OMB No. 2010-0032

Performance Track Membership Renewal Application 2004 Advanced Sterilization Products A090005

Your greenhouse gas emissions commitment may be to reduce energy use, to reduce process-related emissions, or a combination of both. In the table below, for each source of emissions, please enter the level of emissions and the level you intend to emit in 2006. You may also use the optional text box to the right to describe your proposed commitment.
4a	Please provide information for these calendar years.	Baseline: 2003	Future: 2006
4b   Emission Source		How much greenhouse gas does your facility emit from each source?
		Baseline	Future	Units
Direct Emissions
Stationary Combustion		90	90	MTCO2E
Mobile Sources				MTCO2E
Refrigeration/AC Equipment Use				MTCO2E
Process/Fugitive (specify source):				MTCO2E
Process/Fugitive (specify source):				MTCO2E
Process/Fugitive (specify source):				MTCO2E
Total Direct Emissions		90.00	90.00	MTCO2E
Indirect Emissions
Purchased Electricity		1,149	1,149	MTCO2E
Purchased Steam				MTCO2E
Purchased Hot Water				MTCO2E
Total Indirect Emissions		1,149.00	1,149.00	MTCO2E
Optional Indirect Emissions
Other (specify):				MTCO2E
Other (specify):				MTCO2E
Other (specify):				MTCO2E
Total Optional Indirect Emissions		0.00	0.00	MTCO2E
Offsets
Other (specify): Purchase of Green Tags		782	1,259	MTCO2E
Other (specify):				MTCO2E
Other (specify):				MTCO2E
Total Reduction from Offsets		782.00	1,259.00	MTCO2E
Total Emissions Less Offsets		457.00	-20.00	MTCO2E
Supplemental Information
Total CFC				MTCO2E
Total HCFC				MTCO2E
Total Stationary Combustion - Biomass CO2				MTCO2E
Total Mobile Sources - Biomass CO2				MTCO2E
Electricity trading transactions / Electricity Purchase for Resale				kWh

5	Does the quantity presented in the future quantity column represent an actual goal or a normalized goal?	Normalized goal (i.e. indexed to level of business in baseline year)
6	Whether your goal is actual or normalized, in your annual performance reports you will need to provide normalizing factors and normalized quantities of your annual data. (This provides information on changes in eco-efficiency at your facility). Your environmental performance for this commitment should be normalized based on the facility’s productive output or, where necessary, on a substitute for production. Please briefly describe your intended basis for normalizing, e.g., gallons of chemical product produced; dollars of sales adjusted for inflation and weighted based on percentage of waste stream produced; number of households served.	# of Employees 2003 =321
7a	Are you subject to Federal, State, Tribal, or local regulatory requirements for this indicator?	No
7b	If yes, please list those requirements, including the quantitative limits and compliance deadlines that apply to you. Explain how your commitment exceeds requirements.

Commitment 2

1a	What category have you selected from the Environmental Performance Table?	Waste
1b	What indicator have you selected from the Environmental Performance Table?	Non-Hazardous Waste Generation
1c	Does your commitment include everything covered by the indicator (e.g., all VOCs, all non-hazardous waste), or a specific substance or component (e.g., ethane, cardboard)? All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc.	All
	If your commitment is to a specific substance or component, please provide additional detail on your indicator (e.g., specific chemical to be reduced, specific waste component).
1d	What activities or process changes do you plan to undertake at your facility to accomplish your commitment (e.g., technology changes in a particular process line, employee training)?	Increase % of Waste to Recycle/Reuse Decrease % of Waste to Landfill Increase amount of paper and cardboard that is being recycled by education programs and a redesign of the baling process.
2	Are you proposing this as a regional challenge commitment? (Regions 1, 2 and 6 only)	No
3a	Is this indicator considered significant in your EMS?	Yes
3b	If no, please explain why you believe this indicator should be included as a performance commitment.

In the table below, please enter your facility's amount of non-hazardous waste, broken down by waste management method. Please enter both the amounts that you manage currently and that you intend to manage in 2006. "Waste" is defined as all materials that are sent off-site that are neither product nor product packaging.

Is the goal of your non-hazardous waste commitment to reduce non-hazardous waste, to improve methods of waste management, or a combination of both?		Improve Waste Management Methods
4a	Please provide information for these calendar years.	Baseline: 2003	Future: 2006
4b	Method of Waste Management	How much of your waste is handled using each management method?
		Baseline	Future	Units
Landfill		99,208.02	80556.92	Pounds
Reused/recycled off-site		211,643.8	230,294.9	Pounds
Total Non-Hazardous Solid Waste		155.43	155.43	Tons

5	Does the quantity presented in the future quantity column represent an actual goal or a normalized goal?	Actual goal
6	Whether your goal is actual or normalized, in your annual performance reports you will need to provide normalizing factors and normalized quantities of your annual data. (This provides information on changes in eco-efficiency at your facility). Your environmental performance for this commitment should be normalized based on the facility’s productive output or, where necessary, on a substitute for production. Please briefly describe your intended basis for normalizing, e.g., gallons of chemical product produced; dollars of sales adjusted for inflation and weighted based on percentage of waste stream produced; number of households served.	# of employees 2003 = 321
7a	Are you subject to Federal, State, Tribal, or local regulatory requirements for this indicator?	No
7b	If yes, please list those requirements, including the quantitative limits and compliance deadlines that apply to you. Explain how your commitment exceeds requirements.

Commitment 3

1a	What category have you selected from the Environmental Performance Table?	Material Use
1b	What indicator have you selected from the Environmental Performance Table?	Total Packaging Materials Use
1c	Does your commitment include everything covered by the indicator (e.g., all VOCs, all non-hazardous waste), or a specific substance or component (e.g., ethane, cardboard)? All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc.	All
1d	What activities or process changes do you plan to undertake at your facility to accomplish your commitment (e.g., technology changes in a particular process line, employee training)?	Reduction in Packaging Materials Use - Implement the use of reusable totes.
2	Are you proposing this as a regional challenge commitment? (Regions 1, 2 and 6 only)	No
3a	Is this indicator considered significant in your EMS?	Yes
3b	If no, please explain why you believe this indicator should be included as a performance commitment.

		Baseline	Future
4a	Please provide information for these calendar years.	2003	2006
4b	What units are you using to quantify this indicator?	Pounds
4c	List the baseline annual quantity of the indicator and the annual quantity you are commited to achieve by the future year. Future commitments should not reflect projected changes in production.	400,183	384,176

5	Does the quantity presented in the future quantity column represent an actual goal or a normalized goal?	Normalized goal (i.e. indexed to level of business in baseline year)
6	Whether your goal is actual or normalized, in your annual performance reports you will need to provide normalizing factors and normalized quantities of your annual data. (This provides information on changes in eco-efficiency at your facility). Your environmental performance for this commitment should be normalized based on the facility’s productive output or, where necessary, on a substitute for production. Please briefly describe your intended basis for normalizing, e.g., gallons of chemical product produced; dollars of sales adjusted for inflation and weighted based on percentage of waste stream produced; number of households served.	Annual $ sales of sterilization machinery, related consumables, and disinfectants, adjusted for inflation
7a	Are you subject to Federal, State, Tribal, or local regulatory requirements for this indicator?	No
7b	If yes, please list those requirements, including the quantitative limits and compliance deadlines that apply to you. Explain how your commitment exceeds requirements.

Commitment 4

1a	What category have you selected from the Environmental Performance Table?	Water Use
1b	What indicator have you selected from the Environmental Performance Table?	Total Water Use
1c	Does your commitment include everything covered by the indicator (e.g., all VOCs, all non-hazardous waste), or a specific substance or component (e.g., ethane, cardboard)? All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc.	All
1d	What activities or process changes do you plan to undertake at your facility to accomplish your commitment (e.g., technology changes in a particular process line, employee training)?	Water Conservation education; reevaluation of J&J Water Enhanced Best Practices
2	Are you proposing this as a regional challenge commitment? (Regions 1, 2 and 6 only)	No
3a	Is this indicator considered significant in your EMS?	Yes
3b	If no, please explain why you believe this indicator should be included as a performance commitment.

		Baseline	Future
4a	Please provide information for these calendar years.	2003	2006
4b	What units are you using to quantify this indicator?	Gallons
4c	List the baseline annual quantity of the indicator and the annual quantity you are commited to achieve by the future year. Future commitments should not reflect projected changes in production.	1,536,908	1,475,431

5	Does the quantity presented in the future quantity column represent an actual goal or a normalized goal?	Normalized goal (i.e. indexed to level of business in baseline year)
6	Whether your goal is actual or normalized, in your annual performance reports you will need to provide normalizing factors and normalized quantities of your annual data. (This provides information on changes in eco-efficiency at your facility). Your environmental performance for this commitment should be normalized based on the facility’s productive output or, where necessary, on a substitute for production. Please briefly describe your intended basis for normalizing, e.g., gallons of chemical product produced; dollars of sales adjusted for inflation and weighted based on percentage of waste stream produced; number of households served.	# of Employees 2003=321
7a	Are you subject to Federal, State, Tribal, or local regulatory requirements for this indicator?	No
7b	If yes, please list those requirements, including the quantitative limits and compliance deadlines that apply to you. Explain how your commitment exceeds requirements.

Attachments (if applicable) :

Section E: Self-Certification of Continued Program Participation On behalf of Advanced Sterilization Products, I certify that: I have read and agree to the terms and conditions for Membership Renewal and Participation in the National Environmental Performance Track, as specified in the National Environmental Performance Track Program Guide and in the Renewal Application Instructions; I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in this Renewal Application. The information contained in this Renewal Application is, to the best of my knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, true, accurate, and complete, and I have no reason to believe the facility would not meet all program requirements; My facility has an environmental management system (EMS), as defined in the Performance Track EMS requirements, including systems to maintain compliance with all applicable Federal, State, tribal, and local environmental requirements in place at the facility, and the EMS will be maintained for the duration of the facility's participation in the program My facility has conducted an objective assessment of its compliance with all Federal, State, tribal, and local environmental requirements, and the facility has corrected all identified instances of potential or actual noncompliance; Based on the foregoing compliance assessment and subsequent corrective actions (if any were necessary), my facility is, to the best of my knowledge and based on reasonable inquiry, currently in compliance with applicable Federal, State, tribal, and local environmental requirements. I agree that EPA's decision whether to accept participants into or remove them from the National Environmental Performance Track is wholly discretionary, and I waive any right that may exist under any law to challenge EPA's acceptance or removal decision. I am the senior facility manager and fully authorized to execute this statement on behalf of the corporation or other legal entity whose facility is applying to this program.

Signature/Date:	______________________________________________________
Name:	Mrs.  Karen Barnes
Title:	VP Operations, EMS Mgmt Representative
Phone Number:	949-581-5799
E-Mail Address:	kbarnes@aspus.jnj.com
Facility Name:	Advanced Sterilization Products
Facility Street Address:	33 Technology Drive Irvine, CA 92618
Mailing Address:	33 Technology Drive
Address cont:
City, State Zip:	Irvine, CA92618
Member ID#:	A090005