OMB No. 2010-0032
Expiration Date 01/31/2010
2003 Performance Track Annual Performance Report

















BAE Systems Controls
A050044
Year 3 Annual Performance Report

























SECTION A: GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION

A.1Name of your facility:
BAE Systems Controls

A.2Name of your parent company:
BAE Systems

A.3Facility contact person for the Performance Track program:
  Name:Mr. Paul Oberley
  Title:ESH Specialist
  Phone:(260) 434-5423
  Fax:(260) 434-5151
  Email:paul.a.oberley@baesystems.com

A.4

Facility location:
  Street Address:2000 Taylor Street
  Address Cont:PO Box 2232
  City:Fort Wayne
  State:IN
  Zip Code:46802


Mailing address (if different from above):
  Mailing Address:
  Address Cont:
  City:
  State:
  Zip Code:

A.5

Facility's website address (if any):
http://baesystemscontrols.com/Facilities.htm

A.6

Number of employees (full-time equivalents) who currently work in the facility:
500-1,000

A.7

North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code(s) that is(are) used to classify business at the facility:
334519  334511      

A.8

In your application and, perhaps, in previous annual performance reports, you described what your facility does or makes. Have there been any (additional) changes to your facility's list of products and/or activities? If yes, please list them here:

No Changes


A.9

Have the environmental requirements applicable to your facility changed during this reporting period? If yes, please describe these changes here.

No Changes



SECTION B: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

B.1.aWhen was an EMS assessment last conducted by an independent party at your facility?
2003

If an assessment was conducted during 2003, please provide the type (e.g., ISO 14001 certification), the scope, and the month(s) of each assessment.

Type
Scope
Dates
ISO 14001 Re-Registration Audit The scope of this audit was the entire ISO 14001 EMS standard, as applied to all operations and processes at our facility. As such, each element of the standard was covered, including: Environmental Aspects, Objectives and Targets, Environmental Management Programmes, Communication, Operational Control, Monitoring and Measurement, Document Control, Environmental Policy, Legal & Other requirements, Structure & Responsibility, EMS Audits, Management Review, Training Awareness & Competence, Nonconformance & Corrective & Preventive Actions, Emergency Preparedness and Records.   March  2003  
ISO 14001 Surveillance Audit Reviewed: Document Control, Nonconformance and corrective & preventive actions, environmental management programme, EMS audits, and Management Review.
In Detail: Environmental Policy, Environmental Aspects, and Communications.
  September  2003  



B.1.bWhen was an internal EMS assessment last conducted at your facility?
2003

If an assessment was conducted during 2003, please provide the scope and month(s) of each assessment.

Scope
Dates

Monitoring & measurement; Nonconformance and corrective and preventive action; Records; Environmental Management System Audit; and Management Review

March  2003

Environmental Policy, Environmental Aspects, Legal & Other requirements, Objectives & Targets, Environmental Management Programmes, Structure & Responsibility; Training, Awareness & Competence; Communication, Environmental Management System documentation, Document control, Operational Control, and Emergency Preparedness and Response.

September  2003



B.1.cWhen was an internal or corporate compliance audit last conducted at your facility?
2003

If an audit was conducted during 2003, please provide the scope and the month(s) of each audit, and indicate who conducted the audit(s) (e.g., facility staff, corporate groups, third party). (Don't include audits, inspections, or site visits by regulatory or external organizations).

Scope
Dates
Who conducted the audit

We have monthly audits which together cover every part of our facility. Environmental aspects are a part of these audits.

December  2003In-house ESH (Environmental, Safety and Health) team

Our non-hazardous and hazardous waste Satellite Accumulation areas are inspected twice weekly by an outside vendor (certified in 24-Hr HAZWOPER) and once a week by our department.

December  2003Outside vendor and ESH department.



B.1.d(Optional) If you would like to describe any other audits or inspections that were conducted at your facility, please do so here.



B.1.eBriefly summarize corrective actions taken and other improvements made as a result of your EMS assessments and compliance audits.

Employee awareness of the Environmental, Safety and Health Policy was determined to be lacking among some employees.

The employees were reminded of the Environmental, Safety and Health Policy through training and aisle meetings.


B.1.fHas your facility corrected all instances of potential non-compliance and EMS non-conformance identified during your audits and other assessments?
Yes

If no, please explain your plans to correct these instances.



B.1.gWhen was the last Senior Management review of your EMS completed?
February  2004
Who was the senior manager present at the review?
Name: Mr. Todd Rash
Title: Director, Operations

B.2.aISO 14001 Certification. Is your facility currently certified to ISO 14001?
Yes

B.2.bIs your facility a Responsible Care-certified facility?


B.3Environmental Aspects Identification. When did your facility last conduct a systematic identification and/or review of your environmental aspects?
February  2004

B.4Progress Toward Achieving Objectives and Targets. In the table below, please provide a narrative summary of progress made toward EMS objectives and targets other than those reported as Environmental Performance Commitments in Section C. You may limit the summary to environmental aspects that are significant and towards which progress has been made during the reporting year. Do you have additional environmental aspects to report? Yes



Environmental Aspect
Progress Made This Year (e.g., quantitative or qualitative improvements, activities conducted)
Legal & Other RequirementsIn 2003, BAE Systems Fort Wayne subscribed to an online subscription service which streamlined the process of regulatory review. Rather than having to actively seek out regulatory updates, we have them summarized and e-mailed to us, with a link to the complete citation.
Air EmissionsInitiated effort aimed at reducing delivery vehicle running time, reinforcing the message to drivers to stop their engines upon entering the dock. This was done through increased communication in the form of one-on-one communication with the drivers and installation of additional signage. This project originated from employee complaints in the winter of 2002-2003. Since spring 2003, no such complaints (about engines being left on) have been registered.
Non-Regulated WasteInstalled new Selective soldering machine to replace outdated and more wasteful machine used to solder connectors. This new process results in decreased lead air emissions and the generation of less solder dross. The machine achieves this chiefly because it is more efficient and precise, resulting in less wasted solder.
Environmental Management Systems CommunicationsEnvironmental Management Systems communication - In January 2003, the ESH manager spoke on our company's experience with ISO 14001 to a class at Valparaiso University. This was done at the University's request.



SECTION C: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENTS

COMMITMENT 1

Category:Energy Use
Aspect:Total Energy Use
Specific Information on Aspect (Optional):Annual Kwh consumption

Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
Actual Quantity (per year):
18,285,696
19,776,464
17,460,365
18,537,001
16,457,124
Measurement Units:
KwH
  Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.22
1.21
1.11
1.0 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
units produced
Normalized Quantity per year:
18,285,696
16210216.39
14430053.72
16700000.9
16457124
* Estimated

C.1.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
We continued to benefit from the cleaner, more stable energy in our test areas. The project to replace workstation lighting continued. The normalized value for our electrical consumption increased over that for 2002. Our production output was greater in 2002, and since some of the electricity consumption is 'fixed', (such as lighting), the normalized value increased in 2003.

C.1.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



COMMITMENT 2

Category:Waste
Aspect:Hazardous Solid Waste
Specific Information on Aspect (Optional):Total Plantwide waste

Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
Actual Quantity (per year):
43,578
33,143
25,566
27228
32,684
Measurement Units:
lbs
  Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.22
1.21
1.11
1.0 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
units produced
Normalized Quantity per year:
43,578
27166.39
21128.93
24529.73
32684
* Estimated

C.2.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
Reduced volume of Hazardous Waste generated from painting/coating process by pursuing and achieving an engineering change which eliminated the requirement for certain units to be painted. We continued to benefit from the switch to smaller packaging for many of our process materials, which results in less wasted (expired) material.

C.2.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



COMMITMENT 3

Category:Materials Use
Aspect:Hazardous Materials Use
Specific Information on Aspect (Optional):Solder used in wave solder process

Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2000
2001
2002
2003
2003
Actual Quantity (per year):
10,428
5,196
1,596
1730
7,296
Measurement Units:
lbs
  Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.22
1.21
1.11
1.0 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
units produced
Normalized Quantity per year:
10,428
4259.02
1319.01
1558.56
7296
* Estimated

C.3.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
The introduction of the inert wave solder environment continued to help us reach this goal. The introduction of the gaseous nitrogen environment results in a much decreased rate of solder oxidation, meaning that less dross is generated and therefore less need to replace the oxidized solder.

C.3.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



COMMITMENT 4

Category:Waste
Aspect:Hazardous Solid Waste
Specific Information on Aspect (Optional):Stencil Cleaner Waste

Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
1999
2001
2002
2003
2003
Actual Quantity (per year):
1,656
0
160
160
165
Measurement Units:
lbs
  Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.22
1.21
1.11
1.0 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
units produced
Normalized Quantity per year:
1656
0
132.23
144.14
165
* Estimated

C.4.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
The reduction in hazardous waste from the stencil sleaning process is the result of a one-time change in equipment. The change to a closed-loop system from an open system is the reason for this reduction. The only waste generated from this process is a quarterly replacement of approximately 5 gallons of Isopropyl Alcohol, which is recycled on site.

C.4.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



SECTION D: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND PERFORMANCE REPORTING




D.1Please briefly describe the activities that your facility conducted during the year to interact with the community on environmental issues and to report publicly on environmental performance.

We continued to perform community outreach in the form of Enviroscape environmental demonstrations. The demonstrations teach elementary school childrean about the creation and migration of pollution via a model of a small community. Our department also responds to requests form information about our Environmental management system. Our manager spoke to a class at Valparaiso on the subject of the ISO 14001 standard in January of 2003.

D.2Please indicate which of the following methods your facility plans to use to make its Performance Track Annual Performance Report available to the public.

Web Site
URL: http://baesystemscontrols.com/Facilities.htm


Attachments (if applicable) :