Quality-of-life issues complicate decisions about prostate
cancer screening
Annual screening of asymptomatic men for prostate cancer,
beginning at age 50, remains controversial. Screening may detect
microscopic cancers that are not detrimental to the patient. Yet
treatments such as surgery and radiation can result in rectal
injury, impotence, and urinary incontinence, as well as death (1
percent mortality rate for radical prostatectomy).
Different experts offer conflicting recommendations on prostate
cancer screening—for example, the American Cancer Society
says yes, but the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force says no.
Unfortunately, better data won't be available for years, but
patients and providers have to make decisions now, using
imperfect data.
A recent study concludes that, if life expectancy is the only
criterion for the screening decision, and cost is not a factor,
annual screening of asymptomatic men may extend a patient's life
expectancy by a few months. However, when one considers how an
individual man assesses the impact of screening and possible
treatment on his quality of life, screening is not recommended,
according to researchers at the University of Texas.
The researchers used a decision-analytic model to evaluate the
outcomes of annual screening for prostate cancer beginning at age
50 using digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasound, and
the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. The investigators
interviewed a sample of 10 patients with no history of prostate
disease to assess their preferences regarding the various adverse
outcomes of prostate cancer treatment, using the time trade-off
method. This method is used to determine the amount of life
expectancy in a suboptimal state of health (for example,
incontinent or impotent) a patient would be willing to trade for
a shorter life expectancy in perfect health.
When men were presented with being screened and treated
aggressively for detected cancer, radiation was barely preferable
to surgery for the early stages of cancer. They preferred the
no-screening strategy to the screening strategy by 8
quality-adjusted life months (presumably living for 8 months
without the side effects of treatment such as rectal injury,
incontinence, or impotence). Only if quality-of-life
considerations were disregarded, was screening preferred to no
screening.
Although only a small sample (10) of asymptomatic men were
involved in this study, the researchers believe that an optimal
screening decision depends on the patient's evaluation of
potential adverse outcomes. Thus, they urge physicians to
carefully weigh patient preferences when making recommendations
about prostate cancer screening.
The results of this study were presented in part at a 1993
conference sponsored by the Agency for Health Care Policy and
Research. More details are in "Prostate cancer screening: A
decision analysis," by Scott B. Cantor, Ph.D., Stephen J. Spann,
M.D., Robert J. Volk, Ph.D., and others, in The Journal of
Family Practice 41(1), pp. 33-41, 1995.
Aggressive treatment for localized prostate cancer may be
unwarranted in older men
Men over 65 years of age with slow-growing,localized prostate
cancer who receive conservative management with hormone therapy
may live as long as the general population. This finding, which
is based on a study supported by the Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research (HS06770), suggests that aggressive radiation
treatment and surgery for low-grade prostate cancer tumors, which
can result in impotence and incontinence, may be unwarranted in
older men.
The researchers, led by Peter C. Albertsen, M.D., of the
University of Connecticut Health Center, used records from 37
acute care hospitals and 2 Veterans Affairs medical centers to
compare the outcomes of elderly men diagnosed with clinically
localized prostate cancer from 1971 to 1976. At that time,
immediate or delayed hormonal therapy was the most common
treatment for localized prostate cancer among older men.
More than 15 years later, the age-adjusted survival of untreated
men with low-grade, localized prostate cancer was not
significantly different from those who were conservatively
treated. On the other hand, untreated men with moderate-grade
tumors (regional metastasis) potentially had as much as 4 to 5
years less life expectancy, and those with high-grade tumors
(distant metastasis) potentially had as much as 6 to 8 years less
life expectancy compared with the general population.
Tumor characteristics and coexisting patient illnesses were
powerful independent predictors of survival and should be
factored into decisions about treatment, according to the
researchers. They conclude that prospective randomized trials are
the only way to judge the ability of more aggressive treatment to
save potentially lost years for patients with moderate- and
high-grade tumors of the prostate.
See "Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated
localized prostate cancer," by Dr. Albertsen, Dennis G. Fryback,
Ph.D., Barry E. Storer, Ph.D., and others, in the Journal of
the American Medical Association 274(8), pp. 626-631,
1995.
Health services research plays a pivotal role in health care
decisionmaking
The share of Federal spending on health care devoted to health
services research dropped from 1 percent to .1 percent between
1970 and 1994. Yet health services research is needed more than
ever by consumers, health plans, and others, according to Clifton
R. Gaus, Sc.D., Administrator of the Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research, and Acting Deputy Administrator, Lisa
Simpson, M.B., B.Ch, M.P.H., in a recent editorial.
Health services research can increase understanding about what
works and what doesn't work in managed care, and findings from
health services research can inform consumers about the risks and
benefits of available treatments and the quality of services
provided by individual clinicians. Further, health services
research is also needed to identify the information most likely
to assist consumers and employers in choosing health plans and to
aid decisions by accrediting groups and State regulators.
The evolving health care system is being driven by market forces
and competition rather than regulation, according to Drs. Gaus
and Simpson. Its success will depend on the ability to generate
the information needed to inform choices and reward consumer,
purchaser, provider, or health plan behaviors that promote
quality and constrain costs. The government plays an essential
role in generating this information to ensure that it is
science-based, objective, and widely disseminated.
Nevertheless, this Federal role must be carried out in
partnership with the private sector, as exemplified by several
recent AHCPR initiatives. The authors conclude that, beyond
strengthening existing partnerships and building new ones, health
services research should "reinvent" itself to respond to its
challenges.
Further details are in "Reinventing health services research," by
Drs. Gaus and Simpson, in the Summer 1995 issue of Inquiry 32,
pp. 130-134.
Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Section