skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov

Previous Section

Content Last Revised: 11/13/71
---DISCLAIMER---

Next Section

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to ESA

Title 29  

Labor

 

Chapter V  

Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor

 

 

Part 782  

Exemption from Maximum Hours Provisions for Certain Employees of Motor Carriers


29 CFR 782.4 - Drivers' helpers.

  • Section Number: 782.4
  • Section Name: Drivers' helpers.

    (a) A Driver's ``helper,'' as defined for Motor Carrier Act 
jurisdiction (Ex Parte Nos. MC-2 and MC-3, 28 M.C.C. 125, 135, 136, 138, 
139), is an employee other than a driver, who is required to ride on a 
motor vehicle when it is being operated in interstate or foreign 
commerce within the meaning of the Motor Carrier Act. (The term does not 
include employees who ride on the vehicle and act as assistants or 
relief drivers. Ex
parte Nos. MC-2 and MC-3, supra. See Sec. 782.3.) This definition has 
classified all such employees, including armed guards on armored trucks 
and conductorettes on buses, as ``helpers'' with respect to whom he has 
power to establish qualifications and maximum hours of service because 
of their engagement in some or all of the following activities which, in 
his opinion, directly affect the safety of operation of such motor 
vehicles in interstate or foreign commerce (Ex parte Nos. MC-2 and MC-3, 
28 M.C.C. 125, 135-136): Assist in loading the vehicles (they may also 
assist in unloading (Ex parte Nos. MC-2 and MC-3, supra), an activity 
which has been held not to affect ``safety of operation,'' see 
Sec. 782.5(c); as to what it meant by ``loading'' which directly affects 
``safety of operation,'' see Sec. 782.5(a)); dismount when the vehicle 
approaches a railroad crossing and flag the driver across the tracks, 
and perform a similar duty when the vehicle is being turned around on a 
busy highway or when it is entering or emerging from a driveway; in case 
of a breakdown: (1) Place the flags, flares, and fuses as required by 
the safety regulations. (2) go for assistance while the driver protects 
the vehicle on the highway, or vice versa, or (3) assist the driver in 
changing tires or making minor repairs; and assist in putting on or 
removing chains.
    (b) An employee may be a ``helper'' under the official definition 
even though such safety-affecting activities constitute but a minor part 
of his job. Thus, although the primary duty of armed guards on armored 
trucks is to protect the valuables in the case of attempted robberies, 
they are classified as ``helpers'' where they ride on such trucks being 
operated in interstate or foreign commerce, because, in the case of an 
accident or other emergency and in other respects, they act in a 
capacity somewhat similar to that of the helpers described in the text. 
Similarly, conductorettes on buses whose primary duties are to see to 
the comfort of the passengers are classified as ``helpers'' whose such 
buses are being operated in interstate or foreign commerce, because in 
instances when accidents occur, they help the driver in obtaining aid 
and protect the vehicle from oncoming traffic.
    (c) In accordance with principles previously stated (see 
Sec. 782.2), the section 13(b)(1) exemption applies to employees who 
are, under the Secretary of Transporation's definitions, engaged in such 
activities as full- or partial-duty ``helpers'' on motor vehicles being 
operated in transporation in interstate or foreign commerce within the 
meaning of the Motor Carrier Act. (Ispass v. Pyramid Motor Freight 
Corp., 152 F. (2d) 619 (C.A. 2); Walling v. McGinley Co. (E.D. Tenn.), 
12 Labor Cases, par. 63,731, 6 W.H. Cases 916. See also Levinson v. 
Spector Motor Service, 330 U.S. 649; Pyramid Motor Freight Corp. v. 
Ispass, 330 U.S. 695; Dallum v. Farmers, Coop Trucking Assn. 46 F. Supp. 
785 (D. Minn.).) The exemption has been held inapplicable to so-called 
helpers who ride on motor vehicles but do not engage in any of the 
activities of ``helpers'' which have been found to affect directly the 
safety of operation of such vehicles in interstate or foreign commerce. 
(Walling v. Gordon's Transports (W.D. Tenn.) 10 Labor Cases par. 62,934, 
6 W.H. Cases 831, affirmed 162 F. (2d) 203 (C.A. 6), certiorari denied, 
332 U.S. 774 (helpers on city ``pickup and delivery trucks'' where it 
was not shown that the loading in any manner affected safety of 
operation and the helper's activities were ``in no manner similar'' to 
those of a driver's helper in over-the-road operation).) It should be 
noted also that an employee, to be exempted as a driver's ``helper'' 
under the Secretary's definitions, must be ``required'' as part of his 
job to ride on a motor vehicle when it is being operated in interstate 
or foreign commerce; an employee of a motor carrier is not exempted as a 
``helper'' when he rides on such a vehicle, not as a matter of fixed 
duty, but merely as a convenient means of getting himself to, from, or 
between places where he performs his assigned work. (See Pyramid Motor 
Freight Corp. v. Ispass, 330 U.S. 695, modifying, on other grounds, 152 
F. (2d) 619 (C.A. 2).)
Previous Section

Next Section



Phone Numbers