Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov

Appendix F: NHQR Quality Measures for All Conditions by State

This appendix lists quality measures for all conditions and topics in the NHQR. It includes the national estimate and then an indicator for whether or not the State estimate (not shown due to space limitation) is statistically greater, lower, or no different from the national average. The measures for which State-level data are not reported in the NHQR are noted as not available (n/a). This resource can help States identify which diseases and treatments, including and outside of diabetes, may be in need of attention. Many of the same data issues described in Module 2: Data and Module 3: Information are applicable to other disease topics, although different data sources and limitations may apply to them.

Contents

Table F.1. NHQR quality measures for all conditions when available by State, alphabetically Alabama through Missouri
Table F.2. NHQR quality measures for all conditions when available by State, alphabetically Montana through Wyoming

Table F.1. NHQR quality measures for all conditions when available by State, alphabetically Alabama through Missouri

Part 1 - Alabama-Florida

National Healthcare Quality Report (2003) Measures, National Estimate, and State Significance Test (Sig.)a for Difference from the National Average

Measure Title Year Metric U.S. Est. AL Sig. AK Sig. AZ Sig. AR Sig. CA Sig. CO Sig. CT Sig. DE Sig. DC Sig. FL Sig. Source NHQR Table
1. Effectiveness of Care
Cancer
Screening for breast cancer
Process: Percent of women (age 40 and over) who report they had a mammogram within the past 2 years 2001 Percent 76.00 n/a n/a ns - n/a ns n/a n/a n/a n/a BRFSS 1.1b
2000 Percent 76.70 ns ns + - ns ns + + + ns BRFSS 1.1c
Screening for cervical cancer:
Process: Percent of women (age 18 and over) who report that they had a Pap smear within the past 3 years 2001 Percent 84.80 n/a n/a ns - n/a ns n/a n/a n/a n/a BRFSS 1.3b
2000 Percent 83.70 ns + ns - ns ns + + + ns BRFSS 1.3c
Screening for colorectal cancer:
Process: Percent of men and women (age 50 and over) who report they ever had a flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy 2001 Percent 47.60 ns ns ns - ns ns + + + ns BRFSS 1.5b
Process: Percent of men and women (age 50 and over) who report they had a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within the past 2 years 2001 Percent 35.30 - - ns - ns ns + - + + BRFSS 1.6b
Chronic Kidney Disease
Management of End Stage Renal Disease:
Process: Percent of dialysis patients registered on waiting list for transplantationd 2000 Percent 21 ns ns - - + + ns + - - USRDS 1.15b
Process: Percent of patients with treated chronic kidney failure who receive a transplant within three years of renal failuree-h 1997 Percent 20 ns ns ns ns - + ns ns - ns USRDS 1.16b
Diabetes
Management of Diabetes:
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a hemoglobin A1c measurement at least once in the past year 2001 Percent 79.4 ns n/a ns ns ns ns + n/a ns ns BRFSS 1.20c
Management of Diabetes:
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a retinal eye examination in past year 2001 Percent 66.7 ns n/a ns ns ns ns + n/a ns ns BRFSS 1.22b
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a foot examination in past year 2001 Percent 64.6 ns n/a ns - ns - ns n/a ns ns BRFSS 1.23b
Percent of adults with diabetes who had an influenza immunization in past year 2001 Percent 37.4 ns n/a - ns ns - ns ns ns ns BRFSS 1.24b
Heart Disease
Screening for high cholesterol:
Process: Percent of adults 18 and over receiving cholesterol measurement within 5 years 2001 Percent 73 ns - ns - - ns + + + + BRFSS 1.32b
Counseling on risk factors:
Process: Percent of smokers (age 18 and over) receiving advice to quit smoking 2001 Percent 71 n/a ns ns ns n/a n/a - ns n/a n/a BRFSS 1.33b
Treatment of AMI:
Process: Percent of AMI patients administered aspirin within 24 hours of admissionj 2000-2001 Percent 85 - ns ns - ns + ns ns ns - QIO 1.34bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with aspirin prescribed at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 86 ns ns ns ns ns + ns + + - QIO 1.35bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients administered beta blocker within 24 hours of admissionj 2000-2001 Percent 69 - ns ns - ns ns + ns ns ns QIO 1.36bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with beta blocker prescribed at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 79 ns ns ns - - + ns ns ns ns QIO 1.37bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction prescribed ACE inhibitor at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 74 ns + ns ns ns ns ns ns ns - QIO 1.38bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients given smoking cessation counseling while hospitalizedj 2000-2001 Percent 43 ns ns ns ns - ns ns ns ns ns QIO 1.39bjj
Process: Median Time to thrombolysis. Time on arrival to initiation of a thrombolytic agent patients with ST segment elevation or left branch block (LBBB) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) performed closest to hospital arrival timej-k 1999-2000 Median 62 - ns ns ns ns ns ns + n/a ns QIO 1.40bjj
Process: Median time to PTCA. Median time from arrival to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with ST segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) performed closest to hospital arrival time.j, l 1999-2000 Median 186 ns + + + ns ns + + ns ns QIO 1.41bjj
Treatment of acute heart failure:
Process: Percent of heart failure patients having evaluation of left ventricular ejection fractionj 2000-2001 Percent 69 ns ns + - ns ns + + ns + QIO 1.42bjj
Process: Percent of heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction prescribed ACE inhibitor at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 66 ns ns ns - ns ns ns + ns ns QIO 1.43bjj

Part 2: Georgia-Kansas

Measure Title Year Metric U.S. Est. GA Sig. HI Sig. ID Sig. IL Sig. IN Sig. IA Sig. KS Sig. Source NHQR Table
1. Effectiveness of Care
Cancer
Screening for breast cancer
Process: Percent of women (age 40 and over) who report they had a mammogram within the past 2 years 2001 Percent 76.00 + + n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a BRFSS 1.1b
2000 Percent 76.70 ns ns - ns - ns ns BRFSS 1.1c
Screening for cervical cancer:
Process: Percent of women (age 18 and over) who report that they had a Pap smear within the past 3 years 2001 Percent 84.80 + + n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a BRFSS 1.3b
2000 Percent 83.70 + + - - ns ns ns BRFSS 1.3c
Screening for colorectal cancer:
Process: Percent of men and women (age 50 and over) who report they ever had a flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy 2001 Percent 47.60 ns ns - - ns ns - BRFSS 1.5b
Process: Percent of men and women (age 50 and over) who report they had a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within the past 2 years 2001 Percent 35.30 ns + - + - ns ns BRFSS 1.6b
Chronic Kidney Disease
Management of End Stage Renal Disease:
Process: Percent of dialysis patients registered on waiting list for transplantationd 2000 Percent 21 - ns ns + - + ns USRDS 1.15b
Process: Percent of patients with treated chronic kidney failure who receive a transplant within three years of renal failuree-h 1997 Percent 20 - ns + + ns + ns USRDS 1.16b
Diabetes
Management of Diabetes:
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a hemoglobin A1c measurement at least once in the past year 2001 Percent 79.4 ns + + n/a n/a ns ns BRFSS 1.20c
Management of Diabetes:
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a retinal eye examination in past year 2001 Percent 66.7 ns ns - n/a n/a + ns BRFSS 1.22b
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a foot examination in past year 2001 Percent 64.6 ns + ns n/a n/a ns ns BRFSS 1.23b
Percent of adults with diabetes who had an influenza immunization in past year 2001 Percent 37.4 ns + ns ns ns + ns BRFSS 1.24b
Heart Disease
Screening for high cholesterol:
Process: Percent of adults 18 and over receiving cholesterol measurement within 5 years 2001 Percent 73 + + - - ns - - BRFSS 1.32b
Counseling on risk factors:
Process: Percent of smokers (age 18 and over) receiving advice to quit smoking 2001 Percent 71 n/a n/a n/a n/a ns n/a n/a BRFSS 1.33b
Treatment of AMI:
Process: Percent of AMI patients administered aspirin within 24 hours of admissionj 2000-2001 Percent 85 - + + ns ns ns ns QIO 1.34bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with aspirin prescribed at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 86 ns ns ns - ns ns ns QIO 1.35bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients administered beta blocker within 24 hours of admissionj 2000-2001 Percent 69 - ns ns ns ns + ns QIO 1.36bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with beta blocker prescribed at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 79 ns ns ns ns ns + ns QIO 1.37bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction prescribed ACE inhibitor at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 74 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns QIO 1.38bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients given smoking cessation counseling while hospitalizedj 2000-2001 Percent 43 ns ns ns ns + ns ns QIO 1.39bjj
Process: Median Time to thrombolysis. Time on arrival to initiation of a thrombolytic agent patients with ST segment elevation or left branch block (LBBB) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) performed closest to hospital arrival timej-k 1999-2000 Median 62 ns ns + ns ns ns ns QIO 1.40bjj
Process: Median time to PTCA. Median time from arrival to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with ST segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) performed closest to hospital arrival time.j, l 1999-2000 Median 186 n/a + + ns ns + ns QIO 1.41bjj
Treatment of acute heart failure:
Process: Percent of heart failure patients having evaluation of left ventricular ejection fractionj 2000-2001 Percent 69 ns + - ns ns ns - QIO 1.42bjj
Process: Percent of heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction prescribed ACE inhibitor at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 66 ns ns ns ns ns ns ns QIO 1.43bjj

Part 3- Kentucky to Missouri

Measure Title Year Metric U.S. Est. KY Sig. LA Sig. ME Sig. MD Sig. MA Sig. MI Sig. MN Sig. MS Sig. MO Sig. Source NHQR Table
1. Effectiveness of Care
Cancer
Screening for breast cancer
Process: Percent of women (age 40 and over) who report they had a mammogram within the past 2 years 2001 Percent 76.00 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a - n/a BRFSS 1.1b
2000 Percent 76.70 ns ns ns + + + - - ns BRFSS 1.1c
Screening for cervical cancer:
Process: Percent of women (age 18 and over) who report that they had a Pap smear within the past 3 years 2001 Percent 84.80 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a ns n/a BRFSS 1.3b
2000 Percent 83.70 ns ns ns + + ns ns ns ns BRFSS 1.3c
Screening for colorectal cancer:
Process: Percent of men and women (age 50 and over) who report they ever had a flexible sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy 2001 Percent 47.60 - - ns + + + + - - BRFSS 1.5b
Process: Percent of men and women (age 50 and over) who report they had a fecal occult blood test (FOBT) within the past 2 years 2001 Percent 35.30 - - + + + ns ns - - BRFSS 1.6b
Chronic Kidney Disease
Management of End Stage Renal Disease:
Process: Percent of dialysis patients registered on waiting list for transplantation d 2000 Percent 21 - - ns + + + + - ns USRDS 1.15b
Process: Percent of patients with treated chronic kidney failure who receive a transplant within three years of renal failuree-h 1997 Percent 20 + - ns + + ns + - + USRDS 1.16b
Diabetes
Management of Diabetes:
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a hemoglobin A1c measurement at least once in the past year 2001 Percent 79.4 + n/a ns n/a ns ns + n/a n/a BRFSS 1.20c
Management of Diabetes:
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a retinal eye examination in past year 2001 Percent 66.7 ns n/a + n/a ns ns ns n/a n/a BRFSS 1.22b
Percent of adults with diabetes who had a foot examination in past year 2001 Percent 64.6 ns n/a ns n/a ns ns + n/a n/a BRFSS 1.23b
Percent of adults with diabetes who had an influenza immunization in past year 2001 Percent 37.4 ns - ns ns ns - ns - ns BRFSS 1.24b
Heart Disease
Screening for high cholesterol:
Process: Percent of adults 18 and over receiving cholesterol measurement within 5 years 2001 Percent 73 ns ns + + + ns + - - BRFSS 1.32b
Counseling on risk factors:
Process: Percent of smokers (age 18 and over) receiving advice to quit smoking 2001 Percent 71 ns + + n/a n/a n/a n/a ns ns BRFSS 1.33b
Treatment of AMI:
Process: Percent of AMI patients administered aspirin within 24 hours of admissionj 2000-2001 Percent 85 ns ns + ns ns ns ns - ns QIO 1.34bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with aspirin prescribed at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 86 ns - + ns ns ns ns ns ns QIO 1.35bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients administered beta blocker within 24 hours of admissionj 2000-2001 Percent 69 ns ns + ns + ns + - ns QIO 1.36bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with beta blocker prescribed at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 79 ns ns + ns + + ns - ns QIO 1.37bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction prescribed ACE inhibitor at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 74 ns ns ns ns ns + ns ns ns QIO 1.38bjj
Process: Percent of AMI patients given smoking cessation counseling while hospitalizedj 2000-2001 Percent 43 ns - ns - ns ns ns ns + QIO 1.39bjj
Process: Median Time to thrombolysis. Time on arrival to initiation of a thrombolytic agent patients with ST segment elevation or left branch block (LBBB) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) performed closest to hospital arrival timej-k 1999-2000 Median 62 + ns ns + ns ns + ns ns QIO 1.40bjj
Process: Median time to PTCA. Median time from arrival to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with ST segment elevation or left bundle branch block (LBBB) on the electrocardiogram (ECG) performed closest to hospital arrival time.j, l 1999-2000 Median 186 n/a ns n/a ns ns + ns ns ns QIO 1.41bjj
Treatment of acute heart failure:
Process: Percent of heart failure patients having evaluation of left ventricular ejection fractionj 2000-2001 Percent 69 - ns ns + + ns ns - ns QIO 1.42bjj
Process: Percent of heart failure patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction prescribed ACE inhibitor at dischargej 2000-2001 Percent 66 - ns ns ns ns ns ns - ns QIO 1.43bjj

Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care