Your browser doesn't support JavaScript. Please upgrade to a modern browser or enable JavaScript in your existing browser.
Skip Navigation U.S. Department of Health and Human Services www.hhs.gov
Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
www.ahrq.gov


Figure 5. Tests Using Urine Specimens in Women

Graph showing sensitivity and specificity of tests using women's urine specimens. Go to Text Description [D] for details.

[D] Select for Text Description.

Data Key:

1. SDA (Chan, 2000): Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 99.2%
2. SDA (Van der Pol, 2001): Asymptomatic—Sensitivity = 86.5%, Specificity = 99.3%
3. SDA (Van der Pol, 2001): Symptomatic—Sensitivity = 83.7%, Specificity = 99.6%
4. TMA (Gaydos, 2003): Asymptomatic—Sensitivity = 87.5%, Specificity = 99.5%
5. TMA (Gaydos, 2003): Symptomatic—Sensitivity = 92.6%, Specificity = 99.1%
6. PCR (Crotchfelt, 1997): Sensitivity = 90.0%, Specificity = 95.9%
7. PCR (Martin, 2000): Sensitivity = 64.8%, Specificity = 99.8%
8. PCR (Van Doornum, 2001): Sensitivity = 66.7%, Specificity = 98.6%
9. PCR (Chan, 2000): Sensitivity = 100%, Specificity = 98.4%.

Notes: PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SDA, strand displacement amplification; TMA, transcription-mediated amplification.

Proceed to Figure 6
Return to Document

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care