Internet: www.bls.gov/ro5/ FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
GENERAL INFORMATION: (312) 353-1880 Tuesday, May 20, 2008
MEDIA CONTACT: Paul LaPorte 
(312) 353-1138  

 County Employment and Wages in Wisconsin, Third Quarter 2007

The average weekly wage in Outagamie County increased 4.9 percent from the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007, the largest advance among Wisconsin’s seven counties with employment of 75,000 or more as measured by 2006 annual average employment. Winnebago County had the second-highest wage growth at 3.9 percent, followed by Racine County at 3.2 percent. Waukesha County had the highest average weekly wage level in the State at $814, followed by the counties of Milwaukee ($802) and Dane ($783). (See table 1.) Regional Commissioner Jay A. Mousa noted that among Wisconsin’s seven largest counties, only Outagamie reported wage growth above the national rate of 4.3 percent and none had average weekly wages above the national average of $818.

Among the seven largest counties in Wisconsin, employment was highest in Milwaukee County (497,800) and lowest in Racine County (76,400) in September 2007. Only one of the State’s large counties—Outagamie—recorded an employment gain greater than the national average of 0.9 percent.

Employment and wage levels (but not over-the-year changes) are also available for the 65 counties in Wisconsin with employment below 75,000. All of the State’s smaller counties had average weekly wages below the national level. (See table 2.)

Wage Levels in Large Counties

The average weekly wage levels in the counties of Waukesha, Milwaukee, Dane, and Winnebago placed in the top half of the national ranking among the 328 largest counties in the United States. Waukesha County’s average weekly wage ranked 114th; Milwaukee’s, 127th; Dane’s, 138th; and Winnebago’s, 161st. While none of these counties had average weekly wages above that for the nation, Waukesha, Milwaukee, and Dane Counties were within 5 percent of the U.S. average.

The average weekly wages in Wisconsin’s three other large counties placed in the bottom half of the national rankings: Outagamie ($712/229th), Brown ($719/216th), and Racine ($738/193rd).

Across the country, average weekly wages were higher than the national average in 112 of the largest 328 U.S. counties. Santa Clara, Calif., held the top position among the highest-paid large counties with an average weekly wage of $1,585. New York County, N.Y., was second with an average weekly wage of $1,544, followed by Washington, D.C. ($1,376), Arlington, Va. ($1,364), and San Mateo, Calif. ($1,322).

Nationwide, there were 215 counties with an average weekly wage below the national average in the third quarter of 2007. The lowest average weekly wage was reported in Cameron County, Texas ($518), followed by the counties of Hidalgo, Texas ($529), Horry, S.C. ($536), Webb, Texas ($548), and Yakima, Wash. ($568).

Wage Changes in Large Counties

Only one of Wisconsin’s seven large counties recorded wage growth above the national increase of 4.3 percent from the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007. (See table 1.) As mentioned, Outagamie County’s 4.9-percent wage gain was the largest increase in the State and ranked 71st in the nation. Winnebago, at 3.9 percent, placed 134th. Brown County had the State’s smallest wage increase, 1.8 percent and ranked 272nd among the nation’s largest counties.

Among the largest counties in the nation, Clayton County, Ga., led the nation in growth in average weekly wages, with an increase of 23.9 percent from the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007. Muscogee, Ga., was second with growth of 12.1 percent, followed by the counties of Santa Clara, Calif. (11.8 percent), Rock Island, Ill. (11.5 percent), and Davidson, Tenn. (9.1 percent).

Over the year, 10 large counties experienced declines in average weekly wages. Among the five largest decreases in wages, Trumbull, Ohio, had the greatest decline (-10.6 percent), followed by the counties of Vanderburgh, Ind. (-6.1 percent), Genesee, Mich. (-4.0 percent), Saginaw, Mich. (-3.1 percent), and Montgomery, Ohio (-3.0 percent).

Wage Levels in Wisconsin’s Smaller Counties

All of the 65 counties in Wisconsin with employment below 75,000 had average weekly wages below the national level. Florence County reported the lowest wage at $389 in the third quarter of 2007. The highest wage among Wisconsin’s small counties was $767 in Wood, followed by $722 in Ozaukee. (See table 2.)

When all 72 counties in Wisconsin were considered, 12 counties in the State reported average weekly wages ranging from $400 to $499 and 50, or nearly three-quarters, reported average weekly wages in the $500 to $699 range. Among the higher-paid counties, Waukesha and Milwaukee were the only counties with average weekly wages above $800. These better-paid counties were located in the Milwaukee-Racine metropolitan area.

State Average Weekly Wages

At the state level, the average weekly wage in Wisconsin was $705, $113 below the nationwide figure, ranking 33rd among the 50 states and the District of Columbia. (See table 3.) The five highest wage levels in the nation were in the District of Columbia ($1,376), Connecticut ($1,021), New York ($1,009), Massachusetts ($1,002) and New Jersey ($965). All had wages at least 18 percent higher than the national average. Three states had average earnings of less than 75 percent of the national average: South Dakota ($598), Mississippi ($607), and Montana ($608).

Wisconsin experienced wage growth of 2.6 percent from the third quarter of 2006 to the third quarter of 2007, ranking 47th among the 50 states and District of Columbia. Wage gains in the neighboring states of Minnesota (4.6 percent), Iowa (4.2 percent), and Illinois (4.0 percent) were all considerably larger, while Michigan (2.4 percent) experienced similar wage growth. (See table 3.) Nationwide, the highest over-the-year wage gains in the third quarter of 2007 were recorded by Washington (6.7 percent), Connecticut (6.6 percent), and New York (6.1 percent). The only state to report a decline in average weekly wages was Rhode Island, where wages edged down 0.1 percent.

Average weekly wage data by county are compiled under the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW) program, also known as the ES-202 program. The data are derived from reports submitted by employers subject to state and federal unemployment insurance (UI) laws. The 9.0 million employer reports cover 136.2 million full- and part-time workers. The average weekly wage values are calculated by dividing quarterly total wages by the average of the three monthly employment levels of those covered by UI programs. The result is then divided by 13, the number of weeks in a quarter. It is to be noted, therefore, that over-the-year wage changes for geographic areas may reflect shifts in the composition of employment by industry, occupation, and such other factors as hours of work. Thus, wages may vary among counties, metropolitan areas, or states for reasons other than changes in the average wage level. Data for all states, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs), counties, and the nation are available on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/; however, data in QCEW press releases have been revised (see Technical Note below) and may not match the data contained on the Bureau’s Web site.

Additional statistics and other information

An annual bulletin, Employment and Wages, features comprehensive information by detailed industry on establishments, employment, and wages for the nation and all states. The 2006 edition of this bulletin contains selected data produced by Business Employment Dynamics (BED) on job gains and losses, as well as selected data from the first quarter 2007 version of this news release. This edition includes the data on a CD for enhanced access and usability. As a result of this change, the printed booklet contains only selected graphic representation of QCEW data; the data tables themselves are published exclusively in electronic formats as PDF and fixed-width text files. Employment and Wages Annual Averages, 2006 is now available for sale from the United States Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents. On-line ordering information is available at http://bookstore.gpo.gov/. The 2006 bulletin is available in a portable document format (PDF) on the BLS Web site at www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn06.htm.

Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: 202-691-5200; TDD message referral phone number: 1-800-877-8339.

For personal assistance or further information on the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages Program, as well as other Bureau programs, contact the Midwest Information Office in Chicago at (312) 353-1880 from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. CT.

TECHNICAL NOTE

QCEW data are the sums of individual establishment records reflecting the number of establishments that exist in a county or industry at a point in time. For this reason, county and industry data are not designed to be used as a time series.

The preliminary QCEW data presented in this release may differ from data released by the individual states as well as from the data presented on the BLS Web site. The potential differences result from several causes. Differences between BLS and state published data may be due to the continuing receipt, review and editing of UI data over time. On the other hand, differences between data in this release and the data found on the BLS Web site are the result of adjustments made to improve over-the-year comparisons. Specifically, these adjustments account for administrative (noneconomic) changes such as a correction to a previously reported location or industry classification. Adjusting for these administrative changes allows users to more accurately assess changes of an economic nature (such as a firm moving from one county to another or changing its primary economic activity) over a 12-month period. Currently, adjusted data are available only from BLS press releases.

 

Table 1. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and the 7 largest counties in Wisconsin, third quarter 2007 (2)
Area Employment Average Weekly Wage (3)
September 2007 (thousands) Percent change, third quarter 2006-07 (5) Average weekly wage National ranking by level (4) Percent change, third quarter 2006-07 (5) National ranking by percent change (4)

United States (6)

136,246.9 0.9 $818 4.3

   Wisconsin

2,802.3 -0.1 705 33 2.6 47

       Brown, Wis.

150.4 0.0 719 216 1.8 272

       Dane, Wis.

306.2 (7) 783 138 (7) -

       Milwaukee, Wis.

497.8 0.0 802 127 2.8 223

       Outagamie, Wis.

104.8 1.7 712 229 4.9 71

       Racine, Wis.

76.4 -1.1 738 193 3.2 199

       Waukesha, Wis.

236.4 -0.6 814 114 3.0 211

       Winnebago, Wis.

90.4 0.4 765 161 3.9 134
  1. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
  2. Data are preliminary.
  3. Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
  4. Ranking does not include the county of San Juan, Puerto Rico.
  5. Percent changes were computed from quarterly employment and pay data adjusted for noneconomic county reclassifications.
  6. Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands. 
  7. Data do not meet BLS or State agency disclosure standards.
 
Table 2. Covered (1) employment and wages in the United States and all of the counties in Wisconsin, third quarter 2007 (2)
Area Employment September 2007  Average weekly wage (3)

United States (4)

136,246,900 $818

  Wisconsin

2,802,342 705

    Adams

5,003 496

    Ashland

8,921 594

    Barron

21,380 534

    Bayfield

4,238 442

    Brown

150,398 719

    Buffalo

5,355 692

    Burnett

4,818 489

    Calumet

13,136 538

    Chippewa

21,966 604

    Clark

10,432 558

    Columbia

21,441 595

    Crawford

8,747 480

    Dane

306,182 783

    Dodge

35,162 668

    Door

14,811 493

    Douglas

15,691 581

    Dunn

16,377 595

    Eau Claire

56,474 643

    Florence

1,101 389

    Fond Du Lac

46,837 661

    Forest

3,466 490

    Grant

16,956 526

    Green

15,230 540

    Green Lake

7,387 574

    Iowa

10,574 562

    Iron

1,987 469

    Jackson

8,630 626

    Jefferson

34,809 596

    Juneau

9,379 579

    Kenosha

55,301 662

    Kewaunee

7,445 681

    La Crosse

66,062 627

    Lafayette

3,767 484

    Langlade

8,047 508

    Lincoln

11,474 608

    Manitowoc

35,356 637

    Marathon

71,312 682

    Marinette

19,888 584

    Marquette

4,208 482

    Menominee

2,128 504

    Milwaukee

497,849 802

    Monroe

20,241 584

    Oconto

9,526 502

    Oneida

17,905 542

    Outagamie

104,819 712

    Ozaukee

39,408 722

    Pepin

2,256 518

    Pierce

9,213 553

    Polk

15,448 553

    Portage

33,687 605

    Price

6,373 558

    Racine

76,366 738

    Richland

6,079 543

    Rock

68,084 692

    Rusk

5,402 483

    Sauk

38,047 556

    Sawyer

7,986 599

    Shawano

13,047 517

    Sheboygan

62,977 684

    St. Croix

29,295 610

    Taylor

8,408 570

    Trempealeau

13,265 561

    Vernon

8,079 505

    Vilas

8,963 450

    Walworth

40,729 586

    Washburn

5,864 507

    Washington

53,103 653

    Waukesha

236,367 814

    Waupaca

20,939 572

    Waushara

6,913 499

    Winnebago

90,413 765

    Wood

44,712 767
  1. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
  2. Data are preliminary.
  3. Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
  4. Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
 
Table 3. Covered (1) employment and wages by state, third quarter 2007 (2)
State Employment Average weekly wage (3)
September 2007 (thousands) Percent change, third quarter 2006-07  Average weekly wage National ranking by level  Percent change, third quarter 2006-07  National ranking by percent change 

United States (4)

136,246.9 0.9 $818 - 4.3 -

Alabama

1,959.0 1.1 707 32 3.7 37

Alaska

327.3 0.7 840 13 5.4 9

Arizona

2,644.9 0.5 783 20 4.1 25

Arkansas

1,184.5 0.3 629 46 4.1 25

California

15,755.0 0.7 932 6 4.5 18

Colorado

2,314.3 2.4 844 12 3.2 42

Connecticut

1,696.9 1.0 1,021 2 6.6 2

Delaware

425.2 0.1 860 10 1.2 50

District of Columbia

679.0 0.6 1,376 1 5.3 12

Florida

7,879.9 -0.9 741 26 4.1 25

Georgia

4,089.4 1.2 782 21 4.1 25

Hawaii

624.4 0.3 760 22 5.4 9

Idaho

675.5 2.2 634 45 3.4 41

Illinois

5,917.6 0.6 866 9 4.0 32

Indiana

2,937.4 0.5 702 34 2.2 49

Iowa

1,494.5 0.9 668 40 4.2 22

Kansas

1,368.7 1.7 680 38 2.7 46

Kentucky

1,814.3 1.0 676 39 3.0 44

Louisiana

1,880.8 2.7 716 31 4.5 18

Maine

615.3 0.7 660 44 3.9 35

Maryland

2,563.7 0.7 892 7 4.1 25

Massachusetts

3,261.0 1.0 1,002 4 5.5 5

Michigan

4,218.2 -1.4 808 16 2.4 48

Minnesota

2,713.3 0.9 822 15 4.6 16

Mississippi

1,142.2 0.6 607 50 3.8 36

Missouri

2,746.7 0.8 719 29 4.2 22

Montana

446.1 2.7 608 49 4.6 16

Nebraska

922.7 1.7 666 41 5.4 9

Nevada

1,286.4 -0.1 792 19 5.5 5

New Hampshire

637.2 0.3 799 18 3.2 42

New Jersey

3,985.2 0.1 965 5 3.7 37

New Mexico

830.4 0.8 682 37 4.1 25

New York

8,585.3 1.3 1,009 3 6.1 3

North Carolina

4,104.1 2.4 719 29 3.5 40

North Dakota

347.4 1.5 621 48 5.8 4

Ohio

5,331.9 -0.2 745 25 2.8 45

Oklahoma

1,548.2 1.8 666 41 5.5 5

Oregon

1,751.7 1.2 750 24 4.2 22

Pennsylvania

5,673.4 0.5 802 17 4.4 20

Rhode Island

486.1 -1.0 759 23 -0.1 51

South Carolina

1,904.7 1.7 664 43 3.6 39

South Dakota

397.5 2.0 598 51 4.7 15

Tennessee

2,774.4 0.5 728 28 4.3 21

Texas

10,304.9 2.9 825 14 5.0 13

Utah

1,231.6 3.6 696 36 5.5 5

Vermont

305.2 -0.2 699 35 4.0 32

Virginia

3,686.6 1.0 857 11 5.0 13

Washington

2,976.5 2.1 878 8 6.7 1

West Virginia

713.8 0.3 623 47 4.0 32

Wisconsin

2,802.3 -0.1 705 33 2.6 47

Wyoming

284.3 3.6 734 27 4.1 25

Puerto Rico

1,008.0 -1.1 453 (5) 2.5 (5)

Virgin Islands

45.0 0.7 682 (5) -0.3 (5)
  1. Includes workers covered by Unemployment Insurance (UI) and Unemployment Compensation for Federal Employees (UCFE) programs.
  2. Data are preliminary.
  3. Average weekly wages were calculated using unrounded data.
  4. Totals for the United States do not include data for Puerto Rico or the Virgin Islands.
  5. Data not included in the national ranking.

 

Last Modified Date: May 20, 2008