Performance Track Logo
OMB No. 2010-0032
Expiration Date 01/31/2010
2007 Performance Track Annual Performance Report

















Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP
A040127
Year 3 Annual Performance Report
Member Since 2005 (1st Member Term)



























SECTION A: GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION


Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP

 
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation

  Mr. Calvin Overcash
  Plant Environmental Manager, Wilmington EWP
  910.762.9878
  910.763.8178
  Calvin.Overcash@LPCorp.com


2706 US Highway 421 North
Wilmington
NC
28401


http://www.lpcorp.com

100-499

321213


This facility manufactures Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) of various thicknesses by layering sheets of veneer with resin and bonding those materials under heat and pressure. The resulting materials are then sawn into various lengths.

LP Wilmington is located approximately 2 miles north of the City of Wilmington, North Carolina on U.S. Highway 421 North. The site is generally rectangular with the long axis oriented east-to-west, and is located in an industrial corridor primarily surrounded by industrial property with widely scattered residential dwellings. The east boundary of the site is the Northeast Cape Fear River, the west boundary is US highway 421 North, and the north and south boundaries are industrial sites. The property is in a non-wooded sandy area with minimal topographic relief. Access to the property is directly off U.S. Highway 421 North. The facility consists of 14 acres on which the production buildings are located, 10 acres of outside storage where finished, wrapped product is stored prior to shipping, and 7.5 acres of property immediately adjacent to the mill that is leased, also for outside product storage. The mill currently has 165 employees and operates 24 hours per day, 5 days per week.

No



SECTION B: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM


No

No


November 2007
PT Independent Assessment Protocol
Specify:
Name: Marilyn Rash, CPEA
Title: Compliance Systems Audit Manager
Organization: Louisiana-Pacific
Policy, Planning, Implementation, Checking, Management
Entire Facility



Yes

December 2007
Policy, Planning, Implementation, Checking, Management
Entire Facility



Yes

January 2007
Clean Air Act (CAA)
Clean Water Act (CWA)
Emergency Planning & Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA)
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)





NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources conducted annual inspections during each of the previous three years to determine compliance with our Air Permit.


Yes


Yes

Mr.  James Waddell
  Plant Manager


December 2007



SECTION C: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS



Goal 1: Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP's first goal is to improve the management of the facility's non-hazardous waste.

The data in this goal reflect all non-hazardous waste and recyclable material generated across the entire faciltiy. The facility continued efforts to reduce all solid waste including non-hazardous wste and recyclable materials. We continued recycling efforts by continuing to recycle wood waste and aluminum cans instead of sending it to solid waste. In addition efforts continued to reduce solid waste generation by improving production yield, and segregating recyclable materials. Alos, wood waste recycling and landfilled solid waste decreased as a result of improved yield. By producing product more efficiently, less wood waste and less landfill material were generated. Although the facility significantly reduced total non-hazardous waste managed, due to a significant reduction in production as a result of a poor market for products, the normalization of waste reduction to production makes these reductions appear less significant.

The facility continued recycling efforts by recycling wood waste and aluminum cans instead of sending it to solid waste. In addition efforts continued to reduce solid waste generation by improving production yield. Wood waste recycling decreased as a result of improved yield. By producing product more efficiently, less wood waste and less landfill material were generated. Material sent to the landfill increased as a result of conducting several capital improvement projects during the reporting period.
The facility continued recycling efforts by recycling wood waste and aluminum cans instead of sending it to solid waste. In addition efforts continued to reduce solid waste generation by improving production yield. Wood waste recycling and landfilling both decreased as a result of improved yield. By producing product more efficiently, less wood waste and less landfill material were generated. Metal recycling decreased because we switched from using primarily metal banding to primarily plastic banding.

All waste and recycled materials are weighed for the purpose of calculating payments due or payments received. These data are collected and reported monthly.

2004
2005
2006
2007
Landfill 740 386 418 308 Tons
Reused/recycled off-site 705 565 540 518 Tons

Total Non Hazardous Waste 1,445.00 951.00 958.00 826.00 n/a Tons


Normalizing Factor 1.0 0.92 .72 0.67
Total Non Hazardous Waste 1,445.00 1,033.70 1,330.56 1,232.84 1,445.00 Tons

Tons of I-joists and LVL produced.




Goal 2: Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP's second goal is to reduce the facility's total water use.

The primary result of this goal was to eliminate a particular water use. This was accomplished in the first year of this Performance Track membership term. We use only very small amounts of water in our production process for cleaning purposes. Our primary water use is for domestic type use and fire fighting. We have been unable to identify any other areas where we can reduce our water consumption however, we have been steadily reducing our overall water use. This is most likely a result of reducing our number of employees due to efficiencies gained in the manufacturing process and to a significant reduction in production as a result of a poor market for products.

Normalized water use was reduced as compared to 2005. However, no further activities have been identified that will result in a reduced water usage at the facility. We will continue to explore opportunities.
A Quality Assurance procedure that used the potable water supply to pull a vacuum was modified. The water supply mechanism was replaced with a pneumatic pump to pull the vacuum, thus eliminating the water use. Water use eliminated during 2005 was 4,750 gallons. This specific elimination of water use accounts for the water use reduction committment. However, as can be seen, overall water use at the facility increased in spite of eliminating this specific water use. Water use will be further investigated and additional methods to reduce water use will be explored.

The local water utility reads the water meters monthly and invoices us for the amount of water used. We report water use directly from the invoice. Although it appears that the water utility rounds the usage number the nearest thousand gallons, this is the most accurate number we have to report. All water is assumed used since we have no recycling water (almost all water is used for domestic purposes and is disposed via a septic system and associated leach field).

 
 
2004
2005
2006
2007
Actual Quantity (per year) 1,143,000 1,223,000 913,000 750,000 n/a Gallons

Normalizing Factor 1.0 .92 .73 0.67
Normalized Quantity 1,143,000 1,329,347.83 1,250,684.93 1,119,402.99 1,127,000 Gallons

Tons of I-joists and LVL produced.







Goal 3: Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP's third goal is to reduce the facility's total (non-transportation) energy use.

As discussed in our 2006 Performance Track Annual Report, a great deal of work was completed on our compresssed air system, and on our sawdust collection and conveyance system in late 2006 to make them more efficient. In 2007 we observed a significant reduction in electricity consumption. Again, due to significantly lower production the normalized reduction does not appear as significant. Our original goal was to reduce electricity use by 5%. We achieved an absolute electricity reduction of over 17%. Therefore, although we did not meet the Performance Track goal of overall energy use reduction, we far exceded our electricity use reduction goal.

During 2006 a compressed air audit was conducted and the compressed air system was reconfigured and updated, based on the results of the audit, for the purpose of energy savings. Also in 2006 the sawdust collection, conveyance, and control system was reconfigured to allow for more economical operation thus saving energy costs. Both of the projects were completed toward the end of 2006. Therefore the energy use reduction will not be evident until the CY 2007 report.
No specific activities were implemented in 2005. Activities are planned for 2006 - 2007 including having an external energy use audit conducted at the facility to determine areas or activities within the mill where energy savings can be obtained and then implementing the appropriate measures to obtain the energy use reduction. .

NOTE: Natural gas usage for baseline 2004 was incorrectly reported as 53.4 MMBtu (decimal error). The actual usage was 53,374 MMBtu. This incorrect data was reported to the PTrack Information Center and the correction was made on April 26, 2006.

The data for all types of energy used at the facility are collected on a monthly basis from use or delivery invoices, and recorded. For electricity, the local electric utility reads the electric meters monthly and invoices us for the amount of electricity used. We report electricity use directly from the invoice. Although it appears that the electric utility rounds the usage number the nearest 50 kWh, this is the most accurate number we have to report.


17,530,500 16,999,900 16,450,150 14,500,500 Kwh
59,814.07 58,003.66 56,127.91 49,475.71 MMBtus

SERC Virginia/Carolina


EPA will be determining the greenhouse gases associated with the generation of the steam that you purchase. We will be contacting you for additional information regarding the source of the steam generated.
59,814.07 58,003.66 56,127.91 49,475.71

53,374 51,740 47,111 48,740 MMBtus
53,374.00 51,740.00 47,111.00 48,740.00

2,213.12 2,146.14 2,076.73 1,830.60 n/a
110,974.95 107,597.52 101,162.18 96,385.10 n/a
113,188.07 109,743.66 103,238.91 98,215.71 n/a
11,939.55 11,577.19 11,046.43 10,118.79 n/a
11,939.55 11,577.19 11,046.43 10,118.79 n/a


1.0 .92 .72 0.67
113,188.07 119,286.59 143,387.38 146,590.61 107,206.66 MMBtus
11,939.55 12,583.90 15,342.26 15,102.67 11,027.96 MTCO2E

Tons of I-joists and LVL produced.





Goal 4: Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP's fourth goal is to reduce the facility's materials use.

This goal is reporitng on only wrapping paper used at this facility. We have continued to work with the operations folks at our mill to reduce the number of sizes of wrapping paper, thus the overall quantity of plastic tube cores that are delivered to the mill. We explored the possibility of returning the plastic cores to the wrapping paper vendor for re-use, but they will not accept them back. We have continued to search for a recycler that can take this material. To date we have not identified such a recycler, but are still continuing to explore this option. We have tried to identify a secondary use of these plastic cores but have not yet found such an option, however we are also continuing to explore this option. Until we are able to locate another avenue for disposal of this material all of the material received becomes solid waste.

A change was made to our corporate logo during this reporting period. This change required us to order all new wrapping paper with the new logo, resulting in an increased amount of waste. We believe this will decrease in the next reporting period. In addition, we are still searching for recycle opportunities for this material.
We modified our packaging procedure to add more product per bundle. This eliminated 8 of the 16 different widths of wrapping paper, so we did not have to order and stock as much wrapping paper. It also allowed us to use less wrapping paper for the same total amount of product shipped.

The supplier of our wrapping paper provides a summary of total wrapping paper, by size, that our facility received in 2007. The information is provided as linear feet of wrapping paper of each different size that we used. Based on the known number of linear feet per core we calculate the number of cores of each size that we received during the year. We have measured the cores to determine the weight per linear inch of a core. With this data we calculate the total weight of cores received at the mill during the year.

 
 
2004
2005
2006
2007
Actual Quantity (per year) 15 9.24 10.25 7.84 n/a Tons

Normalizing Factor 1.0 .92 .72 0.67
Normalized Quantity 15 10.04 14.24 11.70 8 Tons

Tons of I-joists and LVL produced.








In the table below, please provide a narrative summary of progress made toward EMS objectives and targets other than those reported as Environmental Performance Goals. You may limit the summary to environmental aspects that are significant and towards which progress has been made during the reporting year.

Do you have additional environmental aspects to report?   No







SECTION D: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND PERFORMANCE REPORTING


Most of the employees at our facility live in the surrounding community. If there is a community concern the employees typically bring that concern to the attention of Facility Management. In addition, we are physically very visible, as we are located on a major highway in a large building with our name and logo prominently displayed. We occasionally get calls from surrounding neighbors with environmental or health and safety questions, which we address in person or via a phone call.

One concern regarding excessive noise was raised during the past year from a local resident. The Plant Environmental Manager contacted this individual to obtain the details. This complaint lead mill personnel to discover a piece of equipment that was malfunctioning and creating the excessive noise. The equipment was repaired and the excessive noise eliminated. The Plant Environmental Manager followed up with the individual that had raised the issue, who said the noise was eliminated and there were no further issues with the facility.

We informed the public about environmental matters related to our faility by personal telephone calls when appropriate; by training and informing the employees at the facility, who are also members of the community, regarding environmental matters; and by submitting the required EPCRA Tier 2 and Tier 3 reports. We do not have a commuity action committee, and do not voluntarily contact members of the surrounding community, since we are in an industrial corridor, not a residential area.

Web Site
URL: http://lpcorp.com








OMB No. 2010-0032

SECTION E: SELF-CERTIFICATION OF CONTINUED PROGRAM PARTICIPATION FOR ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT


The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is not yet in a position to accept electronic signatures and therefore requests a faxed, signed copy of the Section E page. Please complete Section E online, then print Section E using the link on the Overview page. Section E should be signed by the senior manager of your facility and faxed it to the Performance Track Information Center at (617) 354-0463.

On behalf of Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP, I certify that:

  • I have read and agree to the terms and conditions as specified in the National Enviromental Performance Track Program Guide. This facility, to the best of my knowledge, continues to meet all program criteria;

  • I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this Annual Performance Report. The information contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, true, accurate, and complete;

  • My facility has an environmental management system (EMS), as defined in the Performance Track EMS criteria, including systems to maintain compliance with all applicable federal, state, tribal, and local environmental requirements, in place at the facility, and the EMS will be maintained for the duration of the facility's participation in the program;

  • My facility has conducted an objective assessment of its compliance with all applicable federal, state, tribal, and local environmental requirements; and the facility has corrected all identified instances of potential or actual noncompliance; and

  • Based on the foregoing compliance assessments and subsequent corrective actions (if any were necessary), my facility is, to the best of my knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, currently in compliance with applicable federal, state, tribal, and local environmental requirements.

I agree that EPA's decision whether to accept participants into or remove them from the National Environment Performance Track is wholly discretionary, and I waive any right that may exist under any law to challenge EPA's acceptance or removal decision. I am the senior manager with responsibility for the facility and am fully authorized to execute this statement on behalf of the corporation or other legal entity whose facility is part of the National Environmental Performance Track program.

______________________________________________________
Mr. James Waddell
Plant Manager
Louisiana-Pacific, Wilmington EWP
2706 US Highway 421 North
Wilmington, NC 28401

,
A040127