Statement of Michael S. Sade

Procurement Executive and Director for Acquisition Management

U.S. Department of Commerce

Before the

Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations,

House Committee on Energy and Commerce

May 1, 2002 - 10:00 a.m.

 

Good morning Mr. Chairman, Congressman Deutsch, and members of the subcommittee.  My name is Mike Sade and I serve as the Procurement Executive for the Department of Commerce.  I appreciate the opportunity to appear before you today to discuss the implementation of acquisition reform initiatives at Commerce, oversight of and improvements to the Purchase Card Program, and the important benefits that result of the purchase card program.

 

Typically, the Department buys over $1 billion in goods and services needed to support its diverse and geographically dispersed program operations.  The majority of these funds are spent through traditional procurement mechanisms rather than purchase cards.  Out of the $1.2 billion that was spent in FY 2001, $1.1 billion – or 89 percent of the total – was awarded through contracts or purchase orders. 

 

Acquisition Reform at Commerce

 

The Purchase Card Program is one of many acquisition reforms being used to improve the timeliness and quality of the goods and services used to help Commerce carry out its mission of promoting job creation and improved living standards for all Americans by creating an infrastructure that promotes economic growth, technological competitiveness, and sustainable development.  In addition to the Purchase Card Program, reforms being implemented at Commerce include:  expanded use of task order contracts, enhanced market research prior to determining acquisition strategies, improved planning for contract administration and monitoring, and expanded use of performance-based service contracting.

 

While we are actively working to implement the innovative tools that are available to simplify and streamline the procurement process, we recognize the need for maintaining proper controls and accountability in carrying out all aspects of acquisition reform.  The importance of this effort has been highlighted by our Inspector General, who has identified the implementation of acquisition reform initiatives as one of the top ten management challenges facing the Department. 

 

To address this challenge, we have adopted a comprehensive approach for managing and minimizing the risks involved in carrying out acquisition reform.

 

          We have adopted a balanced scorecard approach to establishing goals for and measuring performance of procurement offices throughout the Department, and incorporated acquisition planning into the budget process.

          We are providing needed tools and training to front line employees to educate them about and equip them to comply with new procedural requirements. 

          Additionally, we are conducting focused program reviews on the use of new procurement methods, and developing control levers for large dollar or riskier acquisitions. 

 

We have completed or are working on focused program reviews in the areas of:

 

             Acquisition Workforce Assessment - Complete

             Government-Wide Acquisition Contract (GWAC) and Other Agency Contract Review – Draft Report Prepared

             Appropriate Delegation of Acquisition Authority – Proposal Under Development

             Interagency Agreements/MOUs - Underway

             Contracting Officers Technical Representative (COTR) Program - Targeted for September 2002

             Purchase Card Use and Compliance - Ongoing with Office of Inspector General (OIG)

 

Purchase Card Program

 

Commerce is proud to have served in the government’s pilot purchase card program initiated in 1986.  The goals of the pilot were the same as the program that we are currently implementing:  (1) improve mission support, (2) streamline the placement of micro-purchases, and (3) reduce administrative costs and paperwork while ensuring adherence to federal acquisition regulations. 

 

Because of the increased savings and efficiencies achieved during the pilot program, use of the purchase card was greatly expanded in 1988 when the General Services Administration established the first government-wide Commercial Purchase Card Program.  Five banks provide card services to the government under the current master contracts, which were awarded by GSA in 1998.  Citibank provides card services to the Department of Commerce through a five-year task order that was issued in November 1998.

 

The Department presently has over 6,000 card holders.  The cardholder-to-approving officials ratio for FY 2001 and FY 2002 is 4:1.  In FY 2001, the cost avoidance or cost savings through the use of Purchase Cards was $22,000,000.

 

Recognizing that the flexibilities offered by such a program also pose potential risks, the Department has continuously taken steps to:  identify opportunities to strengthen oversight and management of the Purchase Card Program, and implement appropriate corrective action. 

 

The approach taken in managing this program is a direct outgrowth of our risk management strategy.  Oversight of the DOC Purchase Card Program is a direct result of our overall Risk Management Approach.  Multiple control levers are in place that assist with the day-to-day management of the program and help to identify weaknesses.  These include Department-wide policies; centralized management and reporting; bureau-specific policies, procedures and reviews; regularly scheduled transaction reviews; and systematic reconciliation procedures.

 

·        Specifically, the Office of Acquisition Management has, for many years, had an established Department-wide policy for the Purchase Card Program.   The Commerce Acquisition Manual clearly establishes the roles and responsibilities of program participants as well as procedures and guidance for program use.  This policy document was entirely rewritten in 1999, and was again updated as recently as February of this year.  I will discuss the specifics of this update later in my testimony. 

 

·        The Commerce Bankcard Center, established in 1987, is primarily responsible for centralized maintenance of Department-wide data and reporting as well as other program support functions. 

 

·        The Head of the Contracting Office for each bureau, including the Office of the Secretary, is responsible for management and day-to-day oversight of the Program within their respective unit.  They are assisted by individuals who have been designated as the Agency Program Coordinators for their organizations.  Responsibilities include developing bureau-specific procedures, managing the program, maintaining proper security, ensuring account reconciliation, conducting scheduled documentation reviews, and establishing accounts with the contractor.

 

·        Regularly scheduled transaction reviews are performed at several levels and include the Commerce Bankcard Center, bureau Agency Program Coordinators, and approving officials. 

 

At the highest level, the Commerce Bankcard Center performs a daily review of questionable Standard Industrial Code transactions.  Our service provider, Citibank, provides a daily transaction file to the Commerce Bankcard Center, which it screens for questionable transactions such as those involving airlines, hotels, car rental agencies, gas stations, restaurants, jewelry stores, clothing stores, catalog merchants, health service providers, and religious and political organizations.  Any questionable transactions are brought to the attention of the Head of Contracting Office for investigation. 

 

In addition, each bureau has established procedures for scheduled transaction reviews by the Agency Program Coordinator, who relies on transaction data provided by the Commerce Bankcard Center and reports provided by Citibank.  The ad hoc reporting capability of Citibank’s electronic card management system, Citidirect, is also utilized to review transactions. 

 

·        This brings us to the reconciliation process used by cardholders and approving officials to review and certify individual transactions on a monthly basis at the grass roots level.  The general procedure requires that all cardholders maintain a purchase card log (either electronic or manual).  Upon receipt of the monthly statement, the cardholder reviews all information included in the statement for accuracy and compares it with the log.  Cardholders are required to describe each transaction on the statement, indicate the appropriate object class and accounting code, dispute any unrecognizable or incorrect transactions, and certify the statement for payment. 

 

The cardholder provides the statement, along with supporting documentation, to the approving official for review and approval.  Upon receipt the approving official reviews the statement, comparing it to the Detailed Account Cycle Report that they have received from Citibank.  It is the approving official’s responsibility to resolve any outstanding issues, verify the appropriateness of the transactions, and certify each statement for payment.  All original documentation is returned to the cardholder for retention in accordance with the Commerce Acquisition Manual, and the approved certified statement is forwarded to the payment office for payment.  Although the general reconciliation procedures are the same across the Department, specific methods may vary since some bureaus perform the function manually and others electronically.

 

·        Finally, it should be noted that – as part of its system of checks and balances -- the Department is moving to an all-electronic reconciliation process through implementation of the Commerce Administrative Management System or CAMS -- the Department’s core financial system.  CAMS includes several functional administrative systems that provide additional operational capabilities.  One of these is the Commerce Purchase Card System (CPCS), which provides a reconciliation and payment function for purchase cards.  Currently, two of our bureaus – Census and NOAA – have implemented CPCS.  Once CAMS implementation is completed, however, CPCS will be used Department-wide.  

 

Use of CAMS, and specifically CPCS, adds several safeguards over a manual reconciliation process:

 

-  It requires and verifies that all users (cardholders and approving officials) are current active employees within the Department.

-  System constraints will not allow a cardholder to be their own approving official.

-  Transactions cannot be edited or deleted from CPCS.  The transaction data, as received from the bank, remains intact within CPCS.

-  CPCS ensures that transactions are entered in and matched to the order log,  reconciled by the card holder, and reviewed and approved by the approving official.

-  CPCS requires that proper accounting codes are applied to all transactions as part of the reconciliation process.

-  Additionally, CPCS generates reports identifying all transactions that have not been reconciled and approved in a timely manner. 

 

Risk management is a vital component of the DOC Purchase Card Program and on-going oversight is a priority.  Six cases of abuse, during the period of 1997 – 2001, have been identified.  The total dollar value of the six cases identified totaled $64,278, or .0116% of the total Purchase Card Sales of $555,590,940 from 1997 to 2001.   In each identified case of abuse, the individual was prosecuted to the full extent of the law, terminated or resigned, and full restitution was made to the government.

                                                                       

Continuous program improvement has been the key to success for the Purchase Card Program at Commerce.  We will continue to work – both with the Inspector General and independently – to address areas needing improvement, implement corrective actions, and identify opportunities to enhance the oversight and management of DOC’s Purchase Card Program.  We are focusing on three major areas:  improving cardholder performance, updating approving official procedures, and strengthening the control of accountable property purchased under the program.

 

We have taken action to strengthen the Purchase Card Program on several fronts.

 

·        In June 2001, we conducted a conference specifically focused on the use of purchase, travel, and fleet cards.  During the conference, several program issues were identified and possible solutions discussed.  These include:

 

-  Improving oversight by implementing a Department-wide risk management initiative,

-  Continuing to improve cardholder and approving official performance by clarifying their roles and responsibilities in the Commerce Acquisition Manual,

-  Improving controls over accountable property acquired with the Purchase Card,

-  Clarifying the responsibilities of approving officials within their designation, and

-  Recommending annual review of cardholders and credit limits

 

·        As mentioned earlier, we revised the Commerce Acquisition Manual this past  February to improve cardholder and approving official training standards,  requiring all cardholders and approving officials to complete GSA’s web-based training prior to participating in the program.   In cases where authority will exceed the $2,500 micro-purchase threshold, cardholders and approving officials must also complete a 40-hour course on simplified acquisition procedures.  Additionally, refresher training consists of completing a minimum of 24 hours in the area of simplified acquisition once every five years. 

 

·        The Department is currently in the process of revising its Contracting Officer Warrant Program to require warrants, based on training, education, and experience, for all purchase card holders with authority over the $2,500 threshold.

 

·        The Risk Management approach to the Purchase Card program has recently been further implemented when two procurement offices within the Department, including NOAA, the Department’s largest program participant, realigned to include Purchase Card Oversight Teams that are dedicated to management, oversight, and identifying areas of improvement and solutions.

 

We believe that these actions have and will continue to help us in maintaining the integrity of this important program.  We recognize, however, that there are always areas in which improvement is possible.  These challenges include:

 

·        Replacing multiple financial systems and implementing CPCS Department-wide – The Department is moving forward to implement a single financial system which will play a significant role in reconciliation,

·        Ensuring continued compliance with established policy and procedures; and

·        Controlling accountable property within the Department.

 

Conclusion

 

The Purchase Card Program has played a key role in the implementation of Department of Commerce Acquisition Reform Initiatives.  It streamlines the procurement process and empowers the buyer to fulfill low cost program needs in a timely and efficient manner, thereby, supporting the overall mission of the Department.  Key benefits from this program include the procurement cost avoided.  It is estimated that – in FY 2001 alone – the use of the purchase card saved the Department of Commerce approximately $22 million.  Primarily through the use of the purchase card, the cost to spend ratio or cost of procurement operations cost to spend one dollar for the Department of Commerce has gone from $.03 in 1997 to just over $.01 in 2001.

 

That having been said, we believe that these benefits must be balanced by responsible and prudent use of the purchase card.  I hope that my description of the oversight mechanisms and management controls that are now in place, and the steps that are being taken to strengthen our program is helpful in understanding how we are working to achieve this balance.   We look forward to continuing to work with the Inspector General to implement any recommendations that might result from the review that is now underway. 

 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for the opportunity to testify before the subcommittee.  I would be glad to answer any questions at this time.