[Federal Register: April 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 65)]
[Notices]               
[Page 16765-16766]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05ap07-39]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-866]

 
Folding Gift Boxes from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On December 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce 
(``Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty 
order on folding gift boxes from the People's Republic of China 
(``PRC''), pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``Act''). See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 71 
FR 69545 (December 1, 2006) (``Sunset Initiation''); see also Notice of 
Antidumping Duty Order: Certain Folding Gift Boxes From the People's 
Republic of China, 67 FR 864 (January 8, 2002) (``Order''). Based on 
the notice of intent to participate and response filed by the domestic 
interested party, and the lack of response from respondent interested 
parties, the Department conducted an expedited sunset review of the 
Order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 C.F.R. 
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). As a result of this sunset review, the 
Department finds that revocation of the Order would likely lead to 
continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels indicated in the 
``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 5, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita H. Chen or Robert A. Bolling; 
AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 202-482-1904 and 202-482-3434, 
respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On December 1, 2006, the Department initiated a sunset review of 
the Order on folding gift boxes from the PRC pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act. See Sunset Initiation. On December 15, 2006, the Department 
timely received a notice of intent to participate from Simkins 
Industries, Inc. (``Simkins''), pursuant to 19 C.F.R. 351.218(d)(1)(i). 
Simkins claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the 
Act as a domestic producer of subject merchandise. On January 3, 2007, 
the Department received a request from Harvard Folding Box Company, 
Inc. (``Harvard Box''), asking to be substituted for Simkins as the 
domestic interested party in the sunset review. Both Simkins and 
Harvard Box are represented by the same counsel. Harvard Box also filed 
a substantive response within the 30-day deadline as specified in 19 
C.F.R. 351.218(d)(3)(i). The Department did not receive any objections 
to Harvard Box's request to be substituted for Simkins. The Department 
did not receive a substantive response from any respondent interested 
party. As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 
C.F.R. 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department conducted an expedited 
sunset review of the Order.

Scope Of The Order

    The products covered by the order are certain folding gift boxes. 
Folding gift boxes are a type of folding or knock-down carton 
manufactured from paper or paperboard. Folding gift boxes are produced 
from a variety of recycled and virgin paper or paperboard materials, 
including, but not limited to, clay-coated paper or paperboard and 
kraft (bleached or unbleached) paper or paperboard. The scope of the 
order excludes gift boxes manufactured from paper or paperboard of a 
thickness of more than 0.8 millimeters, corrugated paperboard, or paper 
mache. The scope of the order also excludes those gift boxes for which 
no side of the box, when assembled, is at least nine inches in length.
    Folding gift boxes included in the scope of the order are typically 
decorated with a holiday motif using various processes, including 
printing, embossing, debossing, and foil stamping, but may also be 
plain white or printed with a single color. The subject merchandise 
includes folding gift boxes, with or without handles, whether finished 
or unfinished, and whether in one-piece or multi-piece configuration. 
One-piece gift boxes are die-cut or otherwise formed so that the top, 
bottom, and sides form a single, contiguous unit. Two-piece gift boxes 
are those with a folded bottom and a folded top as separate pieces. 
Folding gift boxes are generally packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane, 
or other packaging materials, in single or multi-box packs for sale to 
the retail customer. The scope of the order excludes folding gift boxes 
that have a retailer's name, logo, trademark or similar company 
information printed prominently on the box's top exterior (such folding 
gift boxes are often known as ``not-for-resale'' gift boxes or ``give-
away'' gift boxes and may be provided by department and specialty 
stores at no charge to their retail customers). The scope of the order 
also excludes folding gift boxes where both the outside of the box is a 
single color and the box is not packaged in shrink-wrap, cellophane, 
other resin-based packaging films, or paperboard.
    Imports of the subject merchandise are classified under Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings 
4819.20.0040 and 4819.50.4060. These subheadings also cover products 
that are outside the scope of the order. Furthermore, although the 
HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, 
our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.

Analysis Of Comments Received

    A complete discussion of all issues raised in this review are 
addressed in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is 
hereby adopted by this notice. See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for 
the Final Results in the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping 
Duty Order on Folding Gift Boxes from the People's Republic of China,'' 
from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary, to David M. 
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, dated March 29, 
2007 (``I&D Memo''). The issues discussed in the accompanying I&D Memo 
include the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the 
magnitude of the dumping margin likely to prevail if the Order were 
revoked. Parties can obtain a public copy of the I&D Memo on file in 
the Central Records

[[Page 16766]]

Unit, room B-099, of the main Commerce building. In addition, a 
complete public version of the I&D Memo can be accessed directly on the 
Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov and clicking on ``Federal Register 

Notices.'' The paper copy and electronic version of the I&D Memo are 
identical in content.

Final Results Of Sunset Review

    The Department determines that revocation of the Order on folding 
gift boxes from the PRC would likely lead to continuation or recurrence 
of dumping at the rates listed below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Weighted-Average
          Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers            Margin (Percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Red Point Paper Products Co., Ltd...................       8.90 [percnt]
Max Fortune Industrial Ltd..........................   1.67 [percnt] (de
                                                                minimis)
PRC-wide rate.......................................     164.75 [percnt]
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective order (``APO'') of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 C.F.R. 351.305. Timely 
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or 
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to 
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is 
subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these results and notice in 
accordance with sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-6404 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S