U.S. Department of Labor Mine Safety and Health Administration Protecting Miners' Safety and Health Since 1978 |
www.msha.gov |
Find It! in DOL | Compliance Assistance | |
[Federal Register: February 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 27)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 7635-7655] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Part II Department of Labor ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine Safety and Health Administration ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 30 CFR Parts 49 and 75 Mine Rescue Teams; Final Rule ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Mine Safety and Health Administration 30 CFR Parts 49 and 75 RIN 1219-AB53 Mine Rescue Teams AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), Labor. ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The final rule revises MSHA's existing standards for mine rescue teams for underground coal mines. This final rule implements Section 4 of the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response (MINER) Act of 2006 to improve overall mine rescue capability; to improve mine emergency response time and mine rescue team effectiveness; and to increase the quantity and quality of mine rescue team training. DATES: Effective date: February 8, 2008. Compliance dates: Each mine operator shall comply with the following sections by the dates listed below. 1. Sec. 49.12(h) by May 8, 2008. 2. Sec. 49.12(f) and Sec. 75.1501(a)(2) by August 8, 2008. 3. Sec. 49.40 by November 10, 2008. 4. Sec. Sec. 49.18(b), 49.20(a), 49.20(b), 49.30, and 49.50 by February 9, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia W. Silvey, Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances, MSHA, at silvey.patricia@dol.gov (internet e-mail), 202-693-9440 (voice), or 202-693-9441 (facsimile). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Outline of the Preamble I. Introduction II. Statutory and Rulemaking Background III. Section-by-Section Analysis A. Technical Amendments to Existing Standards B. Subpart B--Mine Rescue Teams for Underground Coal Mines; Amendments to Existing Requirements C. Subpart B--Mine Rescue Teams for Underground Coal Mines; Additional MINER Act Provisions IV. Regulatory Economic Analysis A. Executive Order 12866 B. Population at Risk C. Costs D. Benefits V. Feasibility A. Technological Feasibility B. Economic Feasibility VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act A. Definition of a Small Mine B. Factual Basis for Certification VII. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 VIII. Other Regulatory Considerations A. The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 B. The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act of 1999: Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families C. Executive Order 12630: Government Actions and Interference With Constitutionally Protected Property Rights D. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform E. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use I. Executive Order 13272: Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking I. Introduction This final rule implements Section 4 of the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response (MINER) Act of 2006. MSHA's objective, consistent with the MINER Act, is to develop a final rule that fosters an environment that results in more preparation for mine rescue and mine emergency response. The final rule, like the proposal, retains all existing standards as subpart A applicable to underground metal and nonmetal mines. The MINER Act is not applicable to metal and nonmetal mines. The final rule creates a new, separate, subpart B containing existing standards and MINER Act provisions for underground coal mines. MSHA developed this final rule based on the provisions of the MINER Act, Agency data and experience, testimony at the public hearings, and the comments on the proposed rule. MSHA is providing delayed compliance dates for some sections to give mine operators the time needed to comply with the stated requirements. 1. By May 8, 2008, each mine operator must send the District Manager a statement describing the mine's method of providing mine rescue coverage in accordance with Sec. 49.12(h). 2. By August 8, 2008--
In accordance with section 115(e) of the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (Mine Act), MSHA issued standards in 30 CFR part 49 for mine rescue teams in underground coal and metal and nonmetal mines (45 FR 47002, July 11, 1980). Part 49 contains requirements addressing the three essential elements of effective mine rescue teams: (1) Ready availability; (2) proper equipment; and (3) basic levels of skills and training. After several underground coal mine disasters in 2006, Congress passed and the President signed the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response (MINER) Act of 2006, which became effective on June 15, 2006. The goal of the MINER Act is ``to improve the safety of mines and mining.'' Section 4 of the MINER Act requires that the Secretary issue regulations for mine rescue teams by December 2007. Because the mine rescue team provisions contained in section 4 of the MINER Act apply only to underground coal mines, the final rule affects those mines and the mine rescue teams that cover them. MSHA published the proposed rule for Mine Rescue Teams in the Federal Register on September 6, 2007 (72 FR 51320). The Agency held four public hearings on October 23, 2007, in Salt Lake City, Utah; on October 25, 2007, in Lexington, Kentucky; on October 30, 2007, in Charleston, West Virginia; and on November 1, 2007, in Birmingham, Alabama. In response to a request from the public, MSHA extended the comment period from November 9, 2007, to November 16, 2007. This action allowed commenters sufficient time to review the posted transcripts and submit comments. III. Section-by-Section Analysis MSHA developed this final rule based on the provisions of the MINER Act, Agency experience, testimony at the public hearings, and the comments on the proposed rule. A. Technical Amendments to Existing Standards This final rule makes no substantive change to requirements for mine rescue teams at underground metal and nonmetal mines; however, it makes the following non-substantive organizational changes to 30 CFR part 49.
Subpart B contains all the standards applicable to mine rescue teams for underground coal mines. The final rule revises existing standards to implement the provisions and achieve the goals of the MINER Act, and to address the unique conditions present in anthracite coal mines. The final rule also revises existing Sec. 75.1501(a) in 30 CFR part 75 to implement a MINER Act requirement. Subpart B contains the following five new standards: Sec. 49.20 Requirements for all coal mines. Sec. 49.30 Requirements for small coal mines. Sec. 49.40 Requirements for large coal mines. Sec. 49.50 Certification of coal mine rescue teams. Sec. 49.60 Requirements for a local mine rescue contest. 1. New Subpart B and the Reorganization of Part 49 The final rule, like the proposal, retains all existing standards as subpart A applicable to underground metal and nonmetal mines and creates a new, separate, subpart B containing existing standards and the MINER Act provisions for underground coal mines. In the proposal, MSHA requested comments on the re-organization of 30 CFR part 49. Commenters supported the re-organization and thought that it was beneficial in eliminating confusion. A commenter expressed concern regarding use of separate standards for different industries and urged MSHA to be cautious of this approach. MSHA's approach in the final rule is consistent with the Agency's longstanding practice of having separate standards for different industries. MSHA also requested comments on whether the proposal would result in different approaches to providing mine rescue services and, if so, what those approaches would be. Commenters expressed a variety of concerns, most related to team composition and training at each covered mine. 2. Section 49.11 Purpose and Scope The final rule, like the proposal, adds the phrase, ``as amended by the Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006,'' to update Sec. 49.11 Purpose and scope. This change is a technical amendment. The final rule also designates the existing provision as paragraph (a) and adds a new paragraph (b). Paragraph (b) contains Table 49.11, which provides mine operators a summary of new MINER Act requirements. As noted following the table, state employees, whose primary job duties include (1) inspecting underground mines for compliance with state safety laws, (2) training mine rescue teams, or (3) other similar duties that would enhance their mine rescue knowledge, can substitute their regular job experience for 50 percent of the annual training requirements, including mine rescue contests and mine-site training. MSHA requested comments on allowing State employees on mine rescue teams to substitute their job experience for 50 percent of the annual training requirements. Most commenters agreed that job duties can substitute for some of the required training. One commenter suggested that job experience should substitute for all training requirements. Some commenters stated that all mine rescue team members should be allowed to substitute job experience for training requirements. Several commenters stated that individual job duties should not be allowed to substitute for any mine rescue team training for any mine rescue team members. State employees on mine rescue teams involved in full-time inspection and mine rescue training activities have developed an expertise that will enhance mine rescue team emergency response capabilities. They are dedicated professionals who are familiar with mines they cover and knowledgeable about mine rescue and other areas of mine safety and health training. On a daily basis, they are exposed to a variety of mining environments, complex conditions, different problems, and new issues. This affords them a broad perspective into the safety and health objectives pertaining to mine rescue and mine rescue training. MSHA recognizes the knowledge and experience state employees on mine rescue teams gain in the performance of their jobs. MSHA agrees with the commenters supporting the note to Table 49.11. Under the final rule, full-time state employees on mine rescue teams must complete at least 48 hours of refresher training annually, including participation in at least one local mine rescue contest and training at each covered mine at least once every year. 3. Section 49.12 Availability of Mine Rescue Teams (a) Sec. 49.12(b) Alternative Composition Requirements for Mine Rescue Teams for Anthracite Coal Mines The final rule, like the proposal, includes requirements for mine rescue teams serving underground anthracite coal mines with no electrical equipment at the working section. The final rule is derived from petitions for modification, which MSHA has historically granted under section 101(c) of the Mine Act, because mining methods and conditions in underground anthracite coal mines are unique. For these mines, MSHA requires mine rescue teams to be comprised of three members each and one alternate team member to serve both teams. In support of these petitions, anthracite mine operators cited the following:
Considering this confirmation and the narrow width and constricted openings, the limited capacity of hoist conveyances, the pitched seam, the short travel distance from the slope bottom to the working face, and the low combustibility of anthracite coal, petitioner's alternative method of two mine rescue teams with three members each is as safe as maintaining two teams of five members. As such, it achieves the result of the standard to ensure the availability of mine rescue capability for purposes of emergency rescue and recovery. On the basis of the petitions and the findings of its investigations, MSHA granted 22 petitions for modification of Sec. 49.2(b) that allow anthracite coal mines to operate under the approved alternate method. Currently, 10 underground anthracite coal mines operate under this approved alternative method. Most anthracite mines are small (average 5 employees) and could not have their own mine site teams, are located in the same geographical area, and belong to an association called ``Anthracite Underground Rescue'' (AUGR). AUGR and the Pennsylvania Bureau of Mine Safety (Bureau) have an agreement for mine rescue training. AUGR provides qualified miners to be trained in mine rescue and the State provides a mine rescue station, equipment, and a trainer. These teams cover all the anthracite mines. Commenters supported this provision. One commenter stated that the proposed alternative does not benefit two small anthracite mines that have electrical face equipment and they can not realistically start their own company teams. This commenter urged MSHA to consider these teams as composite, but not require team members from each covered mine. The final rule does not expand the proposed provision to underground anthracite coal mines with electrical equipment at the face or working section. This final provision is consistent with MSHA's action on existing petitions for modification. (b) Sec. 49.12(c) Alternative Experience Requirement for Members of Contract Mine Rescue Teams The final rule, like the proposal and consistent with the MINER Act, requires that members of contract mine rescue teams have ``a minimum of 3 years underground coal mine experience that shall have occurred within the 10-year period preceding their employment on the contract mine rescue team.'' The final rule retains the existing provision that requires mine rescue team members to have been employed in an underground mine for at least 1 year within the past 5 years. MSHA received no comments on this provision. One commenter objected to allowing a surface employee who regularly works underground to claim such time to meet the experience requirement. The final rule retains this existing provision; the proposal did not address it. Another commenter asked that MSHA clarify what it means to work underground ``regularly.'' For the purpose of this provision, MSHA considers ``regularly works'' to mean that the member has recurring job duties at each mine, exposing the member to the mine's underground operations, conditions, and environment. For example, this may include surveyors, engineers, safety personnel, electricians, and maintenance and service personnel. Several commenters requested that MSHA waive this requirement for current mine rescue team members who are employed on the surface. Like the proposal, the final rule waives the underground experience requirement for those miners on a mine rescue team on February 8, 2008. 4. Sec. 49.12(f) Available Within 1 Hour Ground Travel Time From the Mine Rescue Station The final rule, like the proposal, includes the MINER Act requirement that no mine served by a mine rescue team shall be located more than 1 hour ground travel time from the mine rescue station with which the rescue team is associated. This provision will assure that a team will arrive at the mine more quickly in case of a mine emergency. MSHA received numerous comments on this proposal. Commenters questioned whether this provision would improve safety in an actual emergency. Commenters noted that there have been no instances where a team's arrival delayed a rescue operation and stated that the provision is not justified. Several commenters indicated that the proposal is infeasible for some western coal mines, which are geographically isolated. Likewise, some commenters indicated that rugged terrain in Central Appalachia hinders ground travel, making compliance difficult. A few commenters stated that the proposal will cause the relocation of stations further from some mine sites, disrupt current team coverage, and may result in mine closures. Many commenters indicated that a sufficient number of volunteers may not be available to form additional teams needed for new mine rescue stations. Commenters stated that the establishment of new and relocation of existing rescue stations is an unnecessary, burdensome expense, with no benefit to mine safety. Commenters suggested that MSHA grandfather existing mine rescue stations and current coverage arrangements. Commenters also suggested that MSHA allow the District Manager to grant waivers of the 1 hour ground travel time for existing teams and stations, but only up to 2 hours. Commenters also asked MSHA to consider alternatives, including the use of air transportation and emergency escorts. One commenter did not believe the 1-hour provision would cause undue hardship. One commenter stated that more rescue stations would likely be created, resulting in teams getting to the mines sooner. Consistent with the MINER Act, the final rule includes the 1-hour requirement. 5. Section 49.13 Alternative Mine Rescue Capability for Small and Remote Mines The final rule, like the proposal, retains the existing provision for alternative capability for small and remote mines. It requires that the operator's application include the total underground employment of any mines within 1 hour of the operator's mine, to be consistent with the 1-hour requirement of the MINER Act. It also requires that the operator include the location of the mine rescue station serving the mine. Commenters suggested alternatives that the District Manager should consider for small and remote mines. Other commenters stated that this provision should not be used to allow remote operations with large numbers of miners to circumvent the MINER Act requirement for two teams. For clarification, MSHA notes that this provision, which was in the existing standard, requires a mine to be both small and remote before it can file an application. 6. Section 49.14 [Reserved] The final rule, like the proposal, does not include this provision in subpart B because it is not applicable to underground coal mines. MSHA received no comments on this proposal. 7. Section 49.15(a) Mine Rescue Station The final rule, like the proposal, removes the exception related to alternative compliance. The final rule makes no change from the proposal. This final rule is consistent with the goals of the MINER Act. MSHA received no comments on this proposal. 8. Section 49.16(a) Alternative Equipment Requirement for Anthracite Mines The final rule, like the proposal, adds a provision to address underground anthracite coal mines that have no electrical equipment at the face or working section. Through the petition for modification (PFM) process, MSHA allows mine rescue teams for underground anthracite coal mines, which have no electrical equipment at the face or working section, to have three members for each team and one alternate to serve both teams. These operators have submitted petitions for modification to allow the mine rescue station to maintain eight self-contained oxygen breathing apparatus and eight cap lamps and a charging station, rather than twelve of each as required by the existing standard. On the basis of these petitions and the findings of its investigation, MSHA granted 17 petitions for modification of Sec. 49.6(a)(1) and (5) that allow each mine rescue station for anthracite coal mines to have eight self-contained oxygen breathing apparatus, eight cap lamps, and a charging rack, as the approved alternative method. Currently, 10 underground anthracite coal mines operate under this approved alternative method. The final rule requires that mine rescue stations covering anthracite coal mines that have no electrical equipment at the face or working section have at least the amount of equipment appropriate for the number of mine rescue team members, consistent with the action taken in existing petitions for modification. For three-person teams and one alternate, this would mean seven self-contained oxygen breathing apparatus and seven cap lamps. Under the final rule, equipment required per team, such as gas detectors, may not be reduced. No commenters objected to this provision, so long as it is consistent with the provisions in the petitions for modification. 9. Section 49.17 Physical requirements for Mine Rescue Team Like the proposed rule, the final rule maintains the existing physical requirements for mine rescue teams. Commenters suggested that MSHA modify the rule to allow the use of corrective glasses in determining distant visual acuity. Although MSHA considered this suggestion, it is beyond the scope of the rulemaking. 10. Section 49.18 Training for Mine Rescue Teams The final rule, like the proposed rule, retains the existing requirements. In the final rule, MSHA has removed obsolete language in Sec. 49.18(a) related to waiver of initial training. All existing teams meet the initial training requirement, making it unnecessary to waive. Like the proposal, the final rule adds paragraph (b)(6), which requires all mine rescue team members, at least once during each 12- month period, to participate in training that includes wearing mine rescue apparatus while in smoke, simulated smoke, or an equivalent environment. Commenters agreed that training in smoke afforded teams skills that would be useful in an actual mine emergency and that several mine rescue teams already perform this training. Although some mine operators or training facilities use actual smoke, operators can use a nontoxic theatrical smoke, which is harmless. For the purposes of this provision, an equivalent environment could include training with glasses or face shields that reduce vision and simulate smoke. This requirement assures that mine rescue team members train in realistic conditions. The final rule increases the 40-hour annual refresher training requirement to 96 hours from 64 hours in the proposed rule. This training must be provided at least 8 hours every 2 months. This increase is in response to comments and is consistent with the goals and objectives of the MINER Act and the recommendations of the Mine Safety Technology and Training Commission (Commission). Some commenters supported the existing requirement of 40 hours of annual training. These commenters generally were concerned that small mines do not have the resources to allow training during work hours and that an increase in this training could affect the mine rescue teams' ability to attract volunteers. Other commenters suggested 48 hours of annual training was appropriate. They suggested 8 hours of training every 2 months, for a total of 48 hours. They indicated that the increased training time may conflict with mine-site duties, which might preclude experienced miners from participating on rescue teams. Other commenters were not opposed to the proposed 64 hour training requirement. Several noted that their teams' annual training currently exceeds 64 hours. These commenters noted that the content and quality of this training is more important than the total number of training hours. They requested more flexibility in scheduling training, stating that some mine rescue training occurs irregularly, depending on weather conditions and contest schedules. Other commenters recommended that the annual training requirement be increased to a minimum of 96 hours, given at 8 hours each month. In support of this recommendation, they cited the Commission's report on Improving Mine Safety Technology and Training: Establishing U.S. Global Leadership (2006). The Commission, composed of members from a cross- section of the mining community, industry, labor, academia, government, including mine rescue practitioners, recommended a minimum of 96 hours of annual training, at 8 hours each month. One commenter also stated that participating in mine rescue contests should not be considered as part of this 96 hours of annual training. Based upon the comments, the Commission's report, and Agency data and experience, in the final rule MSHA has increased the amount of annual training to 96 hours. In making this decision, MSHA determined that additional annual refresher training is necessary to fully address all of the training requirements in the MINER Act. MSHA also agrees with commenters' suggestions and the Commission's report that additional training is necessary to adequately prepare for mine rescue team service. In addition, based on the Commission's recommendations and MSHA's experience, MSHA anticipates that this additional training will provide an incremental increase in safety for underground coal miners. Therefore, the final rule increases training from the proposed 64 to 96 hours. In addition to existing requirements, the MINER Act requires that team members be familiar with operations of covered mines, have knowledge of the operation and ventilation of covered mines, and train at covered mines. Also, teams under paragraph (b)(6) need to train in smoke, simulated smoke, or an equivalent environment once annually. In order to further improve their skills, teams may also participate in Mine Emergency Response Development (MERD) exercises or other practical simulation exercises, such as a fire or explosion drills. This type of training further enhances teams' skills in interacting with a command center. Recommended training could also include: first responder training, communications, mine gases, gas detectors, new technology, heat stress, and hazard training unique to the covered mines. In addition, skills training may include building temporary stoppings and seals, using a foam generator underground, and using an air lock to rescue survivors. This additional training will enhance teams' skills and abilities. The MINER Act also requires mine rescue team members to participate in two local mine rescue contests each year. The final rule will allow up to 16 hours of credit for participation in the two required mine rescue contests. Some commenters objected to including mine rescue contests as a part of the annual training requirement, while others favored such a requirement. Commenters stated that mine rescue contests are designed to increase rescue team skill levels and to facilitate interaction between various rescue teams. MSHA agrees. MSHA believes that mine rescue contests serve a vital role in achieving the purpose of the MINER Act to improve the safety of mines and mining. Historically, they have served to assure that mine rescue teams are well-trained and capable of responding to mine emergencies. Under existing Agency policy, MSHA allows up to 8 hours credit for mine rescue contests toward the annual training requirement. In recognition of the critical need for the team to travel efficiently from the mine rescue station to the covered mine, under the final rule, travel time can be counted toward fulfilling the 96 hour requirement. While the final rule increases the total amount of annual refresher training, it retains the requirement that the training occur at least 8 hours every 2 months. Taking into consideration comments that mine rescue training occurs irregularly, depending on weather conditions and contest schedules, MSHA decided not to reduce the flexibility of scheduling training. Based on MSHA data and experience, 8 hours of training every 2 months is necessary to avoid skills degradation. As the Commission's report states, The nation's mine rescue capability rests more heavily on training than on any other aspect of the mine emergency response system. Especially since emergency incidents are relatively rare, the predominant way teams keep their skills sharp, and develop cohesion, enthusiasm, and trust, is through training. The final rule, like the proposed rule and the existing standard, requires that the training courses be conducted by instructors who have been employed in an underground mine and have had a minimum of 1 year experience as a mine rescue team member or mine rescue instructor within the past 5 years. A commenter suggested that MSHA allow experienced underground miners to become instructors even though they do not have 1 year experience as a mine rescue team member. MSHA has not included this suggestion in the final rule to assure that mine rescue team members are instructed by persons with practical mine rescue experience. Mine rescue team instructors who have received MSHA approval prior to the effective date of the final rule would not have to meet this requirement. C. Subpart B--Mine Rescue Teams for Underground Coal Mines; Additional MINER Act Provisions 1. Section 75.1501(a) Person Knowledgeable in Mine Emergency Response The final rule, like the proposal, requires that the responsible person be trained annually in a course of instruction in mine emergency response. This provision implements the MINER Act requirement that the operator have a person employed on each shift who is knowledgeable in mine emergency response. The final rule requires that the responsible person be trained in a course prescribed by MSHA's office of Educational Policy and Development. The majority of commenters expressed concern that the proposal placed too much responsibility on one person. Some of these commenters thought that the proposal required the responsible person to conduct the activities listed in the proposal, rather than to be trained in those activities. Other commenters expressed concern that the proposal contained excessive training requirements and that the training areas listed were not sufficiently described. One commenter indicated that MSHA must establish and require a standard minimum curriculum along with recommended times for each topic. In response to comments, MSHA has clarified the final rule to require that the responsible person be trained in a course which includes topics listed in the rule. The rule does not establish any new duties for the responsible person. Further, in response to comments, the course for the responsible person will be based on a curriculum prescribed by MSHA and placed on the Agency's Web site. MSHA is developing this course in mine emergency response to assure consistent and comprehensive training. Commenters further requested that the final rule include a recommended duration of time for this training. In light of the fact that MSHA is developing the curriculum for this course, MSHA does not believe that it is either necessary or appropriate to specify a duration for this training. Consistent with other MSHA training requirements, the final rule, like the proposal, requires that the operator certify by signature and date after each responsible person has completed the training and that the certification be kept at the mine for 1 year. MSHA received no comments on this aspect of the proposal. 2. Section 49.20 Requirements for All Coal Mines The final rule addresses MINER Act provisions that are the same for all underground coal mine rescue teams, regardless of the size of the operation. It requires the operator to make available two certified mine rescue teams whose members are familiar with the operations of each coal mine covered by the mine rescue team, participate annually in two local mine rescue contests, and train at the covered mines. a. Section 49.20(a)(1) Familiarity With Operations of Covered Mines This final rule, like the proposal, requires two certified mine rescue teams whose members are familiar with the operations of the mine and participate at least annually in two local mine rescue contests. One commenter stated that while MSHA's understanding of ``familiarity'' is acceptable for the knowledge a miner would posses in order to safely perform job duties, it does not adequately describe the level of knowledge a mine rescue team member should posses in order to carry out rescue and recovery duties. Commenters indicated that familiarity with the covered mine was necessary but did not agree with the frequency of training at the covered mine. The final rule adopts the MINER Act requirement of ``familiarity'' with the operation of the coal mine. Under the final rule, MSHA considers ``familiarity'' with the operations of the covered mine as first-hand experience of the underground mining conditions and operations at a particular mine. Team members who do not work at the covered mine become familiar with its operations by participating in mine rescue training at the mine. Training at the mine may include: Identifying the designated escapeways, intakes, returns, the ventilation system, locations and types of fire fighting equipment, the communication system, mine-wide monitoring system, and the type of transportation equipment used at the mine. Also, team members need to be familiar with the location of stored SCSRs, lifelines, breathable air, hardened rooms, and other emergency response equipment or supplies. MSHA recognizes that the amount of time required to familiarize teams with a particular mine will vary, depending on mining conditions. For example, teams may need more time to become familiar with complex mines and newer team members may require more time to achieve this familiarity. For this reason, MSHA is not requiring a minimum amount of time for mine rescue team training underground at each covered mine. MSHA expects the operator to effectively evaluate each team member to determine the amount of training necessary for that person to become familiar with operations at the covered mine. MSHA expects that a portion of each required training session at the mine be conducted in the mine. b. Sec. 49.20(a)(2) Participation in Two Local Mine Rescue Contests Like the proposal, the final rule includes the MINER Act requirement that mine rescue team members participate in two local mine rescue contests annually. Commenters expressed concern with the criteria for, and quality of, mine rescue contests. They were concerned about the availability of acceptable contests. MSHA addresses commenters' concerns with criteria for mine rescue contests in the discussion of Sec. 49.60, which addresses requirements for a local mine rescue contest. Mine rescue contests are designed to sharpen skills and test the knowledge of team members who would be called on to respond to a mine emergency. Historically, mine rescue contests have provided individuals with practical, hands-on experience and are one of the most effective forms of training. Some team members who are regular participants in contests have been called on in recent years to perform actual mine rescue and recovery work. They have done so successfully and training exercises, such as mine rescue contests, were essential to maintaining a well-prepared team. A commenter stated that participation in two back-to-back contests is counterproductive because the teams need time to analyze and discuss in depth their performance during the contest. Contest judges evaluate teams and provide a written evaluation and score after each contest. Contest judges will evaluate each team and judge if the team demonstrates acceptable skills to be certified. A copy of the judge's evaluation will be submitted to the District Manager. MSHA expects that teams learn from constructive feedback and their experiences during contests. In response to this comment, MSHA has changed the proposed criteria for a local mine rescue contest in the final rule to clarify that a contest consists of one or more problems on one or more days with a determined winner. c. Sec. 49.20(b) Requirements for Types of Mine Rescue Teams The final rule, like the proposal, provides for four types of mine rescue teams, consistent with the MINER Act. In response to comments, MSHA has included clarifying changes in the final rule. Commenters generally expressed concern that the description of teams in the MINER Act did not adequately encompass the variety of arrangements for mine rescue service or the composition of mine rescue teams that are currently available to the mining community. Commenters indicated that this provision would disrupt existing mine rescue service, which would be contrary to the goals of the MINER Act. They cautioned that the proposal could result in: Disbanding experienced mine rescue teams; replacing experienced team members with inexperienced ones; inability to attract volunteers to join mine rescue teams; mines losing current coverage arrangements, and possibly mine closures. Commenters objected to the differences in training requirements for large and small mines. In particular, commenters expressed concern that the training differences between types of teams were illogical, requiring mine-site and state-sponsored teams to train more often at each covered small mine than at each covered large mine. Other commenters stated that mine size and complexity should determine the frequency of training at the covered mine, not the type of team. Commenters objected to the proposed requirement that composite teams from small mines need to include two miners from each covered mine. They were concerned about the ability of small mines to generate two volunteers due to their employment. They indicated that small mines are less likely to be able to spare a miner to perform mine rescue training or service. A commenter, however, indicated that small mines should be required to have two team members on composite teams. Several commenters suggested allowing a company team, composed of miners who work for an operator of multiple mines, to be considered a mine-site team so they would not need to have two team members from each covered mine. Commenters also expressed concern that requiring two members from each covered mine may result in teams with too many members, creating logistical training problems and excessive costs. With regard to state-sponsored teams, several commenters suggested that teams composed of non-state employees who use mine rescue equipment and stations provided by the state be considered a state- sponsored or composite team instead of a contract team. Some commenters stated that State-sponsored composite team members should be considered state employees to get credit for the time in training at the mine in which they work. In response to commenters' concerns that the proposal did not effectively encourage the creation of new mine site teams, the final rule requires mine-site teams to train annually at each covered small mine. MSHA expects this change to encourage more mine-site teams. The final rule also requires state-sponsored teams to train annually instead of semi-annually at each covered small mine. Additionally, at small mines only, the final rule allows composite teams to have one member from each covered small mine. Also in response to comments, for the purpose of mine rescue team membership, a member employed by an operator of multiple mines is considered to be an employee of each mine at which the member regularly works. In this section, MSHA considers ``regularly works'' to mean that the member has recurring job duties at each mine, exposing the member to the mine's underground operations, ventilation, conditions, and environment. For example, these employees may include surveyors, engineers, safety personnel, electricians, and maintenance and service personnel. One commenter questioned the use of ``a'' covered mine in the proposal, believing that MSHA meant ``each'' covered mine. In response to this comment, the final rule includes the term ``each'' covered mine. d. Knowledge of Operations and Ventilation at the Covered Mine The final rule, like the proposal, requires members of mine rescue teams to have knowledge of the operations and ventilation at each covered mine. Generally, this would require each team to review the mine's ventilation maps, roof or ground control methods, emergency response plan, transportation, and communication system. e. Mine Rescue Team Training at Each Covered Mine The final rule, like the proposal, requires that members of mine rescue teams must participate in training at each covered mine, consistent with the MINER Act, MSHA interprets the intent of the MINER Act to require that at least a portion of the training at each covered mine must be conducted underground. Commenters objected to the requirement that teams train at each covered mine. They stated that this training is impractical, overly burdensome, unnecessary, and may negatively affect the ability to attract new team members. In particular, commenters indicated that travel and training time is excessive for contract teams. Several commenters suggested that, to alleviate this burden, team members be allowed to rotate training at each covered mine so that each team member trains at each covered mine at least annually. Some commenters suggested that only two members of each team be required to train at each covered mine and they would brief the team. A commenter suggested that, if the team does not complete training at each covered mine, the team should not be used as a first responder. Under the final rule, the number of training sessions required at the covered mine depends on the mine size and type of mine rescue team. The following chart illustrates the required number of training sessions at each covered mine. |
Table 1.--Frequency of Training for Mine Rescue Team Members at Each Covered Underground Coal Mine Each Year ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine size Type of team ------------------------------------------------------------- Large (more than 36) Small (36 or fewer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine Site......................................... 1 (annually)................ 1 (annually). Composite......................................... 2 (semi-annually)........... 2 (semi-annually). Contract.......................................... 4 (quarterly)............... 2 (semi-annually). State-sponsored................................... 1 (annually)................ 1 (annually). ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to comments, the final rule includes Sec. 49.20(d) to clarify that a portion of the training at each covered mine must be conducted underground. f. Integration of Mine Rescue Team Training Requirements The two new categories of training for mine rescue team members, participation in mine rescue contests and participation in training at the covered mines, complement the existing training. The final rule retains existing requirements for training sessions underground every 6 months; and the wearing of breathing apparatus for a minimum of 2 hours every 2 months. MSHA expects operators to integrate the new requirements, including mine rescue training at the covered mines, with the existing requirements. g. Section 49.20(c) Employee of Multiple Mines The final rule adds this paragraph in response to comments. Commenters requested that the Agency clarify, for mine rescue team purposes only, the employment status of an employee who works at multiple mines for a single operator. For the purpose of mine rescue team membership, this new provision allows a team member employed by an operator of multiple mines to be considered an employee of each mine at which the member regularly works. In this section, MSHA considers ``regularly works'' to mean that the member has recurring job duties at each mine, exposing the member to the mine's underground operations, conditions, and environment. For example, this may include surveyors, engineers, safety personnel, electricians, and maintenance and service personnel. 3. Section 49.30 Requirements for Small Coal Mines The final rule, like the proposal, requires that members of mine rescue teams covering a small mine know the operations and ventilation of the mine. In response to comments, MSHA clarifies that small coal mines applies to mines with 36 or fewer underground employees. Commenters asked MSHA to clarify how the Agency would determine employment for purposes of the rule. MSHA recognizes that a small mine's employment may fluctuate from time to time. MSHA expects operators to use data reported to MSHA for the quarterly employment and coal production report required in Sec. 50.30 to determine the number of underground employees working at a mine. 4. Section 49.40 Requirements for Large Coal Mines The final rule, like the proposal, requires that the mine operator of a large mine designate either an individual mine-site team or a composite team as one of the two mine rescue teams, consistent with the MINER Act. The second mine rescue team can be a mine-site, composite, contract, or State-sponsored team. MSHA clarifies that large coal mines applies to mines that have more than 36 underground employees. MSHA recognizes that a large mine's employment may fluctuate from time to time. MSHA expects operators to use the data reported to MSHA for the quarterly employment and coal production report required in Sec. 50.30 to determine the number of underground employees working at a mine. 5. Section 49.50 Certification of Mine Rescue Teams The final rule establishes criteria to certify the qualifications of mine rescue teams, consistent with the MINER Act. a. Sec. 49.50(a) Certification Criteria The final rule, like the proposal, requires that a mine operator certify that each of the mine's two designated mine rescue teams meet the requirements of this subpart. The certification criteria include a certification statement, equipment and training requirements, and the frequency of certification. As in the proposed rule, to be certified, the mine rescue team must be available when miners are underground and within 1 hour ground travel time from the mine rescue station to the mine; team members must be physically fit, experienced working in an underground mine, and properly trained; and the mine rescue station must be adequately equipped. The criteria for these qualifications are contained in the final rule. A commenter asked MSHA to clarify whether a mine rescue team member may complete an annual certification statement. Like the proposal, the final rule does not address who completes the annual certification statement. To comply with this requirement, the mine operator must certify and submit the annual certification statement to the District Manager. One commenter objected to operator certification of mine rescue teams because it does not provide for an objective review of a team's abilities. This commenter also expressed concern about MSHA's ``lifetime certification'' of mine rescue instructors and suggested that MSHA require instructors to demonstrate routinely their skill and understanding of mine rescue. The final rule provides that a local mine rescue contest is training that provides an objective evaluation of demonstrated mine rescue team skills. MSHA considers the evaluations of team performance at the two required local mine rescue contests to be an objective test and evaluation of a mine rescue team's abilities. In response to comments, MSHA has added a requirement in the certification table that judges must certify the results of the two local contests. This will serve to provide further evidence of an objective evaluation of a team's abilities. The final rule requires that contest judges complete annual training for mine rescue contest judges. As required by the final rule, a local mine rescue contest must use the National Mine Rescue Contest rules, or other rules recognized by MSHA. Contest judges receive comprehensive training on contest rules. At each contest, each mine rescue team has a problem. In general, judges use the following criteria to evaluate team performance: (1) Communication with team members; (2) Time taken to solve problem; (3) Accuracy of markings, e.g. on maps; (4) Team effectiveness in solving problem; (5) Team effectiveness in handling first responder activities, e.g. first-aid; and (6) Team's use of technology, e.g. testing for methane and other gasses. Teams receive discounts for mistakes, and an overall score. Periodically, MSHA will monitor mine rescue team instructor activities. When a judge finds that a team does not meet minimum skills, MSHA will audit the training and notify the District Manager. Based on this audit, MSHA may revoke the instructor's approval. For further ease of understanding, MSHA divided the proposed Table on Certification into two tables in the final rule. Table 49.50-A lists the initial criteria to certify the qualifications of mine rescue teams. Table 49.50-B lists the annual criteria to maintain mine rescue team certification. New teams will have to meet these requirements. In response to comments, this final rule includes an optional certification form that operators may use to assist them in complying with this section. This optional form is attached as an appendix to this rule. The form is posted on MSHA's Web site. MSHA will accept certification statements in all formats, both electronic and paper. (b) Sec. 49.50(b) District Manager Notification The final rule includes a new requirement that an operator must notify the District Manager within 60 days of any change in team membership. Commenters stated that the membership of each team is subject to change and questioned the impact of changes on team certification. MSHA clarifies that a team does not automatically lose its certification when a team replaces a member. Under the final rule, the operator has 60 days in which to notify the District Manager of any change so that MSHA can assure continued compliance. 6. Section49.60 Requirements for a Local Mine Rescue Contest The final rule, like the proposal, includes criteria for a local mine rescue contest. It also requires that, when requested, the mine operator must provide information to the District Manager concerning each designated team's schedule of participation in upcoming local mine rescue contests. Paragraph (a) of this section in the final rule requires that a local mine rescue contest is: conducted in the United States; uses MSHA recognized rules; has a minimum of 3 teams; and has one or more problems conducted on one or more days with a determined winner. With respect to the requirement that contests use MSHA-recognized rules, commenters stated that all contests should use MSHA National Contest rules; others indicated that contests should concentrate on the practical aspects of mine rescue and not focus on compliance with rules. Some said the contest rules may be too restrictive. Like the proposal, the final rule does not require contest organizers to use the National Mine Rescue Contest Rules; it allows other rules recognized by MSHA. Commenters wanted MSHA to clarify the term ``participate,'' as used in the proposal. As is existing practice, MSHA recognizes a team as participating when the team is present and competes. Also, in response to comments, MSHA will consider State-sponsored teams, whose members are full-time state employees, as participating in a local mine rescue contest when performing duties as contest judges or officials. One commenter supported the proposed requirement stating that this would allow companies to put on their own mine rescue contests and have intra-company training. Another commenter questioned whether permitting competitions with as few as three participating teams is adequate. As stated in the proposal, MSHA intends that requiring a minimum of three teams for a local mine rescue contest will encourage more contests among teams in close geographic proximity. Therefore, the final rule requires a minimum of three competing teams in a local mine rescue contest. Commenters indicated that participation in a mine rescue contest is an opportunity to demonstrate the results of training. Teams spend a lot of time preparing for contests. As stated in the proposal, teams must prepare to compete as if the contest were an actual mine emergency. MSHA agrees that preparation for a contest is a vital component of team training, along with the interaction with other teams and the evaluation provided by judges. Competing while being timed, observed, and judged creates a stressful environment that provides an effective forum for evaluating and testing the team's level of knowledge and skill under simulated mine emergency conditions. The ability to make effective decisions quickly, while under stress and wearing breathing apparatus, is a vital skill for each mine rescue team member to develop. Most commenters agreed that, in order for judges to administer the mine rescue contest fairly and provide appropriate and meaningful evaluations, judges should have a strong background in mine rescue. In addition, most commenters agreed that there should be prescribed areas of annual training for contest judges, but did not want a minimum required amount of time. Some stated that judges' training on the rules should address changes in the rules only. MSHA disagrees because training should always be comprehensive. This strengthens existing skills and knowledge and accommodates new judges. Some commenters indicated that persons with knowledge of mine rescue principles and practices and experienced in mine rescue should be allowed to serve as judges for local contests. Some said that only MSHA or State personnel should judge contests. A few commenters stated that judges should have actual mine rescue experience, preferably experience in an actual emergency. MSHA believes that the annual rules training is sufficient to adequately train judges. Paragraph (b) of this section in the final rule clarifies that a local mine rescue contest provides an objective evaluation of demonstrated mine rescue team skills. A number of commenters indicated that there are other simulated mine rescue team exercises that also enhance mine rescue skills and provide an evaluation of the team's performance. A few commenters expressed concern that MSHA proposed other simulated mine rescue team exercises as a substitute for a local mine rescue contest. A local mine rescue contest provides an objective evaluation of demonstrated mine rescue team skills. In response to these comments, the final rule clarifies that a MERD exercise or practical simulation exercise, such as a fire or explosion response exercise, can be a local mine rescue contest for purposes of this provision. MSHA recognizes that the benefit of preparing for a contest is as valuable as competing. Some commenters said that scheduling issues may preclude some mines from participating in two local mine rescue contests and that additional opportunities to participate in other types of simulated mine rescue exercises allows teams to satisfy this requirement. Two commenters stated that MSHA cannot allow substitution of other training for participation in local mine rescue contests because the MINER Act mandates that teams must participate at least annually in two local mine rescue contests. As stated previously, MSHA considers that participation in simulated mine rescue team exercises, where the members wear breathing apparatus, demonstrate mine rescue team skills, and receive an evaluation of team performance fosters an environment conducive to increased preparation for mine rescue and mine emergency response. As stated in the preamble to the proposed rule, MSHA considers actual underground participation in a rescue or recovery operation as a substitute for participation in a local mine rescue contest. The final rule requires mine operators to notify the appropriate District Manager, on request, when and where their designated teams plan to participate in mine rescue contests. This notice allows MSHA time to prepare for attending the contest and to provide assistance as necessary. This notice also allows MSHA to verify that the contest meets the requirements of this final rule. IV. Regulatory Economic Analysis A. Executive Order 12866 Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 as amended by E.O. 13258 (Amending Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review) requires that regulatory agencies assess both the costs and benefits of regulations. To comply with E.O. 12866, MSHA has prepared a Regulatory Economic Analysis (REA) for the final rule. The REA contains supporting data and explanation for the summary materials presented in this preamble, including the covered mining industry, costs and benefits, feasibility, small business impacts, and paperwork. The REA is located on MSHA's Web site at http://www.msha.gov/regsinfo.htm. A copy of the REA can be obtained from MSHA's Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances at the address in the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. Executive Order 12866 requires that regulatory agencies assess both the costs and benefits of significant regulatory actions. Under the Executive Order, a ``significant regulatory action'' is one meeting any of a number of specified conditions, including the following: Having an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, creating a serious inconsistency or interfering with an action of another, materially altering the budgetary impact of entitlements or the rights of entitlement recipients, or raising novel legal or policy issues. Based on the REA, MSHA has determined that the final rule does not have an annual effect of $100 million or more on the economy and that, therefore, it is not an economically ``significant regulatory action'' pursuant to section 3(f) of E.O. 12866. MSHA, however, has concluded that the final rule is otherwise significant under Executive Order 12866 because it raises novel legal or policy issues. B. Population at Risk The rule applies to 653 underground coal mines covering 42,597 miners and 8,250 (non-office) contractors. Table 2 shows summary data for underground coal mines. |
Table 2.--Summary Data for Underground Coal Mines -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Number of Number of Total number employees Annual revenue Annual cost Mine size \a\ mines of miners \b\ underground (billions) (millions) Cost per mine \b\ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1-19.................................................... 220 2,255 1,952 $0.3 $1.1 $5,200 20-500.................................................. 420 32,852 29,742 10.3 3.4 8,200 >500.................................................... 13 7,490 6,503 3.1 0.2 13,400 All Mines............................................... 653 42,597 38,197 13.7 4.8 7,400 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 3.--Summary of Total Yearly Cost of the Rule for Underground Coal Mine Operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine size Section ------------------------------------------------ Total yearly 1-19 20-500 501+ cost ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- One Hour from Mine Rescue Station to Mine \a\... $559,407 $292,982 $7,000 $859,390 Mine Rescue Team Training \b\................... 379,967 2,225,222 119,768 2,724,956 Mine Rescue Contests \c\........................ 91,915 552,810 30,037 674,762 Certification of Mine Rescue Teams \d\.......... 8,161 15,580 482 24,223 Responsible Person Training & Certification \e\. 95,047 362,906 16,849 474,803 --------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................................... 1,134,497 3,449,500 174,137 4,758,134 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 4.--Summary of Total Yearly Cost of the Final Rule for State Mine Rescue Teams ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine size Section ------------------------------------------------ Total yearly 1-19 20-500 501+ cost ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine Rescue Team Training \a\................... $24,905 $31,869 $708 $57,482 Mine Rescue Contests \b\........................ 6,466 8,486 159 15,111 --------------------------------------------------------------- Total....................................... 31,371 40,355 867 72,593 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 49.11.--Summary of New MINER Act Requirements for Underground Coal Mine Operators and Mine Rescue Teams ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Type of mine rescue team Requirement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mine-site Composite Contract State-sponsored * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Team members must participate at YES............... YES............... YES............... YES. least annually in two local mine rescue contests. Team members must participate in Annually.......... Semi-annually..... Quarterly at Large Annually. mine rescue training at each Mines; Semi- mine covered by the mine rescue annually at Small team. A portion of the training Mines. must be conducted underground. Team must be available at the YES............... YES............... YES............... YES. mine within 1 hour ground travel time from the mine rescue station. Team members must be YES............... YES............... YES............... YES. knowledgeable about the operations and ventilation of each covered mine. Team must include at least two .................. YES............... .................. .................. active employees from each covered large mine and at least one active employee from each covered small mine. Team must be comprised of .................. .................. YES............... .................. persons with a minimum of 3 years underground coal mine experience that shall have occurred within the 10-year period preceding their employment on the contract mine rescue team. All mine operators must provide for two certified mine rescue teams. Large mine operators shall provide one team that is either an individual mine-site mine rescue team or a composite team. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 49.50-A.--Initial Criteria To Certify the Qualifications of Mine Rescue Teams ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Qualification Criteria (30 CFR) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Team is available at all times when 49.12(a); 49.12(g) miners are underground. (2) Except where alternative compliance is 49.12(b) permitted, team has five members and one alternate. (3) Members have experience working in an 49.12(c) underground coal mine. (4) Team is available within 1-hour ground 49.12(f) travel time from the mine rescue station to the mine. (5) Appropriate mine rescue equipment is 49.16 provided, inspected, tested, and maintained. (6) Members are physically fit............. 49.17 (7) Members have completed initial training 49.18(a) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Table 49.50-B.--Annual Criteria To Maintain Mine Rescue Team Certification ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Qualification Criteria (30 CFR) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (1) Members are properly trained annually.. 49.18(b) (2) Members are familiar with the 49.20(a)(1) operations of each covered mine. (3) Members participate in at least two 49.20(a)(2) local mine rescue contests annually. Judges certify results. (4) Members participate in mine rescue 49.20(b)(1); training at each covered mine. 49.20(b)(2)(iii); 49.20(b)(3)(ii); 49.20(b)(4) (5) Members are knowledgeable about the 49.20(b)(2)(ii); operations and ventilation of each covered 49.20(b)(3)(i); 49.30 mine. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|