|
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081109060650im_/http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
![spacer](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081109060650im_/http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
Updated 8:00 AM EST, April 15, 2008
Fixed Route Buses Equipped with Smart Card Readers
2005 National Summary
Metropolitan Areas Surveyed / Returned Survey | Metropolitan Areas Reporting Fixed Route Buses Equipped with Smart Card Readers | Number of Fixed Route Buses |
---|
With Smart Card Readers | Total | Percent |
---|
78 / 76 | 18 | 11349 | 49612 | 23% |
2005 Metropolitan Summary
Metropolitan Area | State | Agencies Surveyed / Returned Survey | Agencies Reporting Fixed Route Buses Equipped with Smart Card Readers | Number of Fixed Route Buses |
---|
With Smart Card Readers | Total | Percent |
---|
Albany, Schenectady, Troy | NY | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 0% | Albuquerque | NM | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 152 | 0% | Allentown, Bethlehem, Easton | PA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 82 | 0% | Atlanta | GA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 665 | 0% | Austin | TX | 1 / 1 | 1 | 403 | 403 | 100% | Bakersfield | CA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 78 | 0% | Baltimore | MD | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 824 | 0% | Baton Rouge | LA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 68 | 77 | 88% | Birmingham | AL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 74 | 0% | Boston, Lawrence, Salem | MA | 1 / 1 | 1 | 17 | 1000 | 2% | Buffalo, Niagara Falls | NY | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 340 | 0% | Charleston | SC | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 66 | 0% | Charlotte, Gastonia, Rock Hill | NC | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 334 | 0% | Chicago, Gary, Lake County | IL | 11 / 11 | 2 | 2690 | 2726 | 99% | Cincinnati, Hamilton | OH | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 390 | 0% | Cleveland, Akron, Lorain | OH | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 852 | 0% | Columbus | OH | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 270 | 0% | Dallas, Fort Worth | TX | 6 / 6 | 0 | 0 | 162 | 0% | Dayton, Springfield | OH | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 253 | 0% | Denver, Boulder | CO | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 1086 | 0% | Detroit, Ann Arbor | MI | 3 / 2 | 1 | 300 | 381 | 79% | El Paso | TX | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 159 | 0% | Fresno | CA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 106 | 0% | Grand Rapids | MI | 1 / 1 | 1 | 93 | 93 | 100% | Greensboro, Winston-Salem, High Point | NC | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0% | Greenville, Spartanburg | SC | 3 / 3 | 1 | 17 | 30 | 57% | Hampton Roads | VA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 339 | 0% | Harrisburg, Lebanon, Carlisle | PA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 0% | Hartford, New Britain, Middletown | CT | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 241 | 0% | Honolulu | HI | 1 / 1 | 1 | 525 | 525 | 100% | Houston, Galveston, Brazoria | TX | 1 / 1 | 1 | 1239 | 1239 | 100% | Indianapolis | IN | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 146 | 0% | Jacksonville | FL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 174 | 0% | Kansas City | MO | 1 / 0 | 0 | N/R* | N/R* | N/R* | Knoxville | TN | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 0% | Las Vegas | NV | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 315 | 0% | Little Rock, North Little Rock | AR | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 0% | Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside | CA | 22 / 22 | 4 | 2790 | 4542 | 61% | Louisville | KY | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 252 | 0% | Memphis | TN | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 147 | 0% | Miami, Fort Lauderdale | FL | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 1253 | 0% | Milwaukee, Racine | WI | 3 / 3 | 0 | 0 | 112 | 0% | Minneapolis, St. Paul | MN | 1 / 1 | 1 | 849 | 849 | 100% | Nashville | TN | 1 / 1 | 1 | 136 | 136 | 100% | New Haven, Meriden | CT | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 112 | 0% | New Orleans | LA | 5 / 5 | 1 | 33 | 439 | 8% | New York, Northern New Jersey, Southwestern Connecticut | NY | 21 / 19 | 0 | 0 | 10438 | 0% | Oklahoma City | OK | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 0% | Omaha | NE | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 0% | Orlando | FL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 237 | 0% | Philadelphia, Wilmington, Trenton | PA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 1349 | 0% | Phoenix | AZ | 6 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 708 | 0% | Pittsburgh, Beaver Valley | PA | 5 / 5 | 0 | 0 | 1069 | 0% | Portland, Vancouver | OR | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 724 | 0% | Providence, Pawtucket, Fall River | RI | 2 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 235 | 0% | Raleigh-Durham | NC | 4 / 4 | 0 | 0 | 249 | 0% | Richmond, Petersburg | VA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 198 | 0% | Rochester | NY | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 252 | 0% | Sacramento | CA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0% | Salt Lake City, Ogden | UT | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 483 | 0% | San Antonio | TX | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 450 | 0% | San Diego | CA | 3 / 3 | 2 | 327 | 677 | 48% | San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose | CA | 17 / 15 | 2 | 174 | 2048 | 8% | San Juan | PR | 1 / 0 | 0 | N/R* | N/R* | N/R* | Sarasota-Bradenton | FL | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 61 | 0% | Scranton, Wilkes-Barre | PA | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 68 | 0% | Seattle, Tacoma | WA | 10 / 10 | 0 | 0 | 2246 | 0% | Springfield | MA | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 195 | 0% | St. Louis | MO | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 425 | 0% | Syracuse | NY | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 211 | 0% | Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater | FL | 3 / 3 | 1 | 180 | 383 | 47% | Toledo | OH | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 185 | 0% | Tucson | AZ | 2 / 2 | 0 | 0 | 185 | 0% | Tulsa | OK | 1 / 1 | 0 | N/R* | 57 | N/R* | Washington | DC | 5 / 5 | 1 | 1457 | 2083 | 70% | West Palm Beach, Boca Raton, Delray | FL | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 0% | Wichita | KS | 1 / 1 | 1 | 51 | 51 | 100% | Youngstown, Warren | OH | 1 / 1 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 0% | 78 Metropolitan Areas * N/R = No response |
|
![](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20081109060650im_/http://www.itsdeployment.its.dot.gov/images/spacer.gif) |
| ![](images/spacer.gif) |