|
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081109154734im_/http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081109154734im_/http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
Updated 8:00 AM EST, April 15, 2008
Demand Responsive Vehicles where Automated Dispatching or Control Software is Available
2004 National Summary
Number of Metropolitan Areas Surveyed / Returned Survey | Number of Metropolitan Areas Reporting Demand Responsive Vehicles where Automated Dispatching or Control Software is Available | Number of Demand Responsive Vehicles |
---|
Where Automated Dispatching or Control Software is Available | Total | Percent |
---|
81 / 80 | 48 | 4534 | 10501 | 43% |
2004 Metropolitan Summary
Metropolitan Area | State | Number of Agencies Surveyed / Returned Survey | Number of Agencies Reporting Demand Responsive Vehicles where Automated Dispatching or Control Software is Available | Number of Demand Responsive Vehicles |
---|
Where Automated Dispatching or Control Software is Available | Total | Percent |
---|
Albany, Schenectady, Troy | NY | 1 / 1 | 1 | 33 | 33 | 100% | Albuquerque | NM | 1 / 1 | 1 | 55 | 55 | 100% | Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton | PA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 125 | 125 | 100% | Atlanta | GA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0% | Austin | TX | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 105 | 0% | Bakersfield | CA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 14 | 14 | 100% | Baltimore | MD | 3 / 3 | 2 | 42 | 52 | 81% | Baton Rouge | LA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0% | Bellingham | WA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 38 | 38 | 100% | Birmingham | AL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0% | Boston, Lawrence, Salem | MA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 430 | 0% | Buffalo, Niagara Falls | NY | 2 / 2 | 1 | 26 | 26 | 100% | Charleston | SC | 1 / 1 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 100% | Charlotte, Gastonia, Rock Hill | NC | 2 / 2 | 1 | 83 | 85 | 98% | Chicago, Gary, Lake County | IL | 11 / 11 | 2 | 189 | 601 | 31% | Cincinnati, Hamilton | OH | 1 / 1 | 1 | 51 | 51 | 100% | Cleveland, Akron, Lorain | OH | 4 / 4 | 2 | 159 | 307 | 52% | Columbus | OH | 1 / 1 | 1 | 40 | 40 | 100% | Dallas, Fort Worth | TX | 6 / 6 | 1 | 182 | 259 | 70% | Dayton, Springfield | OH | 2 / 2 | 1 | 60 | 74 | 81% | Denver, Boulder | CO | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 228 | 0% | Detroit, Ann Arbor | MI | 2 / 2 | 2 | 105 | 105 | 100% | El Paso | TX | 1 / 1 | 1 | 45 | 45 | 100% | Fresno | CA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 22 | 22 | 100% | Grand Rapids | MI | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 0% | Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point | NC | 3 / 3 | 2 | 53 | 59 | 90% | Greenville, Spartanburg | SC | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0% | Hampton Roads | VA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Harrisburg, Lebanon, Carlisle | PA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 0% | Hartford, New Britain, Middletown | CT | 3 / 3 | 1 | 100 | 225 | 44% | Honolulu | HI | 1 / 1 | 1 | 114 | 114 | 100% | Houston, Galveston, Brazoria | TX | 1 / 1 | 1 | 118 | 118 | 100% | Indianapolis | IN | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 0% | Jacksonville | FL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0% | Kansas City | MO | 0 / 0 | 0 | N/R* | N/R* | N/R* | Knoxville | TN | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0% | Las Vegas | NV | 1 / 1 | 1 | 168 | 168 | 100% | Little Rock, North Little Rock | AR | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0% | Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside | CA | 22 / 22 | 5 | 559 | 989 | 57% | Louisville | KY | 1 / 1 | 1 | 78 | 78 | 100% | McAllen | TX | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0% | Memphis | TN | 1 / 1 | 1 | 68 | 68 | 100% | Miami, Fort Lauderdale | FL | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 605 | 0% | Milwaukee, Racine | WI | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0% | Minneapolis, St. Paul | MN | 1 / 1 | 0 | N/R* | N/R* | N/R* | Nashville | TN | 1 / 1 | 1 | 45 | 45 | 100% | New Haven, Meriden | CT | 2 / 2 | 1 | 42 | 48 | 88% | New Orleans | LA | 5 / 5 | 1 | 40 | 92 | 43% | New York, Northern New Jersey, Southwestern Connecticut | NY | 21 / 21 | 3 | 297 | 865 | 34% | Oklahoma City | OK | 1 / 1 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 100% | Omaha | NE | 1 / 1 | 1 | 16 | 16 | 100% | Orlando | FL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 131 | 0% | Philadelphia, Wilmington, Trenton | PA | 2 / 2 | 1 | 500 | 500 | 100% | Phoenix | AZ | 6 / 6 | 2 | 238 | 264 | 90% | Pittsburgh, Beaver Valley | PA | 5 / 5 | 1 | 4 | 472 | 1% | Portland, Vancouver | OR | 2 / 2 | 1 | 186 | 236 | 79% | Providence, Pawtucket, Fall River | RI | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 0% | Raleigh-Durham | NC | 4 / 4 | 1 | 5 | 72 | 7% | Richmond, Petersburg | VA | 2 / 2 | 0 | N/R* | 67 | N/R* | Rochester | NY | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 0% | Sacramento | CA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Salinas | CA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 11 | 34 | 32% | Salt Lake City, Ogden | UT | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 94 | 0% | San Antonio | TX | 1 / 1 | 1 | 210 | 210 | 100% | San Diego | CA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose | CA | 17 / 17 | 3 | 54 | 223 | 24% | San Juan | PR | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Sarasota-Bradenton | FL | 2 / 2 | 1 | 17 | 53 | 32% | Scranton, Wilkes-Barre | PA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Seattle, Tacoma | WA | 10 / 10 | 2 | 75 | 286 | 26% | Springfield | MA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 125 | 0% | St. Louis | MO | 1 / 1 | 0 | N/R* | 100 | N/R* | Syracuse | NY | 1 / 1 | 1 | 22 | 22 | 100% | Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater | FL | 3 / 3 | 2 | 47 | 247 | 19% | Toledo | OH | 1 / 1 | 1 | 44 | 44 | 100% | Tucson | AZ | 2 / 2 | 1 | 99 | 99 | 100% | Tulsa | OK | 1 / 1 | 0 | N/R* | 35 | N/R* | Washington | DC | 5 / 5 | 1 | 16 | 341 | 5% | West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Delray | FL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | Wichita | KS | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0% | Youngstown, Warren | OH | 1 / 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 71% | 81 Metropolitan Areas * N/R = No response |
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081109154734im_/http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
| ![](images/spacer.gif) |