Animal Improvement Programs Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
ARS Publication Page
Scientific Presentations
Popular Press Publications
DHI Reports
 

Research Project: IMPROVING GENETIC PREDICTION OF ECONOMIC MERIT OF DAIRY ANIMALS

Location: Animal Improvement Programs

Title: Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length

Authors

Submitted to: Journal of Dairy Science
Publication Type: Abstract
Publication Acceptance Date: March 8, 2007
Publication Date: July 8, 2007
Citation: Norman, H.D., Wright, J.R., Cole, J.B. 2007. Effect of temperature and humidity on gestation length. Journal of Dairy Science. 90(Suppl. 1):16(abstr. M38).

Technical Abstract: High temperature and humidity have been shown to suppress daily milk and component yields of dairy cows, but their effects on most other performance traits have not been investigated. To determine if monthly differences in GL are caused by temperature and humidity, meteorological data since 1997 recorded at 238 weather stations was used in conjunction with national data for nearly 7 million calvings from 1999 through 2005. Temperature and relative humidity recorded at the weather station closest to the herd were combined into temperature-humidity indexes (THI): THI = (1.8T + 32) ¿ (0.55 ¿ 0.0055H)(1.8T ¿ 28), where T is temperature in °C and H is relative humidity expressed as a percentage, for the week prior to calving and for calving day. Effect of weekly and calving-day THI on GL were compared with a model that accounted for THI, calving day, calving year, calving herd-year, calving month, age-parity, calf birth code (gender and multiple-birth status), lactation length, milk yield, service sire, sire, and cow. All effects were fixed except service sire, sire, and cow. Effect of THI on GL without calving month in the model also was examined. When weekly THI was 36 to 40, 56 to 60, and 76 to 80 with calving month in the model, GL was 279.7, 279.5, and 279.1 d, respectively; without calving month in the model, GL was 280.2, 279.8, and 278.6 d. Excluding calving month from the model resulted in greater variation in GL, which became shorter at an accelerated rate as THI increased. Calving-day THI were less effective than weekly THI in accounting for GL differences. Although the benefit of including THI in the model was rather limited if calving month was already considered, GL still became noticeably shorter when THI was >70. Either calving month or THI can be effective in helping to predict calving dates.

   

 
Project Team
Norman, H - Duane
Van Tassell, Curtis - Curt
Vanraden, Paul
Wiggans, George
Cole, John
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Food Animal Production (101)
 
 
Last Modified: 11/05/2008
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House