| | |
1. | |
| Internally within your company
From a peer in your sector
Environmental consultant
|
2. | |
|
The Montgomery County Resource Recovery Facility (MCRRF) is a municipal waste-to-energy facility operated by Covanta Montgomery Inc., on behalf of the Northeast Maryland Waste Disposal Authority (NMWDA) and the Montgomery County Department of Public Works and Transportation (DPWT). The MCRRF consists of three independent combustion trains that have a total design capacity of 1,800 tons/day with an average heating value of 5,500 Btu/lb of municipal solid waste (MSW) combusted. The thermal output from the facility is used to generate up to 63 megawatts of electricity.
|
3. | |
| 562213
|
4. | |
| 50-99
|
5. | |
|
1977 - Outstanding Civil Engineering Project awarded by the National Capital Section of the American Society of Civil Engineers
1998 - Excellence in Environmental Engineering for Operations/Management Grand Prize from the American Academy of Environmental Engineers
1998 - Waste-to-Energy Gold Excellence in Municipal Solid Waste Management from the Solid Waste Association of North America
2000 - Outstanding Waste-to-Energy Facility of the Year Award, Solid Waste Processing Division, from the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
2005 - Waste to Energy Gold Award, Excellence in Municipal Solid Waste Management from the Solid Waste Association of North America
2006 - Awarded Maryland Occupational Safety and Health Voluntary Protection Program (VPP) Star Status
|
6. | |
| No
|
| |
|
|
| | |
1. | |
|
| | |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
| No
|
2. | |
|
|
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
| |
| Yes
|
3. | |
| Yes
|
4. | |
| Yes
|
5. | |
| October 06
|
6. | |
| Yes
|
7. | |
| Yes
|
8. | ? |
| Yes
|
| |
| NEPT Independent Assessment Protocol
|
9. | |
| September 06
|
10. | |
| William H. Barnes, Avogadro Environmental Corporation, 1350 Sullivan Trail, Easton, PA 18040
|
| | Air Emissions |
| | CO |
| All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc. | All |
| |
During calendar years 2005-2006, the MCRRF experienced a significant increase in the number and severity of tube failures in the evaporative section of the boilers. In an effort to reduce these events, improve boiler availability, and reduce resultant emissions from these malfunctions, the MCRRF proposes to perform a thorough evaluation of evaporation tube condition and develop an action plan for repair and/or replacement. CO emissions reflect both stationary and mobile source emissions from the facility. |
| | No
|
| | Yes |
| |
|
| | Material Use |
| | Hazardous materials used |
| All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc. |
Specific |
| |
Petroleum distillate (cold cleaning solvent) |
| |
The MCRRF currently uses a typical cold cleaning solvent in its maintenance operations. This material is supplied by Safety Kleen and enters into the annual calculation of hazardous waste generated at the facility. The facility proposes to perform an evaluation of solvent cleaning options to minimize or eliminate the use of hazardous materials and/or generation of hazardous waste. This commitment involves the reduction of new cold cleaning solvent used by the facility.
|
| | No
|
| | Yes |
| |
|
| | Material Use |
| | Hazardous materials used |
| All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc. | Specific |
| |
Ethylene glycol. |
| |
The MCRRF currently uses a ethylene glycol-based antifreeze in its maintenance operations. The facility proposes to perform an evaluation of antifreeze options to minimize or eliminate the use of hazardous materials and/or generation of hazardous waste. These options will include recycled antifreeze, extended life antifreeze, and propylene glycol-based materials. This commitment involves a reduction in the amount of new ethylene glycol-based antifreeze used at the facility. |
| | No
|
| | Yes |
| |
|
| | Discharges to Water |
| | Sediment from Runoff |
| All measurements should represent the performance level for the indicator across the entire facility. For many indicators, however, you may choose to focus your commitment on a specific subset of the indicator, e.g. a specific material, a specific group of toxic air emissions, a particular waste component, a specific VOC, etc. | All |
| |
The MCRRF has a storm water collection system that directs rainwater from roadways, parking lots, roof drains, rail yard, and other locations to a storm water pond at the southwest corner of the facility. This pond eventually discharges to a unnamed tributary of the Potomac River. The facility proposes to reduce sediment runoff at two selected locations that have shown to have significant impact on storm water quality. These efforts will focus on sediment filters and curbing. This committment focuses on the reduction of sediment discharged from these two selected locations. Annual quantities reflect a total of all sediment discharges to the storm water collection system at the facility. |
| | No
|
| | No |
| |
Sediment at this facility has the potential to include MWC ash that contains several heavy metals. Minimizing sediment runoff will therefore minimize possible heavy metal introduction to the environment. |
| | |
1. | |
|
Few concerns have been raised in recent history. Community concerns are usually first directed through the Montgomery County DEP. State agency notifications are done properly and in a timely manner. Anticipated malfunctions or CEM analyzer outages are communicated to MDE.
The Dickerson Area Facility Implementation Group (DAFIG) and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) are two organizations that the facility actively participates in to maintain strong channels with the community for voicing any concerns.
|
2. | |
|
Recently, CMI has implemented several communications programs that go well beyond permit or contract requirements including daily e-mail notification of any air permit exceedances to Montgomery County officials, and website access to hourly emissions data by the general public.The Dickerson Area Facility Implementation Group (DAFIG) and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) are two organizations that the facility actively participates in to maintain strong channels with the community for communicating important environmental matters.
|
3. | |
| Web Site |
| URL: http://www.covantaenergy.com/facilities/wte/montgomery.asp |
| Please Specify Other:Annual report to the community which includes environmental issues
|
4. | |
| No
|
| |
|
|
5. | |
| Representative of a Community/ Citizen Group |
|    | Dickerson Area Facility Implementation Group (DAFIG) and Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) |
|    | Walt Sonneville |
|    | (301) 869-4460 |
| State/tribal/local regulator |
|    | Maryland Department of the Environment, Air and Radiation Management Administration (ARMA) |
|    | Steve Lang |
|    | (410) 537-3944 |
| Other community/local reference (e.g., emergency management official or business associate) |
|    | Private citizen (retired Montgomery County DPWT employee) |
|    | Dr. Ramana Rao |
|    | (301) 972-3514 |
| | |
Facility Identification Information
|
1. | (A RCRA number is used in the RCRA Info for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) programs). |
| Yes |
| MDR000513036
|
2. | (A TRI number is used in the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) for Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). |
| No |
3. | (An AFS number is used in the AIRS Facility Subsystem of the Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS) for Clean Air Act programs). |
| Yes |
| 2403101718
|
4. | (A PCS/NPDES number is used in the Permit Compliance System (PCS) for Clean Water Act programs monitoring National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits). |
| Yes |
| MD0065447
|
5. | (A FIFRA number is given to facilities regulated by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)). |
| No |
Air Characteristics
|
1. | |
| Yes
|
2. | |
| Yes
|
3. | |
| No
|
4. | |
| No
|
5. | |
| Yes
|
| 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts Cb and Ea
|
6. | |
| No
|
7. | |
| Yes |
| 40 CFR Part 60, Subparts Cb and Ea
|
8. | |
| No |
|
|
9. | |
| Yes
|
10. | |
| No
|
11. | |
| Yes |
| NOx, SO2, CO, PM10, PM2.5, O3, and Pb
|
12. | |
|
40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db
Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR) Title 26, Subtitle 11
Title V Permit 24-031-01718
|
Water Characteristics
|
1. | |
| Yes
|
2. | |
| Yes
|
3. | |
| Yes
|
4. | |
| Yes
|
5. | |
| No
|
6. | |
| Yes
|
7. | |
| No |
|
|
8. | |
|
Clean Water Act (CWA) Sections 402(b) and 316(b)
COMAR Title 26, Subtitles 6, 8, and 17
Maryland Discharge Permit 01-DP-2844
NPDES Permit MD0065447
|
Hazardous Waste Characteristics
|
1. | |
| No
|
2. | |
| No
|
3. | |
| Yes
|
4. | |
| No
|
5. | |
|
40 CFR Parts 261, 262, and 274
COMAR Title 26, Subtitles 13-15
EPA ID Number MDR 000 513 036
Maryland Permit 2003-WTE-0538
|
Environmental Clean-Up, Restoration, and Corrective Action Characteristics
|
1. | |
| No |
|
|
2. | |
| No |
|
|
3. | |
| No
|
4. | |
| No
|
5. | |
|
None
|
Other Environmental Characteristics
|
1. | |
| No
|
2. | |
| Yes
|
3. | |
| No
|
4. | |
| No
|
5. | |
| Yes
|
6. | |
| Yes
|
7. | |
| No
|
8. | |
|
40 CFR Part 141
COMAR Title 26, Subtitles 4 and 6
Maryland Permit M090G011(04)
|