[Federal Register: November 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 211)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 64118-64121]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01no06-5]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
New Standards for Mailing Sharps and Other Regulated Medical
Waste Containers
AGENCY: Postal Service.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service revises the standards for mailing sharps
and other regulated medical waste containers. The new standards include
improvements to the packaging, the package testing, and the process for
authorizing and suspending authorization.
DATES: Effective Date: November 9, 2006.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bert Olsen, 202-268-7276.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
We published a proposed rule in the Federal Register (71 FR 19840,
April 18, 2006) to revise the standards for mailing sharps and other
regulated medical waste containers. Our proposal included the following
changes:
1. To require container vendors to provide the Postal Service with
the names and addresses of their distributors and to provide updates on
a quarterly basis.
2. To revise the process for authorizing and suspending
authorization for mailing sharps and other regulated medical waste
containers to enhance monitoring and control of medical waste in the
mail.
3. To revise container standards and container testing standards to
ensure that container testing is performed on a consistent basis for
all sharps and other regulated medical waste containers.
Comments Received
We received comments from four authorized sharps container vendors
and one potential vendor. All commenters supported the concept of
revising the rules to promote uniform testing methods and to ensure the
integrity of mailpieces containing sharps and other medical waste.
Documentation Requirements
Three commenters objected to the requirement that vendors provide a
list of distributors to the Postal Service. All three commenters argued
that requiring vendors to provide a quarterly list of distributors
could lead to disclosure of sensitive proprietary vendor information.
We agree that the Postal Service can identify a vendor's distributors,
if needed, by requiring vendors to provide this information on request.
Therefore, the final rule requires vendors to provide the names,
addresses, and telephone numbers of their distributors to the Postal
Service only on request.
Packaging
One commenter objected to a minimum size limit for the biohazard
symbol placed on the outer shipping container. The commenter stated
that requiring a 3 inch by 4 inch symbol would be excessively large on
a small mailpiece. The Postal Service notes that currently no approved
medical waste mailpieces are so small as to not easily accommodate a 3
inch by 4 inch biohazard symbol. The new standard will clarify that the
3 inch by 4 inch label requirement applies to the outer shipping
container. For safety reasons, medical waste containers must be easily
identified as containing biohazardous materials. Therefore, this final
rule adopts the standard as published in the proposal.
Three commenters did not want the Postal Service to eliminate the
use of outer shipping containers with interlocking bottoms. All three
commenters stated that current requirements that allow for the use of
shipping containers with interlocking bottom flaps reinforced with tape
are more than adequate, especially considering the overall rigorous
testing mandates. After further consultation with package testing
professionals, we conclude that interlocking bottom flaps sufficiently
contain the primary receptacle, particularly when reinforced with tape.
Therefore, we will maintain our current standards that allow
interlocking bottoms when they are reinforced with water-resistant
tape.
Two commenters requested clarification of the proposed changes to
the secondary container requirements. The commenters stated that
increasing the plastic bag thickness requirement from 3 mil to 4 mil
was not necessary. In addition, they stated that it was not
advantageous to require the plastic bag
[[Page 64119]]
to be placed around the secondary box. We believe that increasing the
thickness of the plastic bag will help maintain the contents of the
primary container should it break. Therefore, we will require plastic
bags to be 4 mil thick. However, we will not require the plastic bag to
be placed outside the secondary box.
Two commenters requested clarification of the proposed standards in
section 601.10.17.7b4 of Mailing Standards of the United States Postal
Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM). We revised this section to clarify
that the absorbent material must be placed in the primary receptacle.
Item e10 will serve as the required test to ensure that the secondary
system is watertight.
One commenter suggested that the Postal Service require screw caps
for primary containers. Historical data on safely mailing these
mailpieces does not indicate a need to require screw caps. Therefore,
this final rule adopts the standard as published in the proposal.
Mailpiece Testing
One commenter objected to the requirement that mailpieces be tested
at the vendor's identified maximum weight and that the container's
maximum allowable weight be printed on the outer shipping container.
The commenter stated that it was impossible to predict the maximum
weight of the materials that might be placed into a container and that
end users would not have scales to weigh the mailpiece. We believe, in
the interest of safety, that these mailpieces should be tested at the
highest possible weight determined by the vendor, not to exceed 25
pounds, to ensure that the mailpiece can safely contain the maximum
weight. Therefore, this final rule adopts the requirements as published
in the proposal.
One commenter suggested that the Postal Service require
accreditation of package testing facilities. Section 601.10.17.7d of
the proposed rule states ``the Postal Service may require proof of
accreditation or other documentation to support the credentials of an
independent testing facility.'' We believe that this standard provides
the authority to require proof of credentials as necessary. Therefore,
this final rule adopts the standard as published in the proposal.
One commenter questioned the need for a reference to 49 CFR
178.604, Leak-proof test. The commenter stated that we should not refer
to the test because our pass/fail criteria were not the same as the
criteria in 49 CFR. The test in 49 CFR 178.604 requires that the
primary container hold 20 kPa without leakage. Our criteria allow for
air leakage around the opening of the primary container as long as
there is no air leakage anywhere else and no leakage of water. We agree
that it would be clearer, in this case, to eliminate the reference and
to provide only the USPS test procedure and pass/fail criteria.
One commenter requested clarification on the height of the required
drop tests. Our proposed rule requires 30-foot drops for the wet and
cold tests as identified in 49 CFR 178.609e and f. The impact test
requires a drop of 3 feet as identified in 49 CFR 178.609h. While we
understand that the test identified in 49 CFR consists of requirements
for packaging infectious substances, we believe that the Postal
Service's handling and transportation systems are different from those
of commercial carriers and require more stringent acceptance criteria.
Therefore, this final rule adopts the standard as published in the
proposal.
One commenter suggested that testing material should be simulated
medical waste. We disagree. The testing material should consist of
sharps or other regulated medical waste as defined in DMM 601.10.17.2e
and g. Vendors are on notice that contaminated medical waste will not
be used for testing purposes. Therefore, this final rule adopts the
standard as published in the proposal.
Mailpiece Acceptance
One commenter objected to requirements that vendors retrieve
improperly labeled containers when identified and held at plants. The
commenter suggested that the Postal Service should confirm the
mailpiece was properly marked and labeled before accepting it. While we
continually educate employees on acceptance criteria, the mailer
remains responsible for properly labeling the mailpiece. Therefore,
this final rule adopts the requirement as published in the proposal.
This final rule will be effective on November 9, 2006. Sharps and
other regulated medical waste containers that are currently approved
for mailing can maintain their authorization until it expires (24
months from the most recent approval). Containers must meet the new
standards if they are submitted for authorization (or renewal of
authorization) on or after November 9.
We adopt the following amendments to Mailing Standards of the
United States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), incorporated
by reference in the Code of Federal Regulations. See 39 CFR 111.1.
List of Subjects in 39 CFR Part 111
Administrative practice and procedure, Postal Service.
0
Accordingly, 39 CFR part 111 is amended as follows:
PART 111--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 39 CFR part 111 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 39 U.S.C. 101, 401, 403, 404, 414,
416, 3001-3011, 3201-3219, 3403-3406, 3621, 3626, 5001.
0
2. Revise the following sections of Mailing Standards of the United
States Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual (DMM), as follows:
600 Basic Standards for All Mailing Services
601 Mailability
* * * * *
10.0 Hazardous Materials
* * * * *
10.17 Infectious Substances (Hazard Class 6, Division 6.2)
* * * * *
[Revise title of 10.17.7 as follows:]
10.17.7 Sharps Medical Waste and Regulated Medical Waste Containers
[Replace ``distributor or manufacturer'' with ``vendor'' throughout
10.17.7.]
* * * * *
[Add new authorization information to the end of item a1 as
follows:]
1. * * * Vendors that market their containers to distributors are
responsible for disposal and cleanup costs attributed to those
containers. In addition, vendors must provide a list of distributors,
including firm names, addresses, and telephone numbers, to the Postal
Service on request.
* * * * *
[Revise item a3 to add ``name'' and ``phone number'' as follows:]
3. Name, address, and phone number of each storage and disposal
site.
* * * * *
[Add text at the end of item a8 as follows:]
8. * * * and verification that the merchandise return service (MRS)
permit fee and accounting fee have been paid.
[Add new item a9 as follows:]
9. Address of the post office or postage due unit where the
containers are delivered.
* * * * *
[Revise the package testing information in item b1 by replacing the
last sentence as follows:]
[[Page 64120]]
1. * * * Package testing results must show that the contents of the
primary container did not penetrate through the primary container
during package testing and that the primary container can maintain its
integrity at temperatures as low as 0[deg]F and as high as 120[deg]F.
[Revise the third sentence of item b2 to read ``4 mil'' as
follows:]
2. * * * If one of the components is a plastic bag, the bag must be
at least 4 mil in thickness and must be used in conjunction with a
fiberboard box. * * *
* * * * *
[Revise item b4 by replacing ``a watertight barrier'' with ``the
primary receptacle'' as follows:]
4. There must be enough material within the primary receptacle * *
*
[Revise item b5 as follows:]
5. Each mailpiece must not weigh more than 25 pounds. The
container's maximum allowable weight must be printed on the outside of
the box and on the assembly and closure instructions included with each
mailpiece. The mailpiece must be tested at the maximum allowable weight
identified by the vendor.
* * * * *
[Add a new sentence at the end of item c1 as follows:]
1. * * * Place the label on the top or on a side of the container.
[Add a new sentence at the end of item c2 as follows:]
2. * * * The symbol on the outer shipping container must be at
least 3 inches high and 4 inches wide.
* * * * *
[Add new item c7 as follows:]
7. Vendors must retrieve mailpieces held at processing facilities
due to improper labeling such as no return address or due to improperly
completed shipping papers.
* * * * *
[Revise item d as follows:]
d. Package Testing. Vendors must submit to the manager, Mailing
Standards (see 608.8 for address), package testing results from an
independent testing facility for each package for which the vendor is
requesting authorization. In addition, vendors must submit package
testing results from an independent testing facility when the design of
a container system changes or every 24 months, whichever occurs first.
The test results must show that if every mailpiece prepared for mailing
were subject to the environmental and test conditions in 49 CFR and the
additional test requirements in 10.17.7e, no contents would be released
into the environment and the effectiveness of the packaging would not
be significantly reduced. The Postal Service may require proof of
accreditation or other documentation to support the credentials of an
independent testing facility.
[Add new item e as follows:]
e. Testing Criteria. Each mailpiece must pass each of the tests
described below:
1. Leak-proof test. The test must be conducted on one primary
receptacle with the lid in place, without the secondary and outer
packaging. The test duration must be at least 5 minutes and must be
conducted at 20 kPa (3 psi). The pass/fail criterion is: No air leakage
from anywhere other than the closure of the primary receptacle. Air
leakage at the closure is not considered a failure if the primary
receptacle passes the test for watertightness as determined by placing
50 ml of deionized water into the primary receptacle, securing the
closure, and then turning the container on its side and observing for
any evidence of leakage. Any evidence of water leaking from the primary
receptacle is a failure.
2. Stacking test. One mailpiece must withstand the test in 49 CFR
178.606. The dynamic compression test must be conducted on the empty,
unsealed mailpiece assembled for mailing, without the primary
receptacle(s). The test mass is the vendor-identified maximum weight,
not to exceed 25 pounds, as indicated on the outer shipping container
and on the assembly and closing instructions. A compensation factor of
1.5 must be used to compute the test load, based on the vendor-
identified weight. The pass/fail criteria are: No buckling of the
sidewalls sufficient to cause damage to the contents in the primary
container, and in no case does the deflection exceed 1 inch.
3. Vibration test. One mailpiece filled with sharps or other
regulated medical waste must withstand the test in 49 CFR 178.608. The
test mailpiece is filled with sharps or other regulated medical waste
to the vendor-identified maximum weight, not to exceed 25 pounds, as
indicated on the outer shipping container and on the assembly and
closing instructions. The test sample is prepared as it would be for
mailing. The pass/fail criterion is: No rupture, cracking, or splitting
of any primary receptacle.
4. Wet drop test. Five mailpieces filled with sharps or other
regulated medical waste must withstand the test in 49 CFR 178.609e.
Each test mailpiece is filled with sharps or other regulated medical
waste to the vendor-identified maximum weight, not to exceed 25 pounds,
as indicated on the outer shipping container and on the assembly and
closing instructions included with each mailpiece. Each mailpiece is
prepared as it would be for mailing and subjected to the water spray as
described in the test. A separate, untested mailpiece is used for each
drop orientation: Top, longest side, shortest side, and corner. The
pass/fail criteria are: No rupture, cracking, or splitting of any
primary receptacle, and no contents may penetrate into or through the
body or lid of any primary receptacle.
5. Cold drop test. Five mailpieces filled with sharps or other
regulated medical waste must withstand the test in 49 CFR 178.609f.
Each test mailpiece is filled with sharps or other regulated medical
waste to the vendor-identified maximum weight, not to exceed 25 pounds,
as indicated on the outer shipping container and on the assembly and
closing instructions included with each mailpiece. Each mailpiece is
prepared as it would be for mailing and chilled as described in the
test. A separate, untested mailpiece is used for each drop orientation:
Top, longest side, shortest side, and corner. The pass/fail criteria
are: No rupture, cracking, or splitting of any primary receptacle, and
no contents may penetrate into or through the body or lid of any
primary receptacle.
6. Impact test. One mailpiece filled with sharps or other regulated
medical waste must withstand the test in 49 CFR 178.609h. The test
mailpiece is filled with sharps or other regulated medical waste to the
vendor-identified maximum weight, not to exceed 25 pounds, as indicated
on the outer shipping container and on the assembly and closing
instructions included with each mailpiece. The mailpiece is prepared as
it would be for mailing. The pass/fail criteria are: No rupture,
cracking, or splitting of any primary receptacle, and no contents may
penetrate into or through the body or lid of any primary receptacle.
7. Puncture-resistant test. Package testing results must show that
during all of the previous tests, the contents did not penetrate
through the primary container.
8. Temperature test. Package testing results must show that each
primary receptacle maintained its integrity when exposed to
temperatures as low as 0[deg]F and as high as 120[deg]F.
9. Absorbency test. Package testing results must show that the
primary receptacle(s) contain enough absorbent material to absorb three
times the total liquid allowed within the primary receptacle in case of
leakage. Absorbency is determined by pouring 150 ml of deionized water
into the
[[Page 64121]]
primary receptacle(s), then turning the receptacle(s) upside down and
observing for any evidence of free liquid not absorbed on contact. Any
evidence of free liquid is a failure.
10. Watertight test. Package testing results must show that no
leakage occurred when 50 ml of deionized water was placed into the
secondary containment system and the entire system turned upside down
for 5 minutes.
[Add new item f as follows:]
f. Suspension of Authorization.
1. The Postal Service may suspend a vendor's authorization based on
information that a mailpiece no longer meets the standards for mailing
sharps medical waste and regulated medical waste containers, or that
the mailpiece poses an unreasonable safety risk to Postal Service
employees or the public. The suspension can be made immediately, making
the mailpiece nonmailable immediately. The vendor may contest a
decision to suspend authorization by writing to the manager, Mailing
Standards (see 608.8 for address), within 7 days from the date of the
letter of suspension. The appeal should provide evidence demonstrating
why the decision should be reconsidered. Any order suspending
authorization remains in effect during an appeal or other challenge.
2. When a vendor is notified that its authorization to mail sharps
or other regulated medical waste containers has been suspended, the
vendor must immediately: (1) Recall all identified containers. (2)
Notify all customers that they cannot mail the identified containers.
(3) Suspend sales and distribution of all identified containers. (4)
Collect the identified containers from distributors, consumers, and the
Postal Service without using the mail and in accordance with all
Federal and State regulations.
* * * * *
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E6-18063 Filed 10-31-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P