Southern Insect Management Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
Beet / Fall Armyworm
Boll Weevil
Corn Borer
Cotton Bollworm
Soybean Looper
Tobacco Budworm
Velvetbean Caterpillar
Tarnished Plant Bug
 

Research Project: AREA-WIDE CONTROL OF TARNISHED PLANT BUG IN LOUISIANA

Location: Southern Insect Management Research Unit

2005 Annual Report


4d.Progress report.
This report serves to document research conducted under a Specific Cooperative Agreement between Louisiana State University and ARS. Additional details of the research can be found in the report for the parent research project 0500-00044-013-00D, Area-Wide Pest Management of the Tarnished Plant Bug in Cotton in Absence of the Boll Weevil. The research was conducted on commercial farms near Newellton, LA. Two areas, a treated and a non-treated area were established. In the treated area, marginal areas near roads, fields, and ditches were treated with a herbicide in March to kill broadleaf host plants of the tarnished plant bug. Both areas had over 1000 acres of cotton in them. Weed hosts in marginal areas were sample for plant bugs prior to and after treatment. Cotton grown in the areas was sampled weekly for plant bugs weekly during June and July. The early season herbicide treatment caused a significant reduction in numbers of plant bugs found in marginal areas of the treated area as compared to the check area. Tarnished plant bug adult densities were lower in cotton in the treated area as compared to the non-treated area for three weeks during late June to early July in 2004. Densities of nymphs were lower in cotton in the treated area for about five weeks from late June to late July. These results indicated that the herbicide treatment was effective in reducing plant bug infestations in cotton. Samples of runoff water taken in March after the herbicide application, were analyzed for the presence of 2,4-D and Dicamba, both of which are found in the herbicide used in the treated area. No residues were found. The analyses were performed by ANALAB, Corporate Laboratory, Kilgore, TX, using EPA method 8151 for the analyses.


   

 
Project Team
Snodgrass, Gordon
 
Project Annual Reports
  FY 2007
  FY 2006
  FY 2005
 
Related National Programs
  Crop Protection & Quarantine (304)
 
 
Last Modified: 11/08/2008
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House