[Federal Register: March 18, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 52)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11924-11925]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr18mr02-16]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 50
[FRL-7159-8]
National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone; Notice of
Public Meeting
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The purpose of this document is to announce that EPA has
scheduled a public meeting to solicit comments on various options to
implement the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard
(NAAQS). The options contain EPA's preliminary views and are intended
to initiate a dialogue with the public on approaches for implementing
the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA is interested in hearing the views from
interested stakeholders on the options that we've developed and their
ideas on how to best implement the 8-hour ozone NAAQS consistent with
the Supreme Court's decision in Whitman v. American Trucking
Association. An overarching issue that EPA would like public input on
is how EPA should address the Supreme Court's holding that subpart 2 of
part D of title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA) applies for purposes of
classifying areas under a revised ozone NAAQS.
DATES: The one-day meeting will be held from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
(MST) on Wednesday, April 3, 2002, in Tempe, Arizona.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at: Fiesta Inn Resort, 2100 S.
Priest Drive, Tempe, Arizona 85282-1192.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on the
meeting, contact: Denise M. Gerth, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, C539-02, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711,
phone (919) 541-5550, or e-mail: gerth.denise@epa.gov. To register for
the meeting, please contact: Barbara Bauer, E. H. Pechan and
Associates, Durham, NC, phone (919) 493-3144, extension 188, or e-mail:
barbara.bauer@pechan.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 18, 1997, EPA revised the ozone
NAAQS (62 FR 38856). At that time, EPA indicated it would implement the
8-hour ozone NAAQS under the less detailed requirements of subpart 1 of
part D of title I of the CAA rather than more detailed requirements of
subpart 2 requirements. Various industry groups and States challenged
EPA's final rule promulgating the 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the U.S. Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.\1\ In May 1999, the
Appeals Court remanded the ozone standard to EPA on the basis that
EPA's interpretation of its authority under the standard-setting
provisions of the CAA resulted in an unconstitutional delegation of
authority. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. EPA, 175 F.3d 1027, aff'd,
195 F.3d 4 (D.C. Cir. 1999). In addition, the Court held that EPA
improperly interpreted the statute to provide for implementation of the
8-hour standard under subpart 1, but also determined that EPA could not
implement a revised ozone standard under subpart 2. The EPA sought
review of these two issues by the U.S. Supreme Court. In February 2001,
the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the air quality
standard setting. Whitman v. American Trucking Assoc., 121 S. Ct. 903.
In addition, the Supreme Court held that EPA has authority to implement
a revised ozone standard but that EPA could not ignore subpart 2 when
implementing the 8-hour standard. Specifically, the Court noted EPA
could not ignore the provisions of subpart 2 that ``eliminate[s]
regulatory discretion'' allowed by subpart 1. After determining that
EPA could not ignore the provisions of subpart 2, the Court went on to
identify several portions of the classification scheme that are ``ill-
fitted'' to the revised standard, but left it to EPA to develop a
reasonable approach for implementation. Any implementation approach
that EPA develops must address the requirements of the CAA, as
interpreted by the Supreme Court.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On July 18, 1997, EPA also promulgated a revised particulate
matter (PM) standard (62 FR 38652). Litigation on the PM standard
paralleled the litigation on the ozone standard and the court issued
one opinion addressing both challenges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA has initiated a process to obtain stakeholder feedback on
options the Agency is developing for implementation of the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS. The EPA plans to issue a final rule on the implementation
strategy prior to designating areas for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The
implementation rule will provide specific requirements for State and
local air pollution control agencies and tribes to prepare
implementation plans to attain and maintain the 8-hour NAAQS. States
with areas that are not attaining the 8-hour ozone NAAQS will have to
develop--as part of its State implementation plan (SIP)--emission
limits and other requirements to attain the NAAQS within the time
frames set forth in the CAA.\2\ Tribal lands that are not attaining the
8-hour ozone standard may be affected, and could voluntarily submit a
tribal implementation plan (TIP), but would not be required to submit a
TIP. However, in cases where a TIP is not submitted, EPA would have the
responsibility for planning in those areas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The CAA requires EPA to set ambient air quality standards
and requires States to submit SIPs to implement those standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA is holding this meeting in order to obtain stakeholder
feedback regarding the options that EPA has developed as well as to
listen to any new or different ideas that stakeholders may be
interested in presenting. The following topics will be covered at the
meeting: (1) Classifications and attainment dates; (2) designations and
transport; (3) attainment demonstration issues and transportation
planning; and (4) other general SIP issues. New Source Review (NSR)
programs that accompany nonattainment designations will not be the
subject of this meeting since the EPA is currently considering whether
and how to change the NSR program regulations in other contexts. The
EPA has placed a variety of materials regarding implementation options,
and which will be the focus of the meeting, on the website:
www.epa.gov/ttn/rto/ozonetech/o3imp8hr/o3imp8hr.htm. Additional
material will be placed on the website as they are developed.
[[Page 11925]]
Anyone interested in attending the meeting should check the website for
new material on a regular basis prior to the meetings.
The materials that are available on the website are also available
at: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Docket Number A-
2001-31, U.S. EPA, 401 M Street, SW., Room M-1500 (Mail Code 6102),
Washington, DC 20460. The docket is available for public inspection and
copying between 8:00 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. A reasonable fee may be charged for copying.
Henry C. Thomas,
Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 02-6491 Filed 3-15-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P