[Federal Register: December 7, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 234)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 72733-72739]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr07de05-15]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Notice No. 54]
RIN 1513-AA89
Proposed Establishment of Tracy Hills Viticultural Area (2003R-
508P)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau proposes to
establish the 39,200-acre Tracy Hills viticultural area in San Joaquin
and Stanislaus Counties, California, approximately 55 miles east-
southeast of San Francisco. We designate viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they may purchase. We invite
comments on this proposed addition to our regulations.
DATES: We must receive written comments on or before February 6, 2006.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments to any of the following addresses:
Director, Regulations and Rulings Division, Alcohol and
Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Attn: Notice No. 54, P.O. Box 14412,
Washington, DC 20044-4412.
202-927-8525 (facsimile).
nprm@ttb.gov (e-mail).
[[Page 72734]]
http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm. An online
comment form is posted with this notice on our Web site.
http://www.regulations.gov (Federal e-rulemaking portal;
follow instructions for submitting comments).
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, the appropriate
maps, and any comments we receive about this notice by appointment at
the TTB Library, 1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. To make an
appointment, call 202-927-2400. You may also access copies of the
notice and comments online at http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm
.
See the Public Participation section of this notice for specific
instructions and requirements for submitting comments, and for
information on how to request a public hearing.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: N. A. Sutton, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 925 Lakeville St.,
No. 158, Petaluma, CA 94952; telephone 415-271-1254.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (the FAA
Act, 27 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) requires that alcohol beverage labels
provide consumers with adequate information regarding product identity
and prohibits the use of misleading information on those labels. The
FAA Act also authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to issue
regulations to carry out its provisions. The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers these regulations.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains
the list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes
grown in an area to its geographic origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in
that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations requires
the petition to include--
Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
Historical or current evidence that supports setting the
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as
climate, soils, elevation, and physical features, that distinguish the
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
A description of the specific boundary of the proposed
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps; and
A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.
Tracy Hills Petition
TTB has received a petition from Sara Schorske of Compliance
Service of America, Inc., filed on behalf of the Brown family, owners
of a vineyard near Tracy, California. The petitioner proposes to
establish the 39,200-acre ``Tracy Hills'' viticultural area south and
southwest of the city of Tracy, California, in southern San Joaquin and
northern Stanislaus Counties. Located approximately 55 miles east-
southeast of San Francisco, the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area
currently encompasses 1,005 acres of vineyards. The proposed area is
not within, nor does it include, any other proposed or established
viticultural area. The distinguishing climatic features of the proposed
viticultural area, the petition states, include the area's limited
rainfall and consistent winds, along with its sparse fog, frost, and
dew.
Originally, the petitioner proposed the name ``Mt. Oso'' for this
viticultural area. However, after a careful evaluation of the original
petition, TTB concluded, and advised the petitioner, that the submitted
evidence did not demonstrate, as required by section 9.3(b)(1) of the
TTB regulations, that the proposed viticultural area is locally or
nationally known as Mt. Oso. In response, the petitioner amended the
petition to propose use of the name ``Tracy Hills'' for the proposed
viticultural area. The petitioner also has revised the proposed
viticultural area's western boundary and submitted additional evidence
to support the amended petition. We summarize below the information
submitted in support of the petition.
Name Evidence
The petitioner states that the name ``Tracy,'' which is used to
identify the city of Tracy, California, and its surrounding
agricultural land, together with the geographical modifier ``Hills,''
accurately describes and names the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural
area. Stating that the name ``Tracy Hills'' is ``locally and nationally
associated with the proposed area,'' the petition discusses the
rationale for the Tracy Hills name and offers examples of its use for
the land within the proposed viticultural area.
The petition included copies of eight newspaper articles from the
Tracy Press featuring petitioner Jeff Brown's Mt. Oso Vineyards or
wines made from its grapes. The articles list the vineyard's location
as Tracy, demonstrating, according to the petition, the close
association between the proposed area's vineyards and the ``Tracy''
name.
However, the petition states that the use of ``Tracy'' alone for
the proposed viticultural area does not accurately describe the area
and would mislead consumers about the specific location of the area.
The proposed viticultural area includes only a small part of the land
within the Tracy city limits, and it does not include all the land
surrounding the city of Tracy. Due to differences in climate, soil,
water table levels, and slope, the land to the north, east, and
southeast of Tracy is excluded from the proposed viticultural area.
Therefore, the petitioner emphasizes that it would be misleading
and inaccurate to name the proposed viticultural area ``Tracy,''
without the addition of the ``Hills'' modifier. In support of this
usage, the petitioner cites the use of ``Valley'' as a modifier in the
names of the Napa Valley viticultural area (27 CFR 9.23), which
surrounds the city of Napa, and the Temecula Valley viticultural area
(27 CFR 9.50), which lies outside the city of Temecula in southern
California.
To further support the use of the proposed ``Tracy Hills'' name,
the petitioner notes that the Coast Range foothills southwest of the
city of Tracy,
[[Page 72735]]
the lower elevations of which are included within the proposed
viticultural area, are informally called ``the Tracy Hills,'' and the
petitioner provides examples of the name's association with the
proposed area.
The petition states that ``Tracy Hills'' is the name of a large
real estate development located on the southwest side of the city of
Tracy along either side of Interstate Highway 580 (I-580). Part of the
Tracy Hills development, the petition notes, is within the northern
portion of the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area. In 1998, the
city of Tracy annexed the development, according to a July 7, 2004,
Stockton Record newspaper article, ``Council Delays Tracy Hills Vote,''
included in the revised petition. The revised petition also included
copies of, or statements from, Federal government environmental reports
from the early 1990s, a 1999 Sierra Club newsletter, and newspaper
articles from the Sacramento Bee and the Tracy Press that discuss the
Tracy Hills real estate development and its location, growth, and
impact on local water resources.
In addition, the petition included evidence of other references to
the Tracy Hills name. For example, the petition includes a map of the
proposed Northern California Passenger Rail Network. This map shows a
future high-speed rail line running through Altamont Pass and, east of
the pass, a ``Tracy Hills'' station within the Tracy Hills development.
The petition also includes information about the ``Tracy Hills Ride,''
sponsored by the San Joaquin Valley Rangers horse enthusiasts club
(http://www.sjvr.org). This horseback ride begins and ends within the proposed
area along State Highway 132 (Bird Road), according to club information
included in the petition. A 1995 NASCAR publication, the petition
states, places the reopened Altamont Raceway ``in the Tracy hills,''
while a September 29, 2003, East Bay Business Times article titled
``Sutter, Kaiser Build Up Valley Presence,'' notes that a donor gave 20
acres ``in the Tracy hills'' for a hospital.
Boundary Evidence
Located south and southwest of the city of Tracy in southern San
Joaquin and northern Stanislaus Counties, California, the proposed
Tracy Hills viticultural area largely lies between State Route 33 to
the east and Interstate 580 to the west, with a portion of the area
reaching west of the Interstate into the foothills of the Diablo
Mountains. The proposed area is about 15 miles long northwest to
southeast, and about 5 miles wide east to west.
The portion of the Tracy Hills real estate development appropriate
for viticulture, the petitioner explains, is included in the northern
region of the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area. Other parts of
the proposed viticultural area lie within the rural, San Joaquin Valley
agricultural lands to the southwest and south of the city of Tracy,
according to the provided USGS maps and the California State Automobile
Association Central California map of May 2001.
The boundary of the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area,
according to the petitioner, encompasses viticultural features that
distinguish the proposed area from the regions north, east and
southeast of the city of Tracy. According to the petitioner, these
distinguishing features include the proposed area's microclimate,
soils, and slope.
The proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area, which is nestled
between the lower elevations of the San Joaquin River valley floor to
the east and the steeper terrain of the Diablo Range to the west, has
east-sloping terrain, as shown on the provided USGS maps. The proposed
viticultural area boundary encompasses a 400-foot change in elevation
and includes streams and east-sloping alluvial fans and plains,
according to the petitioner and the provided USGS maps.
The petitioner notes that the 100-foot to 500-foot elevation within
the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area is distinct from the
surrounding areas. To the west of the proposed boundary line are the
significantly higher elevations and steep terrain of the Diablo Range,
as noted on USGS maps of the area. To the north and east are the nearly
sea level flood plains of the San Joaquin River. The proposed southern
boundary line, according to the petitioner, is the dividing point
between two alluvial fans.
The petitioner states that the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural
area soils are predominantly of alluvial origin from the higher Diablo
Range elevations, beyond the proposed boundary. While similar to the
soils found to the south, the petitioner explains that the alluvial
soils of the proposed area are distinct from the mountainous
sedimentary soils to the west, the organic peat soils to the north, and
the heavy clay soils to the east.
The petitioner also states that the proposed Tracy Hills
viticultural area has a distinctive microclimate, which contrasts with
the climate found in the surrounding region. The proposed area, the
petition states, is located within the rain shadow created by Mt. Oso,
which is located to the proposed area's southwest in the Diablo
Mountains. This rain shadow effect gives the proposed viticultural area
a drier climate with less fog, dew, frost, and hail. Beyond the
proposed boundary to the west, north, and south, the distinctive
differences in geography and proximity to the Altamont Pass create a
wetter, windier climate, according to the petition.
Distinguishing Features
Topography
The western portion of the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area
lies in the eastern foothills of the Diablo Range, while the remainder
of the proposed area slopes to the east towards the lower elevations of
the San Joaquin River valley, according to the provided USGS maps. This
transitional terrain, between 500 feet and 100 feet in elevation,
creates a 400-foot drop within a 3 to 3.7 mile west-to-east span,
giving the proposed area a 2 percent to 2.5 percent slope, as noted in
the petition.
Three intermittent streams, Corral Hollow, Lone Tree, and Hospital
Creeks, flow east through the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area,
to the San Joaquin Valley flood plain, the petitioner explains. Flowing
down from the higher Diablo Range elevations, these streams created the
alluvial fans and deposits found within the proposed Tracy Hills
viticultural area.
Climate
The petitioner emphasizes that the unique climate of the proposed
Tracy Hills viticultural area is its most distinctive characteristic.
The sheltering effect of Mt. Oso and the Diablo Range, the marine winds
coming through the Altamont Pass, and the cold air drainage from the
higher mountain elevations, the petitioner explains, create a
microclimate in the proposed Tracy Hills area with the lowest annual
rainfall in the Tracy region. The petitioner adds that these climatic
elements combine to produce a microclimate with less rain, fog, dew,
and frost than the surrounding areas.
Rainfall
As noted above, the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area is
located on the west side of the San Joaquin Valley area and, therefore,
according to the petitioner, is in the rain shadow of Mt. Oso in the
Diablo Range. This rain shadow creates an environment with less
precipitation than the surrounding areas, the petitioner adds. Based on
its proximity to the 3,347-foot sheltering Mt. Oso peak, the proposed
Tracy Hills viticultural area has 8 to 9 inches of
[[Page 72736]]
annual rain, the petitioner explains, which is the lowest in the
region. According to the provided San Joaquin County Soil Survey map,
the average annual precipitation, in inches, in the surrounding regions
of San Joaquin County is at least 10 inches. Also, at the higher
mountain elevations, about 9 miles west of the proposed boundary line,
the rainfall map shows about 18 inches, or twice the rainfall of the
proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area. To the north, along the San
Joaquin Valley floor, the precipitation increases correspond to the
longer distances from the rain shadow, with Stockton at about 13 inches
of rain and Lodi at 16 inches of rain annually, according to the
provided rainfall map.
Temperature
The temperatures found in the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural
area vary from the surrounding areas, according to the petitioner. A
statistical table (compiled by Stan Grant of Progressive Viticulture,
Turlock, California) shows the average annual heat accumulation at
various weather stations in the greater Tracy region during the 1990s
as measured in degree days. (Each degree that a day's mean temperature
is above 50 degrees F, which is the minimum temperature required for
grapevine growth, is counted as one degree day; see ``General
Viticulture,'' Albert J. Winkler, University of California Press,
1975.) These 10-year averages reflect lower and upper threshold
temperatures of 50 to 115 degrees F, respectively. All mileages are
according to California State Automobile Association's Central
California map of May 2001.
1990-1999 Degree Day Averages
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Direction/ distance from
Weather station Degree days County the proposed Tracy Hills
viticultural area
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tracy-Carbona....................... 4,033 San Joaquin................. On site.
Brentwood........................... 3,776 Contra Costa................ West 23 miles.
Manteca............................. 3,726 San Joaquin................. North 10 miles.
Modesto............................. 4,446 Stanislaus.................. East 14 miles.
Newman.............................. 4,498 Stanislaus.................. South 22 miles.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brentwood is closer to the cooling maritime influences of San
Francisco Bay and the Carquinez Strait, according to the petitioner,
while Manteca is directly in the path of the cooling marine winds
blowing through the Altamont Pass. The proposed Tracy Hills
viticultural area is located a short distance south of Altamont Pass,
while Modesto is about 25 miles south of the pass. Newman, the warmest
region, is 40 miles south of the pass and its cooling marine winds, the
petitioner states.
Wind
The petitioner explains that the degree day measurement of heat
accumulation referred to above does not indicate seasonal vine growth
and development as accurately when fog, clouds, and a prevailing wind
affect the proposed viticultural area. The significance of wind is
noted in a 1943 USDA Soil Survey of the Tracy area:
Aside from the soil and moisture conditions, which have the most
important bearing on crops that can be grown in this area, another
factor that has a definite influence is wind. The wind during
certain seasons is very strong, blowing from the northwest along the
western side of the San Joaquin Valley.
The constant wind of the Altamont Pass has a cooling effect on
vineyards within the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area through
evaporation of moisture on grapevine leaves, according to the
petitioner. The earth-warmed marine air and winds of the Livermore
Valley blow west-to-east through the Pass, into the San Joaquin Valley,
and then south, passing directly over the proposed viticultural area,
the petitioner explains. Also, the down-slope winds from the Diablo
Range have a cooling climatic influence on the area's agriculture.
Frost and Fog
The petitioner states that residents and workers in the proposed
Tracy Hills viticultural area have observed certain distinctive
climatic characteristics within the area. Frost is ``unknown,'' the
petitioner explains, although it occurs beyond the proposed
viticultural area boundary. Ground fog forms to the south of the
proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area and gradually extends north,
according to the petitioner. If the fog does invade the proposed area
at all, the petitioner notes that it is usually short-lived.
Soil
As noted in the soil maps submitted with the petition, the soils in
the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area are recent alluvial deposits
from the intermittent streams flowing down from the upper elevations of
the Diablo Range to the San Joaquin Valley floor. The geologic fans and
fan terraces found along the Corral Hollow, Hospital and Lonetree
Creeks meld into one vast alluvial plain, according to the San Joaquin
County Soil Survey.
The soils found on this alluvial plain are very deep, well-drained
to moderately well-drained, and have water tables deeper than six feet.
Silty and clay soils are found at the lower elevations of this alluvial
plain, while at its higher elevations, soils are generally gravelly and
the alluvial deposits are eroded with deep drainage cuts. The principal
soils are listed in the table below.
Soil Types in Proposed Tracy Hills Viticultural Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Elevation
Soil type Location (in feet)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carbona clay loam.................. Uplifted, dissected 500-130
terraces.
Zacharias gravelly clay loam....... Alluvial fans, low 300-50
stream terraces.
Stomar clay loam................... Alluvial fans......... 300-40
El Solyo clay loam................. Alluvial fans......... 300-60
[[Page 72737]]
Vernalis clay loam................. Alluvial fans......... 300-25
Vernalis-Zacharias complex......... Alluvial fans......... 250-25
Capay clay......................... Interfan basins....... 200-30
Capay clay, wet.................... Interfan basins....... 140-25
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beyond the boundary of the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area,
the soils and their origins differ, according to the petitioner. To the
north are the low-elevation organic peat soils of the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta region. To the east, and generally below the 100-foot
elevation, are heavy clay soils with higher water tables created by
irrigation and proximity to the San Joaquin River. To the south, the
soils and terrain are similar to the proposed Tracy Hills viticultural
area, with the proposed boundary line primarily defining the border
between the alluvial fans of Hospital Creek, which is within the
proposed viticultural area, and Ingram Creek, which is further to the
south. To the west, and above the 500-foot elevation in the upper
foothills of the Diablo Range, the soils are primarily gravelly, older
alluvial deposits. Also to the west, the soils are rolling to very
steep and situated on terrain of uplifted, dissected terraces and
mountains, developed on bedrock.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the petitioned-for
viticultural area in the proposed regulatory text published at the end
of this notice.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and we list them below
in the proposed regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. If we establish this proposed viticultural area, its
name, ``Tracy Hills,'' will be recognized as a name of viticultural
significance. Consequently, wine bottlers using ``Tracy Hills'' in a
brand name, including a trademark, or in another label reference as to
the origin of the wine, will have to ensure that the product is
eligible to use the viticultural area's name as an appellation of
origin. On the other hand, we do not believe that any single part of
the proposed viticultural area name standing alone, such as ``Tracy,''
would have viticultural significance if the new viticultural area were
to be established. Accordingly, the proposed part 9 regulatory text set
forth in this document specifies only the full ``Tracy Hills'' name as
a term of viticultural significance for purposes of part 4 of the TTB
regulations.
For a wine to be eligible to use as an appellation of origin the
name of a viticultural area specified in part 9 of the TTB regulations,
at least 85 percent of the grapes used to make the wine must have been
grown within the area represented by that name, and the wine must meet
the other requirements of 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not
eligible to use the viticultural area name as an appellation of origin
and that name appears in the brand name, then the label is not in
compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural area name
appears in another reference on the label in a misleading manner, the
bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label. Accordingly, if a
new label or a previously approved label uses the name ``Tracy Hills''
for a wine that does not meet the 85 percent standard, the new label
will not be approved, and the previously approved label will be subject
to revocation, upon the effective date of the approval of the Tracy
Hills viticultural area.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a
viticultural area name that was used as a brand name on a label
approved before July 7, 1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Public Participation
Comments Invited
We invite comments from interested members of the public on whether
we should establish the proposed viticultural area. We are also
interested in receiving comments on the sufficiency and accuracy of the
name, climatic, boundary, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. In particular, we are concerned about the
adequacy of the petition's name evidence. Accordingly, we are seeking
information in this regard from persons familiar with the area as to
whether the ``Tracy Hills'' name reasonably applies to the entire
region encompassed within the boundary of the proposed viticultural
area, and, if not, whether any suitable alternative names exist for the
proposed area. Please provide any available specific information in
support of your comments.
Because of the potential impact of the establishment of the
proposed Tracy Hills viticultural area on brand labels that include the
words ``Tracy Hills'' as discussed above under Impact on Current Wine
Labels, we also are particularly interested in comments regarding
whether there will be a conflict between the proposed area name and
currently used brand names. If a commenter believes that a conflict
will arise, the comment should describe the nature of that conflict,
including any negative economic impact that approval of the proposed
viticultural area will have on an existing viticultural enterprise. We
are also interested in receiving suggestions for ways to avoid any
conflicts, for example by adopting a modified or different name for the
viticultural area.
Although TTB believes that only the full name ``Tracy Hills''
should be considered to have viticultural significance upon
establishment of the proposed viticultural area, we also invite
comments from those who believe that ``Tracy'' standing alone would
have viticultural significance. Comments in this regard should include
documentation or other information supporting the conclusion that use
of ``Tracy'' on a wine label could cause consumers and vintners to
attribute to the wine in question the quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of wine made from grapes grown in the proposed Tracy
Hills viticultural area.
Submitting Comments
Please submit your comments by the closing date shown above in the
notice. Your comments must include this notice number and your name and
mailing address. Your comments must be legible and written in language
acceptable for public disclosure. We do not acknowledge receipt of
comments, and we regard all comments as originals.
[[Page 72738]]
You may submit comments in one of five ways:
Mail: You may send written comments to TTB at the address
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile
transmission to 202-927-8525. Faxed comments must--
(1) Be on 8.5- by 11-inch paper;
(2) Contain a legible, written signature; and
(3) Be no more than five pages long. This limitation assures
electronic access to our equipment. We will not accept faxed comments
that exceed five pages.
E-mail: You may e-mail comments to nprm@ttb.gov. Comments
transmitted by electronic mail must--
(1) Contain your e-mail address;
(2) Reference this notice number on the subject line; and
(3) Be legible when printed on 8.5- by 11-inch paper.
Online Form: We provide a comment form with the online
copy of this notice on our Web site at http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ``Send comments via e-mail'' link under
this notice number.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: To submit comments to us via
the Federal e-rulemaking portal, visit http://www.regulations.gov and
follow the instructions for submitting comments.
You may also write to the Administrator before the comment closing
date to ask for a public hearing. The Administrator reserves the right
to determine, in light of all circumstances, whether to hold a public
hearing.
Confidentiality
All submitted material is part of the public record and subject to
disclosure. Do not enclose any material in your comments that you
consider confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure.
Public Disclosure
You may view copies of this notice, the petition, the appropriate
maps, and any comments we receive by appointment at the TTB Library at
1310 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20220. You may also obtain copies at
20 cents per 8.5- x 11-inch page. Contact our librarian at the above
address or by telephone at 202-927-2400 to schedule an appointment or
to request copies of comments.
For your convenience, we will post this notice and any comments we
receive on this proposal on the TTB Web site. We may omit voluminous
attachments or material that we consider unsuitable for posting. In all
cases, the full comment will be available in the TTB Library. To access
the online copy of this notice and the submitted comments, visit http://www.ttb.gov/alcohol/rules/index.htm.
Select the ``View Comments'' link
under this notice number to view the posted comments.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this proposed regulation, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed regulation imposes no new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other administrative requirement. Any benefit derived
from the use of a viticultural area name would be the result of a
proprietor's efforts and consumer acceptance of wines from that area.
Therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866, 58 FR 51735. Therefore, it requires
no regulatory assessment.
Drafting Information
N.A. Sutton of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
Proposed Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we propose to amend 27
CFR, chapter 1, part 9, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
2. Amend subpart C by adding Sec. 9.---- to read as follows:
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
Sec. 9.---- Tracy Hills
(a) Tracy Hills. The name of the viticultural area described in
this section is ``Tracy Hills''. For purposes of part 4 of this
chapter, ``Tracy Hills'' is a term of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved Maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundary of the Tracy Hills viticultural area are five United States
Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale topographic maps. They are titled:
(1) Tracy, Calif., 1954, photorevised 1981;
(2) Vernalis, Calif., 1991;
(3) Solyo, Calif., 1953, photorevised 1971, photoinspected 1978;
(4) Lone Tree Creek, Calif., 1955, photorevised 1971; and
(5) Midway Calif., 1953, photorevised 1980.
(c) Boundary. The Tracy Hills viticultural area is located in
southwestern San Joaquin County and northwestern Stanislaus County. The
boundary of the Tracy Hills viticultural area is defined as follows--
(1) The point of beginning is on the Tracy map at the intersection
of the Delta-Mendota Canal and Lammers Ferry Road, along the western
boundary line of section 6, T3S/R5E. From that point, proceed 0.4 mile
generally southeast along the Delta-Mendota Canal to its intersection
with the Western Pacific railway line along the southern boundary line
of section 6, T3S, R5E (Tracy map); then
(2) Proceed 5.6 miles straight east along the Western Pacific
railway line and then along Linne Road to the intersection of Linne
Road and Lehman Road, along the northern boundary line of section 12,
T3S, R5E (Vernalis map); then
(3) Proceed 1.5 miles straight south and then east along Lehman
Road to its intersection with Bird Road at the southeast corner of
section 12, T3S, R5E (Vernalis map); then
(4) Proceed 1 mile straight south along Bird Road to its
intersection with Durham Ferry Road at the southeast corner of section
13, T3S, R5E (Vernalis map); then
(5) Proceed 1.9 miles straight east along Durham Ferry Road to its
intersection with State Highway 33 along the northern boundary line of
section 20, T3S, R6E (Vernalis map); then
(6) Proceed 5.1 miles straight southeast along State Highway 33,
passing the hamlet of Vernalis, to the highway's intersection with
McCracken Road along the eastern boundary of section 2, T4S, R6E (Solyo
map); then
(7) Proceed 3.4 miles straight south along McCracken Road to its
intersection with Hamilton Road at the southeast corner of section 23,
T4S, R6E (Solyo map); then
(8) Proceed 2.4 miles straight west along the southern boundary
lines of sections 23, 22 and 21, T4S, R6E, crossing the Delta-Mendota
Canal and the California Aqueduct, to the junction of the southern
boundary of section 21, the 500-foot elevation line, and the western-
most transmission line, (Solyo map); then
(9) Proceed 4.2 miles generally northwest along the meandering 500-
foot elevation line to section 18, T4S, R6E, where the 500-foot
elevation line crosses all of the transmission lines and
[[Page 72739]]
then continues northwest a short distance to the eastern-most
transmission line in the northwest quadrant of section 18, T4S, R6E,
(Solyo map); then
(10) Proceed 8.45 miles straight northwest along the eastern-most
transmission line, crossing from the Solyo map, over the Lone Tree
Creek map, to the Tracy map, and continue to the transmission line's
intersection with the western boundary of section 19, T3S, R5W, about
0.7 mile north-northeast of Black Butte (Tracy map); then
(11) Proceed in a straight line 2 miles northwest to the line's
intersection with the 500-foot elevation line, immediately north of an
unimproved road, at about the mid-point of the western boundary line of
section 12, T3S, R4E (Tracy map); then
(12) Proceed 0.65 mile straight north along with western boundaries
of section 12 and section 3 to the section line's intersection with
Interstate 580, section 3, T3S, R4E (Tracy map); then
(13) Proceed 0.8 mile straight northwest along Interstate 580
highway to its intersection with the Western Pacific railway in section
2, T3S, R4E (Midway map); then
(14) Proceed easterly 0.7 mile along the Western Pacific railway to
its intersection with the eastern boundary line of section 2, T3S, R4E
(Tracy map); and
(15) Proceed east for 1 mile in a straight line, returning to the
point of beginning at the intersection of Delta-Mendota Canal and
Lammers Ferry Road (Tracy map).
Signed: November 3, 2005.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 05-23681 Filed 12-6-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P