Jump to main content.


Research Project Search
 Enter Search Term:
   
 NCER Advanced Search

1999 Progress Report: Social Impact Assessment of Human Exposure to Mercury Related to Land Use and Physicochemical Settings in the Alabama-Mobile River System

EPA Grant Number: R827168
Title: Social Impact Assessment of Human Exposure to Mercury Related to Land Use and Physicochemical Settings in the Alabama-Mobile River System
Investigators: Bonzongo, Jean-Claude J. , Bryan, Hobson C. , Chaubey, Indrajeet , Lyons, W. Berry , Roden, Eric E. , Ward, Milton G.
Current Investigators: Bonzongo, Jean-Claude J. , Bryan, Hobson C. , Chaubey, Indrajeet , Lyons, W. Berry , Roden, Eric E. , Ward, Milton G. , Warner, Kimberly A.
Institution: University of Alabama at Birmingham , Austin College
Current Institution: University of Alabama at Birmingham , Ohio State University - Main Campus , University of Arkansas at Little Rock , University of Florida
EPA Project Officer: Stelz, Bill
Project Period: December 21, 1998 through December 20, 2001
Project Period Covered by this Report: December 21, 1998 through December 20, 1999
Project Amount: $804,534
RFA: Water and Watersheds (1998)
Research Category: Water and Watersheds

Description:

Objective:

The southeastern region of the United States, mainly its Coastal Plain portion, is believed to be particularly vulnerable to mercury contamination in aquatic food chains, due to the coexistence of both natural- and human-imposed conditions, which favor the production/accumulation of methyl-mercury. We have hypothesized that certain urban/suburban activities, as well as some natural physicochemical conditions could favor mercury methylation and its accumulation in food chains. The objectives of this study are to: (1) determine concentrations and mercury species in water, sediments, and fish samples obtained from different aquatic systems in the Mobile Alabama River Basin (MARB); (2) investigate the impact of land use types and that of wetlands within watersheds on microbial processes associated with methyl-mercury production; (3) use GIS to represent spatially arranged data and ultimately to predict mercury levels in fish; and (4) use a participatory approach to environmental decisionmaking to ameliorate conflict, and to conduct a social and economic impact assessment of remedial alternatives as a basis for potential recommendations.

Progress Summary:

During the period covered by this report, we have been able to make progress on all aspects of our project. Related achievements are summarized below.

Sampling Sites Selection and Characterization: The following approach was used to select our sampling sites. First, based on expert knowledge of Alabama's resident fishermen, the site selection process was streamlined. Second, information obtained from resident fishermen was then verified using digital land use maps. This approach resulted in the selection of 54 sites. So far, watershed boundaries for major four sub-basins within the MARB have been delineated and land use maps for these basins have been developed.

Mercury Analysis: Meeting the above-stated objectives requires the analysis of a large number of water, sediment, and fish samples. Accordingly, most of the period covered by this report was spent upgrading our mercury analytical facility. Total and methyl-Hg determinations are being conducted presently on fish samples and sediment slurries from laboratory experiments.

Sample Collection and Public Participation: Following both the selection of sites and the upgrade of our mercury laboratory, we started the collection of fish samples. Fish samples were collected through the assistance of different Bass Clubs. Fish caught from our selected sites by Bass Club members were turned in to us at the tournament weigh-in. This sample collection approach of involving experts from the public has had a dual benefit of streamlining the fish tissue collection effort and informing a significant stakeholder, the recreational fisherman. In Year 2, we anticipate using electrofishing boats in addition to the above-mentioned approach to augment fish collection and access remote sites that will not be fished through Bass Clubs. With regard to the public information and participation aspects of our project, we have generated an extensive list of primary stakeholders to approach for issues-identification. Many organizations have been contacted to introduce the research topic and to determine opportunities for informing their membership. Finally, tools for public outreach have been established. The first is a bulletin, the Mercury News, designed to present the project to stakeholder groups. The second is a message-oriented telephone line, the Mercury Project line. Finally, a Web site is currently under construction.

Database Development: We are developing a spatial relational database that will be linked with the GIS coverages of watershed characteristics. Data from this study as well as those obtained from other available sources are being incorporated in this database. We are designing queries using spatial query language (SQL) to obtain information about mercury concentration in fish, water, and sediment as well as land use and other watershed characteristics. The database will have reports to display query results that can be used by researchers and stakeholders.

Experimental Studies of Mercury Biotransformation and Associated Microbial Processes: After review of the cost and difficulty of obtaining radiolabelled 14C-MeHgI and 203Hg(II), we decided to conduct our studies of microbial transformation of mercury in sediment using cold spikes. This approach is based on published methods in which HgX2 and CH3HgX are used in methylation and demethylation assays, respectively. Results from preliminary experiments are given below.

Future Activities:

During Year 2, we will continue our extensive fish sample collection. At the same time, we will continue the identification of stakeholders and informal meetings with stakeholder representatives. These will be "issue-sharing and issue-linking" meetings between scientists and stakeholders to review concerns, clarify positions, and to make connections among different issues and perspectives.

Following completion of our survey of mercury concentrations in fish tissue from our 54 sites, we will select a limited number of sites with contrasting levels of mercury in fish for intensive mercury and sediment biogeochemical studies.

Meanwhile, further laboratory experiments will continue to explore whether the transition to different electron accepting conditions results in changes in relative rates of methyl-mercury production and consumption. We also will examine whether changes in carbon or electron donor availability during transition to various electron-accepting conditions influence rates of mercury transformation.

We will continue to develop GIS-coverages for the watersheds where fish samples are and will be collected. We also will work with the database development and linking the database to the GIS-coverages. Finally, we plan to start working on a spatial GIS-based model that will link land use activities with mercury transport at the watershed scale.

Journal Articles:

No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 26 publications for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

watersheds, southeast U.S., Alabama, mercury, social science, biogeochemistry, GIS. , Water, Geographic Area, Scientific Discipline, RFA, Water & Watershed, Biology, Ecology, Mercury, Ecological Risk Assessment, Chemistry, Wet Weather Flows, Hydrology, Watersheds, Environmental Chemistry, Agronomy, State, runoff, soils, water quality, aquatic ecosystem, aquatic, fate and transport, methylmercury, public policy, watershed, bioaccumulation, methylation, agricultural discharges, land management, Alabama (AL), citizen perceptions, GIS, aquatic degradation, urban runoff, watershed influences, anthropogenic stress, social impact assessment, methylization of mercury, mercury content, biogeochemical cycling, food chain, mercury cycling

Progress and Final Reports:
Original Abstract
2001 Progress Report
Final Report

Top of page

The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.