[Federal Register: July 23, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 141)]
[Notices]               
[Page 48166-48167]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr23jy02-737]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP02-57-001]

 
SCG Pipeline, Inc.; Notice of Amendment

July 17, 2002.
    Take notice that on July 11, 2002, SCG Pipeline, Inc (SCG), P.O. 
Box 102407, Columbia, South Carolina, 29224-2407, filed in Docket No. 
CP02-57-001 an amendment to its application pursuant to section 7(c) of 
the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and the Commission's Rules and Regulations, 
all as more thoroughly described in the application on file with the 
Commission and open to public inspection. This filing may be viewed on 
the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``RIMS'' link, select ``Docket 
'' and follow the instructions (please call (202) 208-2222 for 
assistance).
    In its original application in this proceeding, SCG requested 
authorization for the following:
    (i) A certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing 
SCG to construct, install, and operate natural gas pipeline facilities, 
and to acquire from Southern Natural Gas Company (Southern) an interest 
in the capacity of pipeline facilities (the Twin 30s) in Georgia, and 
South Carolina;
    (ii) A blanket certificate of public convenience and necessity 
pursuant to Part 284, Subpart G of the Commission regulations 
authorizing the transportation of gas for others;
    (iii) A blanket certificate of public convenience and necessity 
under Part 157, Subpart F of the Commission's regulations authorizing 
the construction, acquisition, abandonment and operation of certain 
facilities,
    SCG states the purpose of this amendment is to comply with Ordering 
Paragraph (A) contained in the Commission's order granting a 
Preliminary Determination on Non-Environmental Issues to SCG on June 
26, 2002 \1\ (``June 26 Order''). The June 26 Order required SCG to 
amend its proposal to provide that SCG will acquire from Southern an 
undivided interest in the Twin 30s assets. Accordingly, SCG has filed 
an Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement between SCG and 
Southern to provide that SCG will acquire such an ownership interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 99 FERC [para] 61345 (2002)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding SCG's amendment should be directed to Troy 
Blalock, Project Manager, SCG Pipeline, Inc., 105 New Way Road, 
Columbia, South, Carolina, 28223 at (803) 217-1811 or by fax at (803) 
217-2104.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of 
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by 
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or 
before August 7, 2002, file with the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a motion to 
intervene in accordance with the requirements of the Commission's Rules 
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) and the 
Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 
status will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary 
of the Commission and will receive copies of all documents filed by the 
applicant and by all other parties. A party must submit 14 copies of 
filings made with the Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant 
and to every other party in the proceeding. Only parties to the 
proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders in the 
proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have 
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with 
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and 
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project. 
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the 
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will 
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's

[[Page 48167]]

rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project 
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly 
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of 
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments 
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be 
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive 
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings 
associated with the Commission's environmental review process. 
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed 
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will 
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by 
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents 
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court 
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission may issue a preliminary determination on non-
environmental issues prior to the completion of its review of the 
environmental aspects of the project. This preliminary determination 
typically considers such issues as the need for the project and its 
economic effect on existing customers of the applicant, on other 
pipelines in the area, and on landowners and communities. For example, 
the Commission considers the extent to which the applicant may need to 
exercise eminent domain to obtain rights-of-way for the proposed 
project and balances that against the non-environmental benefits to be 
provided by the project. Therefore, if a person has comments on 
community and landowner impacts from this proposal, it is important 
either to file comments or to intervene as early in the process as 
possible.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically 
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and 
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' 
link.
    If the Commission decides to set the application for a formal 
hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Commission will issue 
another notice describing that process. At the end of the Commission's 
review process, a final Commission order approving or denying a 
certificate will be issued.

Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 02-18536 Filed 7-22-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P