The third leg of the President’s proposal would create Employer Retirement Savings Accounts (ERSAs) to vastly simplify employer-sponsored retirement plans by consolidating 401(k), SIMPLE 401(k), 403(b), and 457 defined contribution accounts into a single type of plan that can be easily established by any employer.

The simplified ERSA addresses the number one concern we hear from small business about 401(k)s and other retirement savings plans – they are too complicated!

We’ve heard the concerns expressed by some companies and by consultants who fear that the President’s proposal would undermine the employment-based system because small employers will have less of an incentive to offer plans if they can save enough on their own through LSAs and RSAs. They also are concerned that the existence of these attractive alternatives for individuals will make it more difficult for employers to pass the nondiscrimination tests.

I believe ERSAs would be a very attractive savings vehicle for employers and employees alike. ERSAs would be the only vehicle that could accept pre-tax contributions – making them a more attractive alternative than LSAs or RSAs. And employers still need to offer competitive benefit packages in order to be able to attract the best workers in a competitive job market.

I understand these concerns and want to work closely with the community to minimize any negative effects but we cannot continue to leave 50% of the workforce without an employer-sponsored plan and without adequate tax-favored alternatives that will allow them to accumulate sufficient assets for retirement.

In addition to these broad-based savings proposals, the Administration is strongly committed to passing legislation to strengthen the retirement security of America’s workers. As you know, over two years ago in the wake of the scandals at Enron, the President proposed a plan to enhance workers’ choices and control over their retirement accounts and restore confidence in the system.

Congress made a down payment on improving retirement security by passing a portion of the President’s Retirement Security Plan in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. That legislation contained two key provisions from the President’s plan.

Workers now receive notice 30 days prior to a retirement plan blackout period enabling them to plan accordingly and make necessary decisions about asset allocations, distributions or loan applications. Corporate officers are now prohibited from selling their own company stock during blackout periods. I’m proud to report that both the DOL and the SEC issued final regulations implementing these provisions before they went into effect in January.

Despite the inclusion of the blackout-related provisions in Sarbanes-Oxley, we still have important unfinished business. The remaining pieces of the President’s Plan are embodied in H.R. 1000. It would ensure that workers could sell company stock contributed on their behalf and diversify into other investment options after they have been in the plan for three years. We need to make sure that all workers are able to choose how to invest their accounts.

A meaningful ability to diversify also depends on workers receiving timely information about their 401(k) accounts. The President’s Plan would require companies to provide workers with quarterly benefit statements including information about the value of their assets, their rights to diversify, and the importance of maintaining a diversified portfolio.

Finally, the President’s Retirement Security Plan would increase workers’ access to professional investment advice by creating a statutory exemption from ERISA’s prohibited transaction rules to allow banks, insurers, registered brokers, and investment managers to provide individualized investment advice to workers in plans with which they have a relationship.

You are well aware that individual Americans have primary responsibility for investing approximately $2 trillion in retirement savings through their defined contribution plans. They need help. By relying on expert advisers who assume full fiduciary responsibility for their counsel and disclose relationships and fees associated with investment alternatives, American workers will be able to make better retirement decisions.

Let me be clear. Independent advisors offer a valuable service. They will continue to play an important role in this market. But it is clear that they are not able to fulfill the need on their own. Financial institutions are often in the best position to offer essential advice services.

You understand the powerful protections in the bill against self-dealing. No bank trust department can afford to run afoul of ERISA’s fiduciary rules and be barred from serving as a fiduciary to any plan. Full disclosure, regulatory oversight, and the fear of violating ERISA will create a powerful incentive for you to police yourselves. And, rest assured, the Department of Labor will be watching you as well.

On May 14, the House passed the President’s proposal (H.R. 1000) by a vote of 271 to 157 – with significant bipartisan support. We are hopeful that the Senate will move a bill this summer or fall so the President can sign into law these important protections. I would like to thank you and the ABA for your support for this important legislation.

Another important reason to pass the President’s retirement security package is so we can turn our collective attention to the problems facing defined benefit plans. You all know about the perfect storm of falling asset values and low interest rates – you’re living it. I won’t spend a lot of time discussing the alternatives here today. We can do that in Q & A if you’re interested. Let me just say that we are well aware of the need to find a replacement for the current discount rate – and to settle on it soon.

We are also concerned that there are more fundamental shortcomings in the current funding rules that lead to situations where vastly underfunded plans are terminated and their liabilities transferred to the PBGC. This not only puts pressure on the insurance system and other premium payers, it can result in reduced benefits for retirees and undermines faith in the defined benefit system. We are also keenly aware of the need to strike a balance that encourages companies to stay in the system and fund their plans responsibly over time.

Secretary of Labor Chao serves as Chair of the PBGC Board and is keenly aware of, and very interested in, these issues. We are part of an Administration working group that is evaluating options that will promote accuracy in the measurement of assets and liabilities, better transparency, and result in well-funded plans that keep their promises to workers.

 Back To Top

Regulatory Agenda

Let me briefly touch on our regulatory agenda. We are currently reviewing the comments submitted on our Request for Information on the automatic rollover provisions of EGTRRA. We wanted to start with an RFI before going to a proposal so that we could have the benefit of your insight and experience. The ABA’s comments were very thoughtful and I appreciate your participation. We will continue to work with you as the project moves forward.

 Back To Top

Overdraft Protection

As you know, EBSA also released an advisory opinion this past February that provides employee benefit plans the flexibility to use overdraft protection in processing securities transactions. The opinion was in response to an inquiry from the ABA and we certainly appreciate your cooperation in developing the guidance. I am pleased our joint efforts resulted in this common-sense advisory opinion.

 Back To Top

Prohibited Transaction Exemptions

We also are working on a number of class exemptions that should be of interest. We are in the process of updating the QPAM exemption to reflect the changes that have taken place in the industry since it was issued – primarily consolidation. We also hope to streamline based on our experience with the current exemption. It will be issued in proposed form and I look forward to your comments.

We also have class exemption projects underway for ECNs and foreign securities lending. We’ve done individual exemptions in each of these areas but I think, when it makes sense, we should give class relief so people can take advantage of the relief without incurring the time and expense associated with obtaining an individual exemption.

 Back To Top

Compliance Assistance

Let me move to another priority of Secretary Chao’s: compliance assistance. Since she arrived at the Department, she has stressed the need for EBSA to educate and assist employers, plan officials, trustees, service providers and others in achieving and maintaining compliance with ERISA.

 Back To Top

Voluntary Fiduciary Correction and Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance Programs

The Department took two significant regulatory steps last year to improve compliance assistance with ERISA by expanding the Voluntary Fiduciary Correction Program (VFCP) and the Delinquent Filer Voluntary Compliance (DFVC) Program. Both of these regulatory actions were finalized at the end of March 2002.

Through the VFCP, the Department will provide plan sponsors and service providers with the ability to self-correct certain transactions with the promise that the Department will not impose civil penalties. And, importantly, the IRS has agreed to refrain from imposing excise taxes associated with prohibited transactions that are corrected. Since the program was expanded we have processed nearly 200 applications and recovered over $4.6 million for plans.

We also updated and improved the DFVC Program. Plan sponsors who voluntarily come forward to bring their annual report filings up to date now face reduced penalties. The program also allows us to focus our enforcement resources on bad actors, and helps us bring more plans and participants onto our radar screen. Both the IRS and PBGC are participating in the program, which has received over 10,000 filings since it was revised.

These programs are works in progress. Please let us know how we can make them even more effective.

 Back To Top

Field Assistance Bulletins

Last year, EBSA released a new compliance assistance tool – Field Assistance Bulletins (FABs). FABs are a vehicle for the national office to provide guidance to EBSA field offices on legal issues that arise in the course of investigations. By issuing a formal bulletin, we ensure that the law is applied consistently across the various regions and inform the public of our views of the issue. They are all on our web site.

We have issued six FABS so far, including guidance on ESOP refinancing, the treatment of float, clarifying that restricting participant loans to executives to avoid any possible problems under Sarbanes-Oxley does not violate ERISA, and, most recently fee and expense allocation – an issue I know is of considerable interest to the ABA.

The guidance states that plan sponsors and fiduciaries have considerable discretion under ERISA to determine as a matter of plan design or administration how expenses will be allocated among participants and beneficiaries. The FAB concludes that fiduciaries generally will be required to follow a method of allocating expenses set forth in a plan document.

When plan documents are silent or ambiguous, plan fiduciaries must act prudently and solely in the interests of participants in determining how to allocate expenses. These general principles apply to methods of allocating expenses among participants in the plan as a whole and allocating specific expenses to individual participants, rather than the plan as a whole.

I understand Lou Campagna will be with you tomorrow morning and he will discuss the FABs, and our regulatory agenda in much more detail.

 Back To Top

Fiduciary Education and Training

Let me turn to the next major compliance assistance project we are undertaking – a fiduciary training program for union and management trustees.

Even with many recent, high profile cases facing fiduciaries, we all know that some employers have not implemented a systematic process to educate fiduciaries about their responsibilities under ERISA.

We began to look at this issue in 2002 and asked the ERISA Advisory Council to study what’s available now, what’s needed, and how we might go about improving it. The Council recommended that EBSA take many steps to educate businesses – with a special emphasis on small businesses – regarding their fiduciary duties in connection with the retirement plans they sponsor. In response to these recommendations, EBSA is working to develop a Fiduciary Education Program.

Specifically, during the next 12 months, EBSA will create new fiduciary education materials targeted to small business. EBSA will work with private partners to create fiduciary training opportunities in person around the country and through Internet web casts and telewebs. I hope we can partner with the ABA in these efforts where appropriate.

Finally, we are reviewing the recommendations of another Advisory Council report on orphan plans and hope to have an integrated package – working with the IRS – to address the issues that arise when plans are abandoned and service providers are faced with no fiduciary to close out the plan.

In sum, all of these compliance assistance initiatives are part of the Department’s ongoing outreach program to help employers, plan officials, and service providers comply with the ERISA.

 Back To Top

Enforcement

Let me close by reminding you that although we emphasize compliance assistance, we also understand that a strong enforcement program is necessary to protect workers from abusive practices and to ensure that all plan sponsors pay attention to their obligations.

In 2002, the Department opened nearly 5,000 investigations. The cases involving retirement plans alone resulted in monetary corrections of $691 million, an increase of 19% from 2001. 401(k) plan investigations specifically resulted in corrections of $174 million, up 52% from 2001. Our enforcement results for this year are on track to set another record. While I am proud of these results, I would prefer to see better compliance up front. It is always better for participants to receive the benefits they are entitled to without having to resort to investigations and recoveries.

While 401(k) plans generally – and delinquent contributions in particular – continue to represent the largest number of investigations we conduct, the past two years have seen a new type of case that is occupying a lot of our attention – corporate fraud. While we don’t discuss ongoing cases as a general enforcement matter, we did make an exception for the most prominent of these cases, Enron.

 Back To Top

Enron Amicus

The investigation is continuing but, as you know, last year Secretary Chao filed a "friend of the court" brief in federal district court in Houston, arguing that the court should not dismiss a private class action lawsuit filed by current and former Enron employees.

The private lawsuit contends that Enron and a number of its senior officials and others violated ERISA in failing to protect their retirement plans, which were heavily invested in Enron stock, from the loss of millions of dollars when the company collapsed last year.

The Secretary's brief makes a number of important legal points that I would like to mention. First, the fiduciaries responsible for monitoring an Administrative Committee that directly manages the 401(k) plan have a duty under ERISA to ensure that the Administrative Committee is properly performing its duties, and that it has the tools and the information necessary to do its job.

Second, fiduciaries may not deceive plan participants or allow others to do so. They have an obligation to take the appropriate actions to carry out this responsibility. This may include investigating allegations of fraud, disclosing facts to participants, other fiduciaries or the public, and stopping further investment in company stock, as prudence would dictate.

Third, fiduciaries have an obligation to ensure that investments in employer stock in a 401(k) plan are prudent, notwithstanding plan provisions that contemplate or favor such investments in employer stock.

Fourth, even if fiduciaries have “insider information” about the value of employer stock, federal securities law does not prevent the fiduciaries from taking some action to protect the plans – like public disclosure or temporarily suspending further purchase of employer stock.

Finally, directed trustees cannot follow directions that they know or should know are imprudent or violate ERISA. In this case, the plaintiffs alleged that there were “sufficient” red flags suggesting the imprudence of the lockdown that the directed trustee may have had a duty to override the direction to freeze participants’ accounts.

I urge all of you to review the Department’s amicus brief as a reminder of the scope and seriousness of the fiduciary duties associated with 401(k) plans. It is available on the agency’s web site: www.dol.gov/ebsa. I also urge you to encourage your clients to read their plan documents and to think about how they allocate fiduciary responsibility – and to put proper procedures in place so they can fulfill their obligations.

 Back To Top

Conclusion

Let me close by saying that the Administration, the Department, and particularly EBSA, have been hard at work in the last two years ensuring American workers a better, more secure retirement. We have accomplished a number of things, but there is a lot more work to be done. And we need your help.

The private retirement system is essential to American workers and their families. The challenge now before the Administration, the Congress and the industry is to strengthen businesses’ ability to deliver the retirement income and security that workers deserve and depend upon, but to do it in such a way that we don’t discourage employers from offering and maintaining plans for their workers.

I want us to continue to work together to solve problems, not just talk about them. It is our job at the Department to anticipate changes in the industry and enable our workforce to adapt to them.

I look forward to continuing to work with you. Thank you, and I’d be pleased to take a few questions.

About EBSA
Laws & Regulations
Technical Guidance
Compliance Assistance

Consumer Information

FAQs
Contact Us



Phone Numbers