Homecrumb arrowDBE Programcrumb arrowOfficial Questions and Answers (FAQs) DBE Program Regulations (49 CFR 23)

Official Questions and Answers (FAQs) DBE Program Regulations (49 CFR 23)
Print this page

Q.  Section 23.3
In the ACDBE program, what financial obligations may be counted toward the personal net worth exclusions for assets supporting business financing?

A. 

* The definition of personal net worth (PNW) in the ACDBE regulation is the following:

Personal net worth means the net value of the assets of an individual remaining after total liabilities are deducted. An individual's personal net worth does not include the following: The individual's ownership interest in an ACDBE firm or a firm that is applying for ACDBE certification; the individual's equity in his or her primary place of residence; and other assets that the individual can document are necessary to obtain financing or a franchise agreement for the initiation or expansion of his or her ACDBE firm (or have in fact been encumbered to support existing financing for the individual's ACDBE business), to a maximum of $3 million [emphasis added]. An individual's personal net worth includes only his or her own share of assets held jointly or as community property with the individual's spouse.

* Only assets supporting obligations for which the individual is currently liable, which are properly documented, and for which his or her personal assets are encumbered, should be counted toward this exclusion.

EXAMPLE 1:  Smith has $3 million line of credit from a bank to initiate an airport concession project for Firm X.  His personal assets are pledged as security for the entire $3 million line of credit.  At the time the Firm X applies for certification as an ACDBE,

Smith has drawn $600,000 from the line of credit.  Because his only obligation at the time of application is to repay the $600,000 draw from the line of credit, the proper amount to be excluded from the PMW calculation for Smith is $600,000.

EXAMPLE 2: Two years ago, Jones got a $2 million loan to expand his airport concession business. His personal assets were pledged as security for the loan.  Firm Y applied for ACDBE certification at the same time as Jones received his loan, and the $2 million was properly excluded from his PNW certification.  By today, however, Jones has paid off $1.2 million of the loan.  Only $800,000 is now properly excluded from today’s PNW calculation, if proper documentation is provided.  (Annual affidavits should reflect the current balance remaining to be paid on the loan, not the original amount of the loan.)

EXAMPLE 3:  Brown received a loan from a bank for $1.5 million in connection with starting a concession.  At the time her firm applies for certification, however, the assets securing the loan appear to be those of a concession corporation, as distinct from her own personal assets.  The $1.5 million is not properly excluded from Brown’s PNW calculation.            

* The initiation or expansion of a concession concerning which an owner seeks this exclusion should be real and present rather than a possibility that is speculative or well into the future.   For example, assets supporting a loan or line of credit obtained today for a projected expansion of a concession three years from now would not be a reasonable basis for excluding the assets from today’s PNW calculation. 

            *  Assets eligible for this exclusion from the PNW calculation are properly excluded from an owner’s PNW calculation regardless of the location of concession for which the financing in question was arranged. 

EXAMPLE 1:  Williams got a loan of $1 million from Bank X to start a concession business at Airport 1.  Her personal assets were pledged as security for the loan.  Airport 1 properly excluded $1 million when it calculated Williams’ PNW.  Now Williams is starting Firm B at Airport 2.  When Firm B applies to Airport 2 for ACDBE certification, $500,000 remains to be paid off on the loan to Bank X.  Airport 2 should exclude $500,000 in calculating Williams’ PNW, assuming proper documentation is provided. 

EXAMPLE 2:  Williams also got a $1.3 million loan from Bank Y to help finance the concession at Airport 2.  Her personal assets, above and beyond those pledged as security for the $1 million loan from Bank X, are pledged as security for the loan from Bank Y.  Airport 2 would properly exclude $1.3 million in calculating Williams’ PNW, in addition to the $500,000 excluded in Example 1, for a total of $1.8 million.   The total assets excluded under this provision of the rule could never exceed $3 million. 

*  Since an ACDBE applicant bears the burden of demonstrating its eligibility, it is reasonable for recipients to request all supporting documentation for each financial obligation claimed by the applicant, including loan agreements, supporting lien and/or letter of credit documents, and specification of the assets used to secure a loan or line of credit.  Recipients should pay particular attention to the terms of a financial obligation, determine the extent to which the individual owner, as distinct from a corporation or other party, is obligated to repay, or is repaying, the obligation.  The recipient should make appropriate inquiries into whether there are any additional borrowers or other factors that may affect the size or duration of the individual owner’s debt. 

* The guidance in this Q &A applies only to 49 CFR Part 23.  It does not apply to 49 CFR Part 26.

 

Q.  Section 23.31; 27.67(b)(2)
If the owner of a DBE or ACDBE certified firm or applicant firm has a personal net worth of less than $750,000, does that necessarily mean that the recipient must regard the owner as being economically disadvantaged?

A. 

No.  A person cannot be regarded as economically disadvantaged if he or she exceeds the $750,000 personal net worth (PNW) cap.  However, there may be some cases in which an individual whose PNW is less than $750,000 may properly be regarded as not being economically disadvantaged.

* The legal and policy rationale behind the PNW provision of the rule is that a program designed to assist socially and economically disadvantaged individuals should not include people who can reasonably be regarded as having accumulated wealth too substantial to need the program’s assistance.

*  Consequently, in determining whether an individual is economically disadvantaged, a recipient is entitled to look not only at the individual’s PNW but also at his or her overall economic situation to make a reasonable determination of whether the individual is fairly regarded as being economically disadvantaged.

* Consistent with Small Business Administration practice in the 8(a) program, it is appropriate for recipients to review the total fair market value of the individual’s assets and determine if that level appears to be substantial and indicates an ability to accumulate substantial wealth. 

*  For example, an individual with very high assets and significant liabilities may, in accounting terms, have a PNW of less than $750,000.

However, the person’s assets (e.g., a very expensive house, a yacht, extensive real or personal property holdings) may lead to a conclusion that he or she is not economically disadvantaged.  The recipient can rebut the individual’s presumption of economic disadvantage under these circumstances, as provided in  sec. 26.67(b)(2).

* This guidance applies to determinations of economic disadvantage under both 49 CFR Part 23 and 49 CFR Part 26.