OMB No. 2010-0032
Expiration Date 01/31/2010
2004 Performance Track Annual Performance Report















Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control
A060033
 Year 3 Annual Performance Report

























SECTION A: GENERAL FACILITY INFORMATION

A.1Name of your facility:
Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control

A.2Name of your parent company:
Lockheed Martin Corporation

A.3Facility contact person for the Performance Track program:
  Name:Mr. Edward W. Soleau
  Title:Environment Safety and Health Manager
  Phone:(870) 574-0200
  Fax:(870) 574-4027
  Email:ed.soleau@lmco.com

A.4
Facility location:
  Street Address:Hwy 274 South
  Address Cont:Highland Industrial Park
  City:East Camden
  State:AR
  Zip Code:71701


Mailing address (if different from above):
  Mailing Address:P. O. Box 1015 M/S: CM-143
  Address Cont:
  City:Camden
  State:AR
  Zip Code:71711

A.5
Facility's website address (if any):
http://vs.lmco.com

A.6
Number of employees (full-time equivalents) who currently work in the facility:
100-499

A.7
North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) Code(s) that is(are) used to classify business at the facility:
336414        

A.8
In your application and, perhaps, in previous annual performance reports, you described what your facility does or makes. Have there been any (additional) changes to your facility's list of products and/or activities? If yes, please list them here:

Yes

At Camden Operations, we are now manufacturing new derivative product lines. Instead of the track-laying vehicle rocket launcher, we have developed a wheeled vehicle launcher. We have also switched to a more technologically advanced missile to help support our deployed army.

A.9
Have the environmental requirements applicable to your facility changed during this reporting period? If yes, please describe these changes here.

No Changes


SECTION B: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

B.1.aWhen was an EMS assessment last conducted by an independent party at your facility?
2004

If an assessment was conducted during 2004, please provide the type (e.g., ISO 14001 certification), the scope, and the month(s) of each assessment.

Type
Scope
Dates
ISO 14001 This audit was performed by BSI. The scope included a complete review of our Environmental Management System, as well as compliance verification.   April  2004  



B.1.bWhen was an internal EMS assessment last conducted at your facility?
2004

If an assessment was conducted during 2004, please provide the scope and month(s) of each assessment.

Scope
Dates

Successful internal ESH management system/compliance audit conducted by off-site Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control employees.

July  2004

Program reviews and audits are conducted throughout the year.

January  2004



B.1.cWhen was an internal or corporate compliance audit last conducted at your facility?
2003




B.1.d(Optional) If you would like to describe any other audits or inspections that were conducted at your facility, please do so here.

Our facility has quarterly Defence Contract Management Agency (DCMA) audits which is a Safety and health audit. We also have peer audits that are conducted by other Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control sites. Each week we also perform internal ESH audits within the facility.

B.1.eBriefly summarize corrective actions taken and other improvements made as a result of your EMS assessments and compliance audits.

Due to the EMS assessments and compliance audits, we have initiated two main actions. Camden operations has installed a Quality Control System in the Waste Water Treatment Facility and substituted Acrastrip for MNAK, which is used for paint process equipment cleanout (where feasible). We are also in the process of installing a solvent recycler to reduce the amount of MEK waste. As far as sludge production, we have just been approved for the use of a sludge dryer. It will be installed soon and will decrease waste numbers drastically.

B.1.fHas your facility corrected all instances of potential non-compliance and EMS non-conformance identified during your audits and other assessments?
No such instances identified



B.1.gWhen was the last Senior Management review of your EMS completed?
March  2004
Who was the senior manager present at the review?
Name: Ms. DD Currie
Title: Manager, ESH, LMMFC-Dallas

B.2.aISO 14001 Certification. Is your facility currently certified to ISO 14001?
Yes

B.2.bIs your facility a Responsible Care-certified facility?
No

B.3Environmental Aspects Identification. When did your facility last conduct a systematic identification and/or review of your environmental aspects?
November  2004

B.4Progress Toward Achieving Objectives and Targets. In the table below, please provide a narrative summary of progress made toward EMS objectives and targets other than those reported as Environmental Performance Commitments in Section C. You may limit the summary to environmental aspects that are significant and towards which progress has been made during the reporting year. Do you have additional environmental aspects to report? No





SECTION C: ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENTS

COMMITMENT 1

Category:Waste
Aspect:Hazardous Solid Waste
Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2001
2002
2003
2004
2004
Actual Quantity (per year):
53,918
76,716
73560
88429
58,905
Measurement Units:
lbs
   Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.16
1.39
1.1
1.2 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
"Touch-labor" hours
Normalized Quantity per year:
53,918
66,134.48
52,920.86
80,390
49087.5
* Estimated

C.1.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
The Hazardous Solid Waste exceeded the performance commitment due to the start up of new product lines throughout the years following 2001. Hazardous waste generation was increased due to new equipment startup trial and error for the military, and from the increased use of liquid solvent used for line flushing operations in one of the coating operations. Most of our paint line flushing operations have been able to switch to an aqueous based product but we have a coating operation that is so sensitive that MEK solvent continues to be used. We are presently testing the feasibility of using a solvent distillation unit for possible re-use of this flushing solvent to reduce usage of the raw product material as well as the waste generated.

C.1.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



COMMITMENT 2

Category:Waste
Aspect:Total Solid Waste
Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2001
2002
2003
2004
2004
Actual Quantity (per year):
265
259
222.9
159
289
Measurement Units:
tons
   Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.16
1.39
1.1
1.2 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
"Touch-labor" hours
Normalized Quantity per year:
265
223.28
160.36
144.55
240.83
* Estimated

C.2.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
Camden Operations is working diligently to reduce solid waste by enhancing our recycling program and disposing of materials in innovative ways.

C.2.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



COMMITMENT 3

Category:Energy Use
Aspect:Total Energy Use
Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2001
2002
2003
2004
2004
Actual Quantity (per year):
16,902
19,818
20,829
19,490
18,466
Measurement Units:
MwH
   Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.16
1.39
1.1
1.2 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
"Touch-labor" hours
Normalized Quantity per year:
16,902
17,084.48
14,984.89
17,718.18
15,388.33
* Estimated

C.3.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
Camden Operations started an aggressive energy campaign in 2003 that increased employee awareness and interest in energy conservation. We have swithched over to Green tipped bulbs in most light fixtures as well. However, our energy usage increased for two main reasons. The PAC3 missile facility, which uses heating and cooling, was constructed after 2001. This building includes two coating booths that use 300 tons alone for air conditioning. This operation is very sensitive to temperature and humidity requirements. The launcher test building behind the Camden Launcher Integration Complex was also built which increased energy use.

C.3.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).



COMMITMENT 4

Category:Air Emissions
Aspect:Emissions of VOCs
Baseline
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Performance
Commitment
Calendar Year:
2001
2002
2003
2004
2004
Actual Quantity (per year):
13.37
16.40
14.5
14.34
14.6
Measurement Units:
tons
   Other:
Normalizing Factor:
1.0
1.16
1.35
1.1
1.2 *
Basis for your Normalizing Factor:
"Touch-labor" hours
Normalized Quantity per year:
13.37
14.14
10.74
13.04
12.17
* Estimated

C.4.bBriefly describe how you achieved improvements for this aspect or, if relevant, any circumstances that delayed progress.
Emissions of VOCs still decreased from last year for the actual quantity, but exceeded the performance commitment value with the estimated normalizing factor. Even though touch labor hours went down, there were two new production processes added to support new missile programs. These operations included the installation and operation of three additional coating booths, three ovens, and four sanding booths all with emissions accounted for under the facility air permit. Just one facility’s booth operation alone averaged about 2,000 hours of emissions per year over a two year period. We currently have three on-site chemical engineers continuosly working on methods to reduce emissions. We are currently in the process of testing a solvent still for solvent reuse, as well as alternative solvents not on the HAPs list.

C.4.cPlease list any other EPA voluntary programs to which you are also reporting these data (e.g. Energy Star, Project XL).


SECTION D: PUBLIC OUTREACH AND PERFORMANCE REPORTING




D.1Please briefly describe the activities that your facility conducted during the year to interact with the community on environmental issues and to report publicly on environmental performance.

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, Camden Operations, is an active member of the Camden Area Highland Industrial Safety and Environmental Board, the Ouachita County Local Emergency Planning Committee, as well as the Arkansas Environmental Federation. Camden operations continues to work with the community in a varietiy of different ways. We promote ESH issues through active involvment in several community groups. Camden operations personnel have individually contributed to countless community activities such as local elementary ESH awareness, Earth Day, recycling incintives, walk-a-thons, and beautification projects. Lockheed Martin supports, encourages and recognizes these efforts by asking employess to log all volunteer time and recognizes those that have shown exceptional effort.

D.2Please indicate which of the following methods your facility plans to use to make its Performance Track Annual Performance Report available to the public.

Other
Please Specify Other: Community Local Emergency Planning Committee


Attachments (if applicable) :