Agricultural Systems Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
Alternative Cropping Systems
Malting Barley
Nitrate Leaching

Cover Crops
Soil Aggregation

Carbon Sequestration
Tillage/Rotation Effects
Soil Compaction
Spatial/Temporal Variability
Electrical Conductivity

Weed Seedbanks
Nitrogen Management
Site-specific Irrigation
Cercospora Biocontrol

 

Research Project: ECOLOGICALLY-SOUND PEST, WATER, AND SOIL MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR NORTHERN GREAT PLAINS CROPPING SYSTEMS

Location: Agricultural Systems Research Unit

Title: Evaluation of winter cereals for pasture in Montana

Authors
item Hafla, A - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Cash, S - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Surber, L - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Paterson, J - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Lenssen, Andrew
item Todd, A - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY
item Huffman, M - MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY

Submitted to: American Society of Animal Science
Publication Type: Proceedings/Symposium
Publication Acceptance Date: April 15, 2008
Publication Date: N/A

Technical Abstract: In the southern Great Plains, it is common to graze winter wheat pastures prior to grain harvest to take advantage of economic returns from the grain crop and value added to livestock. In Montana, a similar management practice could provide complementary pasture for livestock in the late spring to relieve pressure on cool season native rangelands. A two year study was conducted to evaluate the forage yield and quality of winter cereals, when grazed at three growth stages, vegetative (V), boot stage (B), and at heading (H), prior to hay and grain harvest. Western white faced ewes were used to graze plots at each date. Ungrazed forage yield and quality was measured at each date and on each date following grazing. `Willow Creek¿ winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and `Trical 102¿ triticale (XTriticosecale Wttm.) were planted in the fall of 2005, using best management practices for grazing experiments in 2006. For the 2007 trial, only winter wheat was evaluated. In 2006, available forage yield of wheat and triticale did not differ (P = 0.37) at V, however triticale had higher yields (P = 0.05) at B, H, and at haying. Following grazing by ewes, hay yields were reduced in wheat by 30, 54, and 75% and in triticale by 21, 66, and 86% when grazed at V, B, and H, respectively. Forage utilization by ewes of wheat and triticale were similar at V and H, but wheat was lower (P = 0.05) than triticale at B. Forage quality and nitrate concentrations were highest at V, and declined similarly in wheat and triticale through B. Ungrazed wheat at H had higher (P = 0.05) 48 h in situ dry matter disappearance (ISDMD), CP, and DM and lower NDF and ADF than triticale. In 2007, forage yield of ungrazed wheat at haying was 12.9 t/ha. Hay yield losses for wheat were 34, 85, and 65% for grazed forage at V, B and H, respectively. Forage utilization by ewes was 66, 62, and 55% respectively. Forage quality was highest at V, and declined through haying. These results indicate that spring grazing of winter cereals in an integrated crop livestock system should occur during the vegetative state. Cereal pasture at this stage had excellent forage quality and grazing had limited impacts on subsequent hay yields.

   

 
Project Team
Evans, Robert - Bob
Lenssen, Andrew - Andy
Sainju, Upendra
Jabro, Jalal "jay"
Stevens, William - Bart
Allen, Brett
Caesar, Thecan
Lartey, Robert
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Integrated Farming Systems (207)
  Water Availability and Water Management (211)
 
 
Last Modified: 11/05/2008
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House