Reviewing Your Application
Many Reviewers Worldwide
Before you submit your application, try to visualize the various reviewers
as they evaluate your application. If you are a Chicago-based organization
that promotes the widget industry and your proposal focuses on Japan and
Korea, for example, ITA professionals posted in Tokyo, Seoul, Chicago,
and Washington, DC, will all be reading your application and referring
to it in their comments to their colleagues.
Sequential Numbering
Each page of the application, from the executive summary to the last page
of the appendices, should be numbered sequentially. Such numbering is
a great help to the reviewers, even if the numbers are hand-written. Whether
you submit electronically or we scan your hard copy, sequential numbering
ensures that reviewers consider your application in the sequence you intended.
It also makes electronic searching of scanned documents match the hard
copy.
Include Support Letters in the Application Body
As discussed in the guidelines
on this subject, the best way to ensure that any letters of support have
the positive impact you intend is to include them in your application.
This way, ITA reviewers around the world all have access to these letters
and can all find them in the same place.
Be Judicious About Volume
Sometimes less is more. While it is usually important that reviewers get
a flavor of the types of activities and initiatives you have undertaken
in the past, including in your application a copy of all of the promotional
material for each one of these is usually not necessary. It may even be
counter-productive as reviewers struggle to determine which pages in your
application are really necessary to focus on. Try to consider more efficient
ways of communicating your competency and experience. For example, a table
summarizing your initiatives for the past five years could communicate
your experience more effectively on one page than 30 pages of brochures
and promotional literature could. An example of one brochure or promotional
piece is often enough to add all the credibility you would need to back
up a summary table.
|