U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Inspector General
Office of Audit

[ GRAPHIC ]

[ Search ]

Last Updated:

NEVADA DETR YEAR 2000 GRANT EXPENDITURES

Information obtained from the Internet may not be in the same format as a hard copy obtained from the Office. Depending on the requester, the quantity of information provided may also vary. In order to appeal any deleted information received via the Internet, you must make a formal written request for the same material. Further, some of the audit reports issued prior to FY 1998 may no longer be available. They may have been destroyed in accordance with our records retnetion schedule. However, any request for audit reports or other audit materials should be sent to the OIG, Disclosure Officer, Room S1303, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D. C. 20210.

Unless otherwise stated, the audit reports provided on this web page reflect the findings of the OIG at the time that the audit report was issued. The auditee may have more current information available as a result of audit resolution activities.

The OIG is using Adobe Acrobat 4.0 to prepare its audit reports for the internet. If you experience problems accessing the PDF files, you may want to download the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat Reader by clicking on the link provided.

[ Link to Acrobat 4.0 Reader ]

ETA awarded the Nevada Department of Employment, Training and Rehabilitation (DETR) grants totaling $8.1 million. To determine whether grant funds were expended for intended purposes, and in conformity with the grant agreement and applicable Federal requirements, the OIG audited $7.4 million expended by the DETR from the inception of the grants through September 30, 2000.

We identified expenditures totaling $758,427 that were not in accordance with grants requirements. Expenditures of $568,298 were questioned because the costs were incurred prior to the effective date of the pertinent grant, and $190,129 was questioned because the expenditures were for multiple tasks, only some of which were related to Y2K readiness. We recommended ETA recover the $758,427 that was misspent and ensure DETR improve its accounting procedures so that it may adequately identify allocable DOL grant expenditures.

DETR acknowledged the correctness of $262,509 costs questioned because they were incurred before the effective date of the grant, but believes the balance of $305,789 is allowable because the deliverables were accepted by DETR after the grant's effective date. OIG does not accept this position because the work on the deliverables was performed prior to the effective date of the grant. DETR also suggested that half of the questioned costs involving multiple tasks should not have been questioned. The DETR accounting system could not support this position, however, and the OIG recommendation remains unchanged.

(OA Report No. 04-01-004-03-315, issued March 19, 2001)

[ Get Complete Report PDF  ]

REPORTS BY FISCAL YEAR

[ 2001 Reports ]

[ 2000 Reports ]

[ 1999 Reports ]

[ 1998 Reports ]

[ Prior to 1998 ]


GO TO --

[ Audit Reports ]

[ FOIA ]

[ Semiannual Reports ]

[ Single Audit Information ]

[ Staff Listings ]

[ OIG Hotline ]


[ Privacy and Security Statement ]

[ DISCLAIMER ]

Send technical comments to: [ Webmaster@oig.dol.gov. ]

Comments relating to policy, content or style should be directed to:
[ rpts-coordinator@oig.dol.gov ]

[ OA Home Page ]

[ DOL Home Page ]

[ OIG Home Page ]

[ Top of Document ]